Dr. Orly Taitz, Esquire

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2010


World's Leading Obama Eligibility Challenge Web Site


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.

Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.

Contact Dr. Taitz at
orlytaitz@hushmail.com or orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi


Urgent bar complaint against Gary Kreep for colluding with Berg and Liberi

Posted on | June 15, 2012 | No Comments

Bar complaint against Kreep

DR ORLY TAITZ, ESQ

29839 SANTA MARGARITA STE 100

RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA CA 92688

PHONE 949-683-5411 FAX 949-766-7687

06.15.2012

URGENT COMPLAINT OF VIOLATION OF ATTORNEY ETHICS AND POSSIBLE TURPITUDE BY ATTORNEY GARY KREEP BAR LICENSE NUMBER 66482 (HEREINAFTER KREEP). THE COMPLAINT IS URGENT, AS ATTORNEY KREEP IS   CURRENTLY RUNNING FOR A JUDGE IN RAMONA, SAN DIEGO COUNTY. AT THE INITIAL COUNT ON JUNE 5TH HE WAS AHEAD, AND IF ELECTED, HE WILL HAVE MULTIPLE LIVES IN HIS HANDS.

The complaint deals with actions by Kreep, where he knowingly and with malice is colluding with a known convicted document forger Lisa Liberi and an unethical attorney Philip Berg, who is employing this forger as his paralegal, and bringing forward a complaint and pleadings, knowing that Liberi was convicted in 2008 of 10 counts of forgery and theft. What’s more, on February 2010 during a disciplinary hearing of the Disciplinary board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania  for Kreep’s co-council, Philip Berg, Berg admitted that he defrauded the Disciplinary Board. Fraud consisted of Berg and Liberi manufacturing letters, supposedly existing 2 years earlier, using those letters to defraud the Disciplinary Board and accuse Berg’s client, whistleblower of crimes. Berg submitted  manufactured letters, claiming that a client was advised that her case was dismissed. Berg and Liberi submitted those letters under penalty of perjury in order to cover up ethics violations, which threaten Berg with disbarment. During February 2010 Disciplinary hearing Berg admitted that he lied to the Disciplinary Board  and falsely accused  his client of fraud and perjury.

Berg and Liberi continue the same behavior in another case, currently transferred in CA, where Kreep serves as a co-counsel.

I am an attorney, who has public interest civil rights legal actions. Kreep and Berg had similar actions. Apparently Kreep and Berg felt jealous of media attention and some donations  I was getting. Berg colluded with my former web master, where this web master locked me out of the web site of my foundation and continued soliciting donations using the name of my foundation and the old web site. She also used the same old web site to defame me and promote Berg.

I advised Berg that he needs to cease and desist using the web site which was created for my foundation. I also advised the public that the web master in question is no longer associated with my foundation. I advised the public that the old web site is being used by this former web master to advertise an attorney, Philip Berg, who is submitting documents to court and who is engaged in fundraising, while using as his paralegal Lisa Liberi, who was recently convicted of 10 counts of forgery and theft.   

In order to save face and continue collecting donations. Berg filed a SLAPP law suit, manufacturing a story that Lisa Liberi in question is a different person, a different Lisa Liberi and that he and his paralegal Liberi were defamed. At recent court hearing it was already proved that this is indeed the same Liberi who got convicted of 10 felony counts in CA and got 8 year prison term, which was reduced to 3 years probation due to her alleged health problems.

When the case was transferred to CA, Kreep joined Berg as local co-counsel in order to give Berg an opportunity to obtain pro hac vice and continue harassing me and multiple individuals with a bogus law suits.

Kreep’s actions are motivated solely by greed, envy and malice. As a licensed CA attorney he had a duty to do rule 11 investigation and not proceed with a bogus law suit. Any cursory investigation would show that the case is a nothing but slander brought with malice. Please, see the following exhibits:

1. Please, see an e-mail from captain Pamela Barnett. Barnett forwarded to Kreep a report by an investigator made during February 10, 2012 Disciplinary hearing of Philip Berg where Berg admitted to defrauding his client and the disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Barnett demanded that Kreep withdraw as a CA attorney co-counsel from a case, where innocent individuals are being harassed by an unethical Philadelphia attorney Berg and a forger and thief Liberi. Kreep ignored this notification by Barnett.

