OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi


Supreme court clerks are at it again and are not docketing my resubmission to justice Alito

Posted on | July 27, 2010 | 26 Comments

you can reach the Supreme Court at 202-479-3000

202-479-3472 and demand an answer, why didn’t they docket resubmission brief, which was confirmed as received by the clerk’s office.

In my resubmission to Alito, just like in the original to Thomas (whose signature is missing on the order to deny) I am asking to stay the sanctions and to grant  me limited discovery to prove, that my legal action was not frivolous. I will be seeking Obama’s vital records in such discovery.

Comments

26 Responses to “Supreme court clerks are at it again and are not docketing my resubmission to justice Alito”

  1. Elizabeth
    July 27th, 2010 @ 8:19 am

    It would seem that the Supreme
    Court clerks need to be personally
    confronted by you, Dr. Orly.

    I don’t know if one needs to make
    an appointment or what to get into
    that building.. (never been there
    to see the lay of the land)

    but, it is time to physically
    approach the monster head-on.

    Just my crusader side coming out.

  2. Richard Bauer
    July 27th, 2010 @ 8:34 am

    Repeat of my earlier post to you:

    Dr. Taitz,

    I just hung up from a call I made to the Supreme Court, 07-27-2010, @ 11:58 a.m, and spoke briefly with Mr. Eric Fossum at 202-479-3000.

    I asked him if he could help me in the status of the case “Rhodes v. MacDonald”, number 10A56. Initially, he said he wasn’t the clerk handling the case…. I then asked him if he couls just tell me if the case was on the docket. He asked the name on the case and I told him Rhodes v. MacDonald” . . . he then told me that wasn’t the name on the case 10 A 56 and the name was Taitz. He then told me in no uncertain terms “He spoke with Taitz yesterday and wasn’t going to go down that road again” . He also told me the case was “denied”. I then asked him “who signed the order”? He said “it was signed by the clerk of the court” My next obvious question to him was, “is that the same as a real judge signing it?” He once again told me he wasn’t going to go down that road any more. I ended my call with the words “ I just want to see the Constitution upheld but your reticence in talking with me any further was disappointing”, or words to that effect, and the call was completed.

    I’m so sorry you have to endure events such as these on a daily, ongoing basis. You have my total admiration in your stamina and hope, in the future I can be of some help.
    Thanks for your service!

    Dick Bauer

  3. Kathy M
    July 27th, 2010 @ 9:27 am

    Have you considered contacting the FBI about this issue? I would like to think that it would fall under their watch if these documents are being intercepted away from the Justices. (Or has Obama’s people taken over the gates of the Supreme Court?)

    I will also call these clerks later today.

    God Bless

  4. Alexander Gofen
    July 27th, 2010 @ 10:09 am

    Recalling the long history of all those in/out of the docket and of the computer machinations in the Supreme Court of the Land with all the submissions of Dr. Taitz, I cannot believe for a second, that it happens without the full knowledge and approval of all the so called Justices themselves.

    Or, other way around, if Justices of the Supreme Court of the Land are not aware of machinations of their own clerks, it is not a Supreme Court of a civilized nation…

    Either way, putting it straight: America does not have a Supreme Court any more. It became clear since January 2009, when the Chief Justice Roberts with straight face administered the presidential oath to an obvious fraud.

    Such a “supreme court” must be dismissed…

    The US “congress” which does not know the civics and had approved the presidency of a fraud must be dismissed.

    Both parties – de facto one party – with the media/government complex must be dismissed.

    Then what does remain of the country (if anything)?

    American patriots! We are in a deadly peril. Rise up!

  5. P. Barnett
    July 27th, 2010 @ 10:16 am

    Orly,
    you need to give Judicial notice of Apuzzo’s defeat of sanctions in appeals court (Kerchner v. Obama).. this should make your’s go away..

  6. Edward Paard
    July 27th, 2010 @ 10:17 am

    I am of the thinking that Elizabeth is having the right idea on this.

    Dear lady, you are needing to go directly to the Supreme Court and be confronting them directly. This is very important and you are being in your rights to demand not only that the justices attend to this matter at once, but that the clerks and other staff members being arrested for obstuction of justice.

    You are brave enough to confront the beasts where it lives. Now it is of the time to go there in person and demand that they hear your claims. The clerks are being corrupt in this, that we know. You need to go directly and in person to the courts and justices and bypass the clerks treason.

  7. Kathy M
    July 27th, 2010 @ 11:39 am

    I just tried calling (twice) to Chief Clerk William Sutter. A woman asked me what it was in regards to and I stated “Official Business”. They refused to put me through to Mr. Sutter and tried to get to to speak with some other clerk instead. I was polite and professional but said “No thank you”.

    My recommendation would be to personally take the papers into the supreme court building with at least two other people, hopefully like some interested representative. What happens next would be taped onto the security cameras for future review.

    The “gatekeepers” of the supreme court are assuming the role of judge and jury themselves. If this avenue of justice has already been taken from us, what next??

  8. Jacob
    July 27th, 2010 @ 12:26 pm

    Please read this article, and you will get the picture. You are not the only one treated like this in the court system.

    https://69.84.25.250/blogger/post/Blagojevich-Trial-Corruption-Revealed.aspx

    Simply outrageous!!!

  9. ch
    July 27th, 2010 @ 12:51 pm

    https://www.gao.gov/

    I wonder if the General Accountability Office would be worth a phone call. If the Supreme Court is overrun with lawless clerks, they might be able to guide you to a channel to investigate and follow the paper/electronic trail. They might also be able to guide about social security fraud, and who investigates. There also might be a legal nonprofut watchdog group in DC who could facilitate interacting with the court and even walk across the street and find out what the clerks are up to.

