OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi


More clarification on Obama’s use of a stolen Social Security number from CT. He used it as recently as this year to file his 2009 tax returns. When we’ll have one judge with a drop of shame and integrity and honesty to care about the fact, that we have a president, committing social security fraud and identity theft? One judge? Anywhere?

Posted on | November 16, 2010 | 18 Comments

Jim

1. There is not an identity of the person the number was issued to ( that was the reason for the attempt to get the SS5 form issued to that number ), just that it was issued to someone born in 1890.

2. It is the number he used ( and is still using ). If you go on the Selective Service Verificaton database, you will see the record. ( you can see it here : https://www.obfelony.webs.com )
Also, if you download a copy of his 2009 tax return, you can see he is still using that number. If you look at Form 709, they did an electronic “white out ” of the number. Anyone with a PDF editor can open up that form and remove the “white out” When you do, you will see the number.

The number was issued out of Conn in Feb of 1977. In order to get a number issued out of Conn, you had to have applied there and have a mailing address there. Seeing as he was attending school in Hawaii in Feb 1977 andhas no record of ever living in Conn., it raises questions as to the legitimacy of the number. Now, this does not mean that HE obtained the number illegally- just that he is using an illegal number. His mother may have given the number to him and told him that was his number. He is just using it no knowing that it was obtained illegally. But that raises the question ; “Why would his mother obtain an illegal number when it very easy to obtain a legal one ? ”

comment from Orly:

Obama might not have known about the SS fraud, when he was a kid, but he is my age now, he is a grown man, he is an attorney, who calls himself a Constitutional scholar. The whole World is laughing at us. We allowed a complete fraud in the White House, and we allowed him to destroy our economy and freedoms. even Saturday Night Live is mnaking jokes about it.

Jimmy Kimmel was joking: “What is the difference between Barack Obama and his dog BO” the answer he gave: “Bo, the dog, has papers”.

Lefty reporter Jake Taper from the left to Lenin ABC de facto told David Axelrod, that he and his boss are stinking liars, when Axelrod told Taper, that Obama showed his BC and Taper said: no, not the long one.

What will it take for us to find one honest judge anywhere? How many judges need to be removed from the bench and replaced until we will find one, who will be true to his oath of office to defend the Constitution?

Why Royce Lamberth, chief judge of the District of Columbia, and others are ignoring the evidence of Social Security fraud committed by Obama?
1 #

Comments

18 Responses to “More clarification on Obama’s use of a stolen Social Security number from CT. He used it as recently as this year to file his 2009 tax returns. When we’ll have one judge with a drop of shame and integrity and honesty to care about the fact, that we have a president, committing social security fraud and identity theft? One judge? Anywhere?”

  1. Kathy M
    November 17th, 2010 @ 4:17 am

    Since Obama used that stolen social security number to file tax returns in 2009, there is a high probably that he also used that same ss number for the past several years on tax returns. Question: did the Obamas’ file a joint tax return? If they did, Mrs. Obama can also be indicated under ss fraud. It might be easier to get her to talk.

    Since when does anybody think its “OK” to go to “Grandma” for a social security number?
    Unbelievable!! This is simply the “sins of the Fathers”, it is a total lifestyle!

    When you file tax returns using a stolen ss number, couldn’t that also be listed as “racketeering” in addition to many other charges. There is another reason to use a stolen ss number. That reason would be to hide money at banks (they require ss numbers for accounts) that would be untraceable. He probably has at least over a dozen of different stolen social security numbers used at various banks around the world for money laundering purposes. Since he is trying to destroy our dollar he would have moved MONEY into a “safer” form for his purposes out of the country. Like a safe deposit box in Switzerland filled with gold, all under another fake ss number. Remember, he likes spending OTHER PEOPLES MONEY in addition to using other peoples personal IDs. Zero integrity.

    The judges refusing to defend the Constitution will go down in history as sellouts to a Traitor. That will be their legacy for their children & grandchildren.

    God Bless & Keep Fighting

  2. hippybiker
    November 17th, 2010 @ 6:02 am

    My experiences with the legal system in this country lead me to the conclusion, that the term “Honest Judge” is an Oxymoron.

  3. Chum Lee
    November 17th, 2010 @ 7:45 am

    You believe there is something sinister. I do not.

    I concede that a public database provides the following:

    Name – OBAMA, BARACK HUSSEIN
    Gender – Male
    Street Address – 365 BROADWAY APT B1
    City, State, Zip – SOMERVILLE MA 02145-2440
    Probable Current Address – No
    Telephone –
    Telephone Accountholder –
    Social Security – 042-68-xxxx
    Age – 119
    Date of Birth – 1890
    Deceased – No
    Date Record Verified –

    Name – OBAMA, BARACK H
    Gender – Male
    Street Address – 365 BROADWAY APT B1
    City, State, Zip – SOMERVILLE MA 02145-2440
    Probable Current Address – No
    Telephone –
    Telephone Accountholder –
    Social Security – 042-68-xxxx
    Age – 47
    Date of Birth – Aug 04, 1961
    Deceased – No
    Date Record Verified –

    This is a given. It does not tell us if the address even existed in 1890, if the person is really 119 years old, etc. It is very common to find goof ups, transpositions, and what not in these public databases.

