12 Responses to “A 70 year old former assistant US attorney is rotting in prison for a year and a half on a contempt of court charge. If we don’t end this Obama regime tyranny, it will end this society. Justice Kennedy refused the habeas corpus based on a short memo from Danny Bickell”

1. John Brown
   July 23rd, 2010 @ 5:56 am

   And this is what will happen to you if you refuse to pay sanctions imposed by the court.

   They’re coming, Dr. Orly. They’re coming for YOU!

2. Redd
   July 23rd, 2010 @ 6:27 am

   LA business Examiner..Joe Zernick article 7/1/10..
   Human Rights Alert (NGO) also forwarded its complaint against Mr Bickell to the Chairs of US Congress Judiciary Committees, and urged them to initiate review of unvalidated and insecure case management systems of the US courts, which permitted conduct as documented in the complaint. The complaint was also copied to the United Nations, as part of the 2010 – first ever – review by the United Nations of Human Rights in the United States. Human Rights Alert’s April 2010 report to the United Nations alleged that unvalidated and false case management systems at the US courts were employed for large-scale deprivation of rights. [2] In paper filed by Dr Zernik for review by international computer science conference, large-scale fraud was alleged in PACER and CM/ECF – the public access and case management systems of the US courts. [3] The international computing community was urged to assume a leading role in protection of rights in the digital era.

3. Redd
   July 23rd, 2010 @ 11:04 am

   … 30 miles from where Obama was born…
   https://www.plan-uk.org/involved/schools/obamaelection/

4. Politijabber
   July 23rd, 2010 @ 11:17 am

   Sorry, Orly, I don’t get it. Richard Fine was in contempt of court for refusing to respond to a notice of Debtor’s Examination. As an attorney, he of all people should know better. When one deliberately disobeys a court order, such as an Order to Show Cause, he/she risks imprisonment. So what is your point? That you condone his flagrant disobedience of the court?

5. Politijabber
   July 23rd, 2010 @ 11:26 am

   Moreover, as the Court’s order noted, Fine holds the keys his jail cell — he has been free to submit to a Debtor Examination at any time, and he will be released. The law is very clear on contempt. So long as he continues his contumacious conduct, he will remain in jail. It is his choice. I don’t understand why you want to make a crusade out this — defending a disbarred lawyer who is thumbing his nose at the court, and the mish mash of stuff you post on this website does nothing to illuminate for us why you are defending this man.

6. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
   July 23rd, 2010 @ 11:34 am

   the whole case looks like corruption. Legislature and Governator changed the law retroactively in the middle of the night and ordered Fine to pay attorneys fees of the other party. When he refused, they put him in prison for a year, total abuse of power by Jaffe. Thank god he is leaving the bench. Look, I can understand supplemental payments, I wouldn’t beat the drum of war over a new law, but to order an attorney who won the case according to the 3 judge panel of the court of Appeals to pay the fees of the other side, when they retroactively changed the law, and to throw him in prison for a year and a half when he refused, that where I really draw the line, this is too much.
   You are an attorney. What if that is done to you? I am sure you are one of Obama’s supporters, maybe you are Scott Tepper going under a new name, not by “sternguard” anymore. Be carefull, getting a job as an alligator feeder. After you throw everyone else to alligators, you will be the last one to be eaten by them 🙂

7. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
   July 23rd, 2010 @ 11:38 am

   I just posted my answer.
   The word mish mash doesn’t sound like Tepper, maybe his partner

8. Politijabber
   July 23rd, 2010 @ 2:43 pm

   The law changed? Ridiculous. The law of contempt has been the same for hundreds of years. Read the Court’s order that you linked to — I mean, really READ it. It sets out the facts. The plaintiffs obtained a judgment against Fine, a disbarred attorney who continued to practice law. He took those people for a ride, Orly. He did not advise them that he was not authorized to practice. Then, when they sought to enforce their judgment, Fine refused to submit to the Debtor Examination. The court ordered him to appear. He refused. The court held him in contempt. All of this took place several years, long before that law was amended. Long before the judge retired. Long before Arnold appointed a new judge.

   You don’t get it, do you? Richard Fine is not the victim of corruption. He is the victim of his own misjudgment. Your defense of him, simply because you think the California courts have given you a raw deal, is itself indefensible. READ THE ORDER, Orly. Take the time to understand what really happened.

   And no, I’m not “Tepper’s” (whoever he is) partner. Look at my IP. Orly, there are 100,000 attorneys in the United States. More than just this “Tepper” guy understand law and know what we’re talking about.

9. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
   July 23rd, 2010 @ 3:56 pm

   Fine represented condominium owners in Santa Monica, who were opposed to the Marina Shores development. This is your typical “Pelican brief.” He stated, that the case had to be heard by an out of county judge, since county was the party and LA county judges got nearly 50,000 supplemental salary from the county. When he started this case, he was not disbarred. Why was he targeted? Follow the money trail. This development in Santa Monica was supposed to give millions of dollars in profit. You know and I know, why he was targeted.
   No, I was not born yesterday and would not go against all the judges of LA county, even I would not do it. I was not born yesterday and I understand the need to develop the city, I get it. I understand that people need to make a living. With all that said and done, this case should have been settled. If there ever was a case that should have been settled, this would be it.
   Fine had a distinquished career. He was a highly respected assistant US attorney and antitrust lawyer. He didn’t cheat, he didn’t steal from his clients, he wasn’t incompetent. You tell me, why did they disbar him? The only reason they took his license, was because he was in the way and ruffled some feathers. They changed the law retroactively, allowing judges to get supplemental payments from the county, even though the county was a party to the litigation in front of them. Clear conflict of interest. He challenged it and the establishment machine went after him and disbarred him.
   This matter needs to be settled. This is a blemish for the US judiciary. This standoff does not benefit anyone. What David Jaffe did, was too much. I am sure, like every Ashkenazi family he lost relatives in the Holocaust, and using such Gestapo tecnique is despicable. He should have realized, how delicate the situation was and should have worked very hard to settle. Sorry, but sometimes men show their machism in the wrong situations. Maybe there should have been a woman, settling this matter. What is the alternative? They will do Jim MacDugal to him? Too late even for that, the case is well known around the world. Maybe I should be the one to work out a settlement?

10. Politijabber
    July 24th, 2010 @ 3:48 pm

    Fine was disbarred for filing a stream of disqualification motions and other papers containing what the State Bar Court found to be false and frivolous charges regarding members of the state bench. The hearing judge said Fine “engaged in what amounts to an almost never-ending attack on anyone (including attorneys and judicial officers) who disagreed with him or otherwise got in his way.”

    Sound familiar?

11. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    July 24th, 2010 @ 4:07 pm

    Judges of Los Angeles county were getting $59,000 additional payments from the county. As a consequence, for years no attorney could win a case against the county in front of those judges. Tell me, how is it not a conflict of interest? Cases involving LA county should have been heard in other counties due to the fact that the judges of LA county got supplemental payments fronm the county on top of what was paid by the state. You find this argument to be frivolous? You believe that this is a reason to disbar him? and if so, how can you call yourself an officer of the court? how can you call yourself a decent human being for that matter?
    I’ve seen and I am sure you have seen attorneys steeling from their clients, attorneys committing crimes and nothing was done by the bar, or just a warning or a slap on the wrist.

12. Jetsam
    July 24th, 2010 @ 8:31 pm

    And we should trust your judgment — why?

Leave a Reply