  10. Alexander Gofen
    July 27th, 2010 @ 1:00 pm

    Recalling the long history of all those in/out of the docket machinations in the Supreme Court of the Land regarding all the submissions of Dr. Taitz, I cannot believe for a second, that it happens without the full knowledge and approval of all the Justices themselves.

    Or, other way around, if Justices of the Supreme Court of the Land are not aware of machinations of their own clerks, it is not a Supreme Court of a civilized nation…

    Either way: America does not have a Supreme Court any more. It became clear since January 2009, when the Chief Justice Roberts with straight face administered the presidential oath to an obvious fraud.

    All the three branches of the government have discredited themselves and are illegitimate.

    Both parties – de facto one party – with the media/government complex are guilty in overlooking and orchestrating this unprecedented crisis.

    Then what does remain of the country (if anything)?

    American patriots! We are in a deadly peril. Rise up!

  11. Flotsam
    July 27th, 2010 @ 2:22 pm

    I agree with Kathy M. This is OUTRAGEOUS and violation of Lady Liberty’s due process rights!

    We need to organize demonstration on steps of Supreme Court. And we need to send people for sit on until they grant Lady Liberty’s emergency motions.

    We need discovery. This is best way to get it to prove that $20,00 sanction from Judge Land was not justifiable.

    WHERE IS THE SIGNATURE? WHY IS THE DOCKET NOT CHANGED?

  12. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    July 27th, 2010 @ 2:24 pm

    those are irrelevant. They threatened sanctions against Hemenway and did not give them. My case is different, because I brought on behalf of the active officers, who were supposed to deploy. They brought on part of retired officers and they didn’t mention SS fraud. Mario Apuzzo and John Hemenway are very nice people, but they simply didn’t represent real threat, I did. That is the reason, why the court went harsher against me.

  13. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    July 27th, 2010 @ 2:25 pm

    FBI local agents told me that they are supposed to send everything to the headquarters in DC, but DC does nothing

  14. Elizabeth
    July 27th, 2010 @ 3:33 pm

    Kathy M and Edward Paard are in agreement
    that you need to face them head-on and
    demand your legal rights, not only as
    an attorney but as a citizen of America.

    This is crazy stuff and smells of sabotage
    from within.

    What right does a minion, (clerk) have to
    censor any legal paperwork submitted to
    a supreme court judge? This isn’t
    Nazi Germany .. whoever these people are,
    they are Obama supporters and have infiltrated
    to a position of control over who is
    able to submit papers and who is not,
    according to what the paperwork contains.

    That is downright scary, in itself.

    They need to be brought to task and
    relieved of their jobs, and soon.

    Yours may not be the only instance
    like this.

    And I agree, you need to have representatives
    with you; someone who can vouch for
    whatever action takes place.

    Imagine if they forcibly forbid you to
    go into the offices, to hand over the
    paperwork, to even speak to a judge
    in person. This would be best if filmed.

    There has to be a superior over these
    clerks. Every minion has a supervisor.
    Start at the top and work down.

    If I lived in that area, I would be
    willing and able to face these
    anarchists and join you for the
    confrontation.

  15. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    July 27th, 2010 @ 3:56 pm

    you can try calling them or writing to them

  16. Flotsam
    July 27th, 2010 @ 3:59 pm

    Yes, Lady Liberty, we will write and call. Can you tell us exactly how we should phrase what we say?

    God bless.

  17. D. Oltieri
    July 27th, 2010 @ 5:52 pm

    “I cannot believe for a second, that it happens without the full knowledge and approval of all the Justices themselves”

    No, Mr Gofen! That is NOT true. Whatever transpired, undoubtedly did so without the full knowledge of Roberts and Thomas.

    This may well be the work of lawless obot Clerks, working covertly. all the evidence Dr Orly has presented points that way.
    I for one have every faith that Dr Taitz will prevail.

    When the Chief Justice and Associates know what’s really been going on, Dr Orly will get her day in court!

  18. Jack Meoff
    July 27th, 2010 @ 6:58 pm

    Taitz is an ignorant bitch, and the rest of you motherfuckers are out of your minds for letting her lead you on this silly crusade.

  19. Politijabber
    July 27th, 2010 @ 7:22 pm

    This is outrageous! Orly, you need someone to march into that clerk’s office and demand that the papers be docketed immediately or the clerks will have hell to pay. I know just the person to do this for you — two, in fact. Walt and Darren. They’ll know exactly what to do.

  20. Ro
    July 28th, 2010 @ 5:00 am

    First was “journ O list” and now “clerk O list”.

    We need a group to go there and confront them.

  21. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    July 28th, 2010 @ 10:47 am

    that’s a very stupid joke

  22. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    July 28th, 2010 @ 10:49 am

    no, Roberts got all the papers on March 13, 2009, he promised a review, it is on youTube, but he did absolutely nothing

  23. D. Oltieri
    July 28th, 2010 @ 2:17 pm

    Dr Orly. I have changed my view about the Confederation of Dunces/Obot Clerks.

    It’s now clear that the clerks are not acting together, and I think you should refocus your efforts on presenting your please to each Associate Justice in turn, as is your perfect right.

  24. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    July 28th, 2010 @ 2:33 pm

    you don’t understand, all od the stay applications go through this one clerk Danny Bickel. He is the gate keeper for the usurper

  25. D. Oltieri
    July 28th, 2010 @ 3:18 pm

    Please forgive my ignorance on these matters, Dr Taitz.

    I read somewhere that Bickell is just the deputy in his section, so if you know who the boss of Bickell is, you could make your concerns known to him/her.

    I’m sorry I don’t know who that is, but what if it is him/her trying to thwart you at every turn, and Bickell is just ‘obeying orders’?

  26. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    July 28th, 2010 @ 6:29 pm

    his boss is chief clerk William Sutter

Leave a Reply