8 Responses to “MS letter from Tepper to Fuddy”

1. The Truth
   November 1st, 2012 @ 5:20 am

   Hawaii will send the same verification letter to Tepper as they did to the moron Secretary of State in Arizona, and Tepper knows this. This document will prove NOTHING!

2. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
   November 1st, 2012 @ 5:45 am

   of course, a verification of forgery from a corrupt official, who released this forgery in the first place

3. js
   November 1st, 2012 @ 11:00 am

   Verification of information contain in the LFBC is not the same as vlidation of the existence of this exact document on file in the DOH vault in the State of Hawaii.

   It also fails to require that “all” the information contained is the exact same as what is on file.

   What a goof.

4. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
   November 1st, 2012 @ 11:31 am

   look at the picture. I need all layers, I need sceenshots of all the layers and explanation for the judge

5. charade
   November 7th, 2012 @ 4:00 pm

   After reading Teppers letter to Fuddy it is a strange request to seek a VERIFICATION instead of a CERTIFIED COPY to be provided by Fuddy to Tepper.
   If a STRONG legal position is to be maintained, why would anyone request a VERIFICATION instead of a CERTIFIED COPY which the requestor [Tepper] said that he was entitled to under Hawaii law, according to [Tepper’s] quote of the Hawaii law.

   Maybe someone has the answer to the question of seeking a VERIFICATION vice a CERTIFIED COPY, where a CERTIFIED COPY would be the stronger evidentiary procedure to adhere to.

6. charade
   November 7th, 2012 @ 4:07 pm

   A CERTIFIED COPY received by Tepper COULD hang the USURPER, because a CERTIFIED COPY presented to the court would prove a BC forgery or the lack of a CERTIFIED COPY request MUST be indicative that VALID BC is NON-EXISTANT.

   If the following question is posed to the Judge… “why is it that defendant counsel DID NOT request a CERTIFIED COPY to be provided as evidence to the court,instead of a BC VERIFICATION? IS THERE INFORMATION ON THE NON-EXISTANT BC THAT WOULD PROVE THE USURPER IS NOT AN AMERICAN CITIZEN, IF A ‘CERTIFIED COPY WAS PROVIDED IN LIEU OF A VERIFICATION OF EXISTING PDF VERSIONS OF THE NON-EXISTANT BC?

7. charade
   November 7th, 2012 @ 4:26 pm

   After posting the VERIFICATION vs CERTIFIED COPY argument…maybe the post should NOT be published… it’s your call… good luck

8. charade
   November 7th, 2012 @ 6:20 pm

   BTW! Tepper’s brief addresses the VERIFICATION vs CERTIFIED COPY OF THE BC.
   Any court could IMO abrogate the narrowed application of that Hawaii BC law due to the fact that the USURPER’s WHOLE LEGACY is being put in jeopardy…and the BC law was not put there to defend a CRIMINAL act… therefore … a CERTIFIED COPY BC should be ordered by a court.

Leave a Reply