    The only way to convince me that Obama is using multiple SSNs or the SSN of some dead guy is if you can show some documents that Obama signed with various SSNs. I am not saying Obama is not using multiple SSNs, but it is the burden of the accuser to show a little more than public database entries that can be subject to all sorts of errors.

    Without proof that he used multiple numbers on official documents – I will say no dice and put in the same category of questions like: “prove that you have not beaten up disabled people for fun.”

  4. Paul Jackson
    November 17th, 2010 @ 8:16 am

    Thanks for answering my questions.

    I had no doubt it was the number he was using, and it appears from the answers there’s no evidence, in fact you admit the possibility Obama did not himself obtain the number by fraud or illegal means, if I’m understanding you correctly, so it must have been his mother doing so.

    Orly, I hope you are feeling better today.

  5. Nathan
    November 17th, 2010 @ 8:43 am

    The whole World is laughing at YOU. Not US.

    The whole world knows the truth: that CT and Hawaii have zip codes that are just one digit off and a simple typo or mis-reading caused President Obama to be issued a SSN for CT.

    Golly gee, he used it to file his taxes!

  6. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    November 17th, 2010 @ 11:55 am

    yes, thank you. I am back at work. Bills have to be paid

  7. queenofshina
    November 17th, 2010 @ 12:05 pm

    Gee, Nathan! That’s really funny and excusable, isn’t it? How about a simple typo on my IRS form so I’m not me but someone else? Do ya’ think I can get by with it?? Do ya’think the IRS is going to overlook it? Get real!!!

  8. chum lee
    November 17th, 2010 @ 3:00 pm

    It has yet to be established that the number belongs top someone born in 1890. Show me a little more than some public database. Show me that it was used by the 119 year old. I will assume nothing sinister until I see more than guessing and actual proof it belonged to someone other than Obama. Some public database is not gonna cut it with me.

  9. Yephora
    November 17th, 2010 @ 3:42 pm

    Chum: How can Orly or anyone else show some documents with different SS#’s when 0bama has sealed all his documents, hiding them from scrutiny.

    Doesn’t it make sense now why 0bama wants all the records from his past hidden?

  10. Starla
    November 17th, 2010 @ 3:51 pm

    Dr. Orly,

    I read this comment here at: https://drkatesview.wordpress.com/2010/11/16/obamas-choice/#comments

    and I wanted to pass it on to ALL Americans far and wide!

    “Paula
    Tuesday, November 16, 2010, at 9:26 pm
    OT, but very important…

    “NaturalNews) Senate Bill 510, the Food Safety Modernization Act, has been called “the most dangerous bill in the history of the United States of America.” It would grant the U.S. government new authority over the public’s right to grow, trade and transport any foods. This would give Big brother the power to regulate the tomato plants in your backyard. It would grant them the power to arrest and imprison people selling cucumbers at farmer’s markets. It would criminalize the transporting of organic produce if you don’t comply with the authoritarian rules of the federal government.

    “It will become the most offensive authority against the cultivation, trade and consumption of food and agricultural products of one’s choice. It will be unconstitutional and contrary to natural law or, if you like, the will of God.” – Dr. Shiv Chopra, Canada Health whistleblower

    This tyrannical law puts all food production (yes, even food produced in your own garden) under the authority of the Department of Homeland Security. Yep — the very same people running the TSA and its naked body scanner / passenger groping programs.

    This law would also give the U.S. government the power to arrest any backyard food producer as a felon (a “smuggler”) for merely growing lettuce and selling it at a local farmer’s market.

    It also sells out U.S. sovereignty over our own food supply by ceding to the authority of both the World Trade Organization (WTO) and Codex Alimentarius.

    It would criminalize seed saving, turning backyard gardeners who save heirloom seeds into common criminals. This is obviously designed to give corporations like Monsanto a monopoly over seeds.

    It would create an unreasonable paperwork burden that would put small food producers out of business, resulting in more power over the food supply shifting to large multinational corporations.

    I encourage you to read more about this dangerous bill at the Food Freedom blog on WordPress and watch this excellent video on NaturalNews.TV which explains S.510 in more detail.

    Take action now or lose your right to grow your own food!!

    Sign this petition at Citizens for Health:
    http://www.citizens.org/?page_id=2312

    Do it today! This is really important. This site may be overloaded with people going to it to protest. Try again later if this is the case.

    In addition, the Cornucopia Institute recently sent out an urgent call-to-action email containing the following information:

    How to protest Senate Bill 510:

    1) Go to Congress.org and type in your zip code in the box in the upper right hand corner.

    2) Click on your Senator’s name, and then on the contact tab for their phone number. You can also call the Capitol Switchboard and ask to be directly connected to your Senator’s office: 202-224-3121 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 202-224-3121 end_of_the_skype_highlighting.

    3) Once connected ask to speak to the legislative staff person responsible for agriculture. If they are unavailable leave a voice mail message. Be sure to include your name and phone number.

