Posted on | June 25, 2010 | 1 Comment
| Redd |
Submitted on 2010/06/25 at 12:10pm
If it is a “conflict of interest” for a judge to rule on the oil spill because he supposedly owns stock in the deep horizon [not true], then why isn’t it a conflict when a judge hires a “clerk” from a law firm representing the usurper, immediately before the hearing/ruling???? Judge Carter court. It was a conflict in Sarah Palin ethics case, once it was found out that the “investigator” worked for the usurpers law firm. |
Now I have 489,158 votes 0 # |
Comments
One Response to “”
Leave a Reply












29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

June 25th, 2010 @ 6:03 pm
Here is John Charlton comment…
October 17, 2009 by John Charlton
UNIMAGINABLE, UNBELIEVABLE, OUTRAGEOUS MOVE
by John Charlton
(Oct. 17, 2009) — In a stunning blow to the impartiality of the American Judicial system, Federal Judge David O. Carter, who is hearing the case Barnett vs. Obama, in the Central District, Southern Division Court at Santa Ana, California, has just hired a lawyer who works for a law firm where Robert F. Bauer, one of Obama’s top lawyers is a partner. And that, just days before the Oct. 5, 2009 hearing on the Motion to Dismiss, in which his demeanor radically changed, according to Dr. Orly Taitz, esq., lead counsel for the Plaintiffs.
Siddharth Velamoor is the lawyer chosen by Carter to serve as one of his two official clerks, from Oct. 1, 2009, till Sept. 30, 2010, according to Wikipedia. Velamoor is listed as an associate with Perkins Coie, LLP’s office in Seattle, Washington. It is not clear if he has broken his relations with the firm.
Robert F. Bauer, is a partner of Perkins Coie, LLP’s office in Washington, D.C.. His bio at the company identifies him as holding the Chair of the Political Law group at the firm; general counsel to Obama’…