Posted on | June 22, 2012 | 6 Comments
This is extremely important. I am now getting from people copies of the challenges they filed with their Secretaries of State and I am just about getting a heart attack, and I am ready to smack all of those morons from Article 2 super pack gang. Why so? Because those challenges are empty. There is nothing there aside from a quote of Minor v Happersett , and that is what Helen Tansey, Dean Haskins and the rest of this Article 2 superpack was telling people to do. I do not know whether these Article 2 superpack people are just dumb or they were brought to emasculate the effort, to reduce it to just a theoretical discussion, which is the easiest to beat, but they played Obama’s hand. Obama wants people to dwell in theoretical discussions and not go into the areas of crimes, which are black and white. When you get to crimes, Obama loses and loses big. Not only these crimes remove Obama from the White House, they move him straight into the Big House.
Here is an explanation. 2 citizen parent requirement is your weakest argument. It is a theoretical argument. There is no specific law, stating what is the meaning of natural born. There is no clear precedent. Minor v Happersett is a case, which dealt with voting rights, where the court simply mentioned that Virginia Minor was born in the country, her parents are citizens, she is a native, there are questions and doubts about other groups of people, whether they are citizens or not, but there is no doubt about her. I bring forward this case, but the Secretary of State is not required to be a legal scholar. She has a way out. Obama’s attorneys will brin Von Kim ark case and will argue that there is no specific law saying that it is not enough for one parent to be a US citizen. On the other hand the Sec of State has no right to be complicit in elections fraud, she has no right to put on the ballot a candidate, who is committing elections fraud. Your strongest argument is:
1. Obama is using a name that is not legally his. In his mother’s passport he is listed as Soebarkah. In his school records from Indonesia he is listed as Soetoro. This is fraud, identity fraud.
2. Obama published his tax returns. When they were opened in Adobe Illustrator, his full unredacted Social Security was clearly visible. He is using 042-68-4425. When E-verify and SSNVS were done, those showed that there is no match, this Connecticut Social was never assigned to Barack Obama. The man is a criminal, committing Social Security fraud, he is using a Social security number from a state, where he never resided, which was never assigned to him. He belongs in prison. Period, end of discussion.
3. His Selective Service certificate is a forgery. All of the other certificates from 1980 show a valid postage stamp with 4 digit year. Obama has a forged stamp with a 2 digit year. Forgery, fraud, he belongs in prison. (I wonder, how big was the incentive for Alvin Onaka to pull this)
4. His birh certificate was shown by multiple experts to be a computer generated forgery. Alvin T. Onaka and Obama both belong in prison for uttering forged documents.
If Secretary of State and elections commission allow this criminal on the ballot, they are criminally complicit in elections fraud, forgery and treason.
When you are bringing a ballot challenge and miss all of these important arguments, which are the meat and potatoes of your case, and you only mention article 2 superpack argument that 2 parents have to be US citizens, you rob yourselves of the strongest argument.
I mentioned Minor v Happersett in my pleadings. As a matter of fact I was the first attorney, who brought forward writings by Emer DeVatel, those were included in my Application for Stay on behalf of Gail Lightfoot that I filed with the Supreme Court of the United States four years ago, in 2008. While I did not abandon it, it is only a part of my case.
So, what do you need to do now?
Luckily, we get to bite a second bite of the apple, as we bring forward challenges to usurper Obama, criminal with forged IDs sitting in the White House, who is seeking to be a candidate in the general election.
I need you to get off the couch and start moving.
We need challenges in every state in the nation.
What I need you to do, is write to your Secretary of State and your Attorney General. Write that you demand immediate investigation of elections fraud and write that all the evidence of fraud anf forgery is in the attached letter from CA attorney Oly Taitz. Send this letter to me. Please, notarize your signature and provide me with the info of what state you reside in, name and address for your Sec of State and your AG. I will attach a letter with all the affidavits, video of the trial in Ga and Arpaio’s press conference and will submit it.
Also, I have to pay for my paralegal to put together all the papers, all the packages, I have to pay for the DVDs, for printing, for certified mail, so donations are desperately needed.
If we want to bring a strong case of racketeering, of top officials being criminally complicit in elections fraud, forgery and treason, we need to send all the evidence to them. We have to warn them, otherwise they will state that they had no knowledge of any crimes.
Keep in mind, we have power here. RICO allows ordinary citizens to bring causes of actions involving criminal charges and felonies. This is the beauty of RICO. We can make it, we have to make it. We cannot allow continuous usurpation of the US Presidency. This is a coup d’etat, this is a destruction of the country. We have to act.
PS I just got a copy of the order, showing that unfortunately Van Irion’s case for Liberty legal foundation and John Dummitt, filed in TN was dismissed. I am sorry about that, but we have to keep going.