    Give them this message in support of the “Tester Amendment” which would exempt small farms from S.510:

    “I am a constituent of Senator___________. I ask that he/she support the Tester Amendment to the food safety bill. The Tester Amendment will exempt the safest, small, owner-operator farms and food facilities and farmers who direct market their products to consumers, stores or restaurants. Food safety legislation should not create inappropriate and costly regulatory barriers to family farms and the growing healthy food movement in the drive to crack down on corporate bad actors. Please support the Tester Amendment and market opportunities for small and mid-sized family farms, and small food processing facilities.”

    You may also wish to explain that you oppose the Food Safety Modernization Act in its entirety, and it is a destructive, freedom-crushing law that will destroy the future of food in America.

    Remember, America has already lost control over its money supply to the Federal Reserve (nearly a hundred years ago). America has lost its health due to the medical industry and its profit-from-sickness agenda. Now we may lose our right to grow our own food and save our own seeds if Senate Bill 510 passes.

    This is a dangerous, tyrannical law that would thrust the American people into an age of darkness and malnutrition. It would criminalize many of the very people growing our food and turn food production into yet another corporate monopoly.

    Please take the time right now to contact your U.S. Senator and voice your strong opposition to this bill.”

  11. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    November 17th, 2010 @ 7:00 pm

    that is exactly, why those …. judges should have allowed discovery, yet they continue adding and abetting this massive fraud and treason against 309 million American Citizens . What will it take?

  12. Chum Lee
    November 17th, 2010 @ 7:52 pm

    Yephora, when did he seal his records? I recall an executive order that governed all presidential records, which put in place the more open records order that Bush closed up.

    That being said, if you allege or accuse, it is your responsibility to back it up – not the alleged perp’s. For example, if I go to the police station and accuse my neighbor of doing all kinds of evil, they still won’t have probable cause without some pretty good evidence of wrong doing. Showing some public database will not even get you probable cause.

    Look if the 119 year old guy has records, go and find them. Find his old rental agreements, death records, birth records, familial records, social security records, medical records, dental records. He had to have neighbors, see if any are alive. Look at the title to his home, see if he had children and/or a wife.

    That is the stuff I would put into an investigation, not merely hope that you get discovery. I tell you that I would never take a case forward if all my hopes are pinned on discovery.

    Find one official document where the 119-year old used the SSN that is assigned to Obama. A single document! You do not need anything from Obama.

  13. Yephora
    November 18th, 2010 @ 7:15 am

    From https://www.birtherreport.com

    “The Obama records which have not been released include; Passport records, Obama kindergarten records, Punahou School records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, University of Chicago scholarly articles, Illinois State Bar Association records, Illinois State Senate records/schedules(said to be lost), Medical records, Obama/Dunham marriage license, Obama/Dunham divorce documents, Soetoro/Dunham marriage license, Adoption records and of course the long-form Certificate of Live Birth.”

    Chum, his SS# would appear on most if not all of the above documents. Good luck finding any of them.

  14. Chum Lee
    November 18th, 2010 @ 1:27 pm

    Yephora-

    Show me where Obama had them sealed. I doubt you can get my records either, but that does not equate to them being sealed.

  15. Clyde
    November 18th, 2010 @ 9:18 pm

    Chum Lee, go read executive order #13489, it was filed on 1-21-09, it is an executive order that Obama used to seal all of his records.

  16. Chum Lee
    November 19th, 2010 @ 4:47 pm

    Clyde,

    AGain, that EO only covers PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS. You need to actually read it. It is not retroactive, and actually broadens what is available.

  17. Clyde
    November 20th, 2010 @ 1:14 am

    Chum, I have read it and it seals all of his records buddy. Why do you think it was issued the next day after he took office?

  18. Chum Lee
    November 20th, 2010 @ 7:26 am

    You have not read it. You could not have read it, and read the Presidential Records Act which defines “presidential records” and honestly believe that Obama’s records prior to becoming president are covered.

    First, it defines Presidential Records and refers you to the Presidential Records Act.
    If you did that you would learn that those records are defined in 44 USC Chapter 22 section 2201:

    “(2) The term “Presidential records” means documentary materials, or any reasonably segregable portion thereof, created or received by the President, his immediate staff, or a unit or individual of the Executive Office of the President whose function is to advise and assist the President, in the course of conducting activities which relate to or have an effect upon the carrying out of the constitutional, statutory, or other official or ceremonial duties of the President.”

    If you read the Order and the PRA which the Order refers to, you will see that it covers documents used by/created by the President with further limitations. How are or were Obama’s school records “created or received by the President . . . in the course of conducting activities which relate to or have an effect upon the carrying out of the constitutional, statutory, or other official or ceremonial duties of the President.”

    In other words, the documents/records MUST CONCERN the conducting of the duties of the President.

    Also, Obama’s Order made records easier to obtain, particularly for former-Presidents. It reverted back to the Order issued by Reagan, which Bush II took away. SO my question is: what do you have against Reagan’s Order?

Leave a Reply