2. E-mail from me with the same information, which was ignored by Kreep.

3. Full case of the disciplinary charges against Berg, answer and transcript of February 10, 2012 hearing.

4. Oder by Judge Robreno, and transcript of December 20, 2012 hearing, where Liberi admitted to being a felon from CA and web master Ostella testified that allegations were not brought by her, but were manufactured by Berg and Liberi. After this order by judge Robreno, a court transcript was falsified, 14 pages of transcript were removed by a court reporter Dona Anders. After I threatened to go to authorities. Anders forwarded to me a full report. There is a suspicion, that just as Berg is colluding with forger Liberi to submit manufactured letters and defraud multiple courts, there is a collusion with a court reporter to falsify a court transcript in order to cover up fabricated allegations by Berg and Liberi. Kreep is on notice  of all of the above and continues as a co-counsel with Berg and a counsel for Liberi.      

5. Kreep was put on notice that  in the same case Berg and Liberi are accusing multiple innocent individuals of serious crimes and causing enormous emotional distress and financial damage. Kreep continues as a co-counsel, whie he is aware of the following:

a. In this case Kreep, Berg and Liberi accused my husband, a computer engineer of colluding with a computer giant Oracle to create a software to illegally get Liberi’s private information, even though all her information was provided by Liberi, herself, in her criminal case and her bankruptcy petitions. Kreep colluded in harassing my husband, causing damage to his company, to Oracle and many other companies, named by Kreep and Berg. The only reason for this baseless harassment of my husband, was jealousy towards me due to media attention and some donations received by me. Kreep showed no scruples, no moral values in causing a nightmare to my husband. Luckily the case against my husband and Oracle was already dismissed by judge Guilford.

b.     Kreep, Berg, Liberi and Ostella manufactured baseless accusations against a licensed investigator Neil Sankey, accusing him of breaking into Liberi’s computer, even though all of Liberi’s information is readily available in public records. dealing with law suit caused Mr. Sankey enormous emotional distress and financial hardship, which lead to bankruptcy.

c. The same case included bogus allegations of crimes against a whistleblower Linda Belcher. This lead to financial devastation of Belcher and a stroke, suffered by her.

d. The same case involved bogus allegations against talk show host Ed Hale, his wife and a radio station, where he worked. Hale suffered a heart attack and he and his wife filed for bankruptcy. Similarly, a veteran, former pilot and retired engineer Mr. Neil Turner, (resident of CA)  was accused of being a white militia separatist, threatening Liberi, Captain Pamela Barnett (resident of CA) was accused of manufacturing a letter from another individual, retired engineer Norman Murray was accused of manufacturing a letter from another person.    

e. The same case involved bogus allegations against Lexis-Nexis, Intellius, Reid-Elsevier and a number of other entities, which were already dismissed by judge Guilford

f. The same case involved the most outrageous accusations against me. When I filed a motion to dismiss the case on 12b, lack of subject matter jurisdiction due to lack of diversity of citizenship, Berg and Liberi made up a story that they should not present to the judge Liberi’s drivers license from May of 2009, when the case was filed, to show diversity of state citizenship, because attorney Orly Taitz tried to hire a hit man to kill Liberi and kidnap children of Ostella. For that reason they should not show Liberi’s drivers’ license and the court should believe their word.  

California attorney Gary Kreep put his name and California bar license under this garbage and this attorney might become a judge in the near future. This is absolutely frightening. It is mind boggling that a person like this will be allowed to become a judge.         

 If Kreep becomes a judge, lives of multiple individuals can be ruined. Many lives are affected even now, with him being an attorney.    This matter requires urgent investigation, as Kreep might become a judge in near future. If he could show zero conscience, zero integrity and zero moral values in attacking multiple innocent individuals with a bogus law suit, colluding with a dangerous criminal and another attorney without ethics, he can inflict much more damage to the society as a judge. While I agreed with the subject matter of some other cases brought by Kreep, his latest actions are so outrageous that I cannot be silent and an urgent attention is needed.

I trust the disciplinary counsel of the CA bar with review this matter with the outmost urgency.

Sincerely,

Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

cc

1. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme court of Pennsylvania

2. District Attorney San Diego county, CA

3. District Attorney Philadelphia, PA

4. Disciplinary committee of the US District Court, Central District CA

6. Disciplinary committee 9th Circuit Court of Appeals

7. Disciplinary board 3rd District Court of Appeals

Share
Category: Uncategorized

Comments

Leave a Reply