from Full Disclosure Network (Edited)
Posted on | September 21, 2010 | No Comments
September 20, 2010
Video Here
10 minutes
Los Angeles, CA — On Friday, September 17, 2020 Richard I Fine was released from his solitary “coercive confinement” cell in L A County Mens Central jail where he spent the last 18 months. He was unexpectedly released by Order of California Superior Court Judge David P. Yaffe who had just posted a Minute Order on September 16, 2010, one day before, where he restated that Fine should continue incarceration, setting a hearing date for six months in the future. Although Richard Fine was never charged with a crime or convicted he was incarcerated after attempting to disqualify Judge Yaffe from sitting on his civil contempt of court case due to a conflict of interest.
Yom Kippur Turn-Around?:
Why would Judge Yaffe reverse himself the very next day on September 17th on Kol Nidre, the first day of Yom Kippur, the Day of Atonement in the Jewish religion. Judge Yaffe apparently had a change of heart, issuing an Order that Sheriff Baca release Richard Fine from jail. It should be noted that the U.S. Supreme Court precedent in the 1974 case of L.A. Times reporter William T. Farr (In Re Farr) held that a person should not be held for more five days in "Coercive Confinement" for civil contempt of court. Was this the reason Judge Yaffe had a change of heart?
Yaffe Explains His Confusion:
Judge Yaffe took pains to explain his frustration in his September 17, 2010 Minute Order releasing Dr. Fine from jail……..
Real News…
Real Issues… Real People……
CA Superior Court Judge David P. Yaffe
RELATED LINKS:
Yaffe’s Departing 8-23-10 Minute Order
Yaffe’s Admission: Court Transcript
Yaffe’s Admission: False Evidence
Fine’s Petition For En Banc Re-hearing”
Page 1 reference to “Yaffe’s Admissions
of fraud upon the court and obstruction Justice” 9th Circuit Court of Appeals
Case No. 09-56073
Following his resignation announcement Judge Yaffe posted this 8-23-10 Minute Order declaring his intention to hold Richard I. Fine indefinitely in solitary “coercive confinement” without charge or conviction. He refused Fines request for a FARR hearing previously and in this Order cited no legal authorities or reference to the U S Supreme Court Precedent in the case of William T. Farr where Justice William O Douglas held a five day limit for incarcerating individuals for civil contempt where the person is fighting on “moral” grounds.
Comments
Leave a Reply












29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 
