OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

Scheduling barnett v Dunn, Bowen for October 25th will dienfranchise the absentee voters

Posted on | June 16, 2010 | 2 Comments

Hearing Date Law Violation
InboxX

 Reply |Mike to Orly, me
show details 11:03 PM (9 hours ago)
One thing is for sure. They are disenfranchising those voters who voted by absentee ballot. Those ballots would surely have to be printed before Oct 25 ( see below ). So, does the court already have its mind made up – before any evidence is heard – that it is not going to remove him from the ballot, thus it is not concerned about disenfranchising those absentee voters ? By just scheduling the hearing for Oct 25, the court is disenfranchising absentee voters – a violation of Federal Law. Election day is Nov 2 ,2010. So the ballots for absentee voters must be sent to them by Sept 2. 2010 ( which means they have to be printed before that date ). Scheduling the hearing for Oct 25, after the absentee ballots are sent out, could possibly deny these voters their right to vote. You should use this argument in an appeal to get the date changed.
California Elections Code :

It is the intent and purpose of the Legislature that thischapter facilitate the federal mandate of the Uniformed and OverseasCitizens Absentee Voting Act (Public Law 99-410).
3304.  (a) Any application made pursuant to this chapter that isreceived by the elections official prior to the 60th day before theelection shall be kept and processed on or after the 60th day before
the election.   (b) The elections official shall send with the ballot a list ofall candidates who have qualified for the ballot by the 60th daybefore the election and for whom the voter is qualified to vote.  The
voter shall be entitled to write in the name of any specificcandidate seeking the nomination or election to any office listed onthe ballot.

Category: Uncategorized

Comments

2 Responses to “Scheduling barnett v Dunn, Bowen for October 25th will dienfranchise the absentee voters”

  1. Veritas
    June 16th, 2010 @ 10:19 am

    and in Port Chester, NY, a town north of NYC, Latinos were given each Six Votes by a federal judge in order go get greater minority participation on the town board.

    It is called “Cumulative voting” but it is VOTER FRAUD and an assault on our time honored tradition of one person one vote!

    According to a FOX NEWS story:

    Cumulative voting has been used to elect the school board in Amarillo, Texas, the county commission in Chilton County, Ala., and the City Council in Peoria, Ill.
    ————-

    It is absolutely an insult to representative democracy, just as is the COMMUNIST SEQUIOA fiasco…we are being overthrown.

  2. Xenon
    June 16th, 2010 @ 6:10 pm

    Pam should file a first amended complaint and moot the demurrer. Also, she should start discovery! This is a Titanic battle that you and Pam must win! We need Orly Taitz as our Secretary of State! (Hillary is doing a crappy job.)

Leave a Reply