OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

WA state used the same Suspicious Sequoia software for ballot scanners, that was purchased in 2005 by Smartmatic, a front co for Hugo Chavez

Posted on | November 27, 2010 | 3 Comments

 

Search results for:

  • Equipment Used For: All Equipment
  • In Selected State: Washington
  • Type of Voting Equipment: Optical Scan – All
  • Equipment Vendor: Sequoia Voting Systems/Dominion
  • Model: All Models
  • Paper Type: All Equipment
Jurisdictions: 0 | Total registered voters in search results: Not yet available | Verifier Home
State Jurisdiction Used for Type of equipment Vendor Model Paper type # of registered voters
Category: Uncategorized

Comments

3 Responses to “WA state used the same Suspicious Sequoia software for ballot scanners, that was purchased in 2005 by Smartmatic, a front co for Hugo Chavez”

  1. Phil
    November 28th, 2010 @ 2:41 am

    Wow! Orly, how is it that Washington State could have the Sequoia Software, Voting Machines? I checked and they have a (R) S.O.S.!

    I even wrote that Gentleman, Mr. Reed, along with all of the others (in the mainland-48) about how the (2) voting machines: Sequoia and Diebold have a “bad” reputation and couldn’t be trusted! So I’m kind of wondering why they used them? But…maybe it was not feasible for them to change machines, as it could’ve been too close to the election, to switch?

    But this means that the person (the scientist candidate-?) had problems receiving the proper amount of votes-(?), since this is the same type of problem that Angle experienced with Reid (Nv), with the “slot-machine” type of voting machine!

    Maybe we should get a list of the areas where these (2) machines are being used to count votes? Although, some may not want to admit that they are using them?

    And considering that “none” of the nationwide S.O.S.’s vetted Obama in 2008, all states (S.O.S.’s) need to start checking out (“all”) voting machines, nationwide, including Alaska & Hawaii.

    And everyone reading this, please start making contact with: governors, attorney generals, your state legislatures, and the “newly” elected (S.O.S.’s) to see to it that it would be very “judicious” to “abandon” these voting machines, completely, and go back to just using “paper ballots,” without the machines! Then, there would be no more question as to “who” won any particular race! But, of course, any opposition to this would come from some “treasonous types” who want to continue with “business as usual”!

    Let’s see if we can get that accomplished ASAP, in Jan. onward, before the next election, with giving enough time for the legislatures to correct this?

    So let’s hope that the scientist will push for a re-count, to count the paper ballots “by hand”! And the same for the govnorership in Minnesota, Nevada, etc.!

    Davey Crockett…

  2. Phil
    November 28th, 2010 @ 2:46 am

    Wow! Orly, how is it that Washington State could have the Sequoia Software, Voting Machines? I checked and they have a (R) S.O.S.!

    I even wrote that Gentleman, Mr. Reed, along with all of the others (in the mainland-48) about how the (2) voting machines: Sequoia and Diebold have a “bad” reputation and couldn’t be trusted! So I’m kind of wondering why they used them? But…maybe it was not feasible for them to change machines, as it could’ve been too close to the election, to switch?

    But this means that the person (the scientist candidate-?) had problems receiving the proper amount of votes-(?), since this is the same type of problem that Angle experienced with Reid (Nv), with the “slot-machine” type of voting machine!

    Maybe we should get a list of the areas where these (2) machines are being used to count votes? Although, some may not want to admit that they are using them?

    And considering that “none” of the nationwide S.O.S.’s vetted Obama in 2008, all states (S.O.S.’s) need to start checking out (“all”) voting machines, nationwide, including Alaska & Hawaii.

    And everyone reading this, please start making contact with: governors, attorney generals, your state legislatures, and the “newly” elected (S.O.S.’s) to see to it that it would be very “judicious” to “abandon” these voting machines, completely, and go back to just using “paper ballots,” without the machines! Then, there would be no more question as to “who” won any particular race! But, of course, any opposition to this would come from some “treasonous types” who want to continue with “business as usual”!

    Let’s see if we can get that accomplished ASAP, in Jan. onward, before the next election, with giving enough time for the legislatures to correct this?

    So let’s hope that the scientist will push for a re-count, to count the paper ballots “by hand”! And the same for the govnorership in Minnesota, and with Angle in Nevada, etc.!

    Davey Crockett…

  3. Phil
    November 28th, 2010 @ 2:51 am

    Wow! Orly, how is it that Washington State could have the Sequoia Software, Voting Machines? I checked and they have a (R) S.O.S.! And here’s his email:…
    !

    I even wrote that Gentleman, Mr. Reed, along with all of the others (in the mainland-48) about how the (2) voting machines: Sequoia and Diebold have a “bad” reputation and couldn’t be trusted! So I’m kind of wondering why they used them? But…maybe it was not feasible for them to change machines, as it could’ve been too close to the election, to switch?

    But this means that the person (the scientist candidate-?) had problems receiving the proper amount of votes-(?), since this is the same type of problem that Angle experienced with Reid (Nv), with the “slot-machine” type of voting machine!

    Maybe we should get a list of the areas where these (2) machines are being used to count votes? Although, some may not want to admit that they are using them?

    And considering that “none” of the nationwide S.O.S.’s vetted Obama in 2008, all states (S.O.S.’s) need to start checking out (“all”) voting machines, nationwide, including Alaska & Hawaii.

    And everyone reading this, please start making contact with: governors, attorney generals, your state legislatures, and the “newly” elected (S.O.S.’s) to see to it that it would be very “judicious” to “abandon” these voting machines, completely, and go back to just using “paper ballots,” without the machines! Then, there would be no more question as to “who” won any particular race! But, of course, any opposition to this would come from some “treasonous types” who want to continue with “business as usual”!

    Let’s see if we can get that accomplished ASAP, in Jan. onward, before the next election, with giving enough time for the legislatures to correct this?

    So let’s hope that the scientist will push for a re-count, to count the paper ballots “by hand”! And the same for the govnorership in Minnesota, and with Angle in Nevada, etc.!

    Davey Crockett…

Leave a Reply