12 Responses to “Farrar et al v Obama Motion to dismiss Farrar GA Sup Court”

1. The Truth
   February 27th, 2012 @ 2:56 pm

   Geeeez!
   What a load if crap this is! Now wouldn’t it have been a lot easier, less time consuming, and less expensive for Obama to just submit a certified copy of his birth certificate?
   Oh, I forgot! We are all crazy, and he and his supporters are the sane ones. Nevermind.

2. William Reade
   February 27th, 2012 @ 3:47 pm

   In reply to Mr. MICHAEL JABLONSKI
   Georgia State Bar Number 38585o
   zzzr-D Peachfee Road NE
   Atlant4 Georgia 3o3o9
   404-29o-29n
   michael jablonski@comcast.net

   I believe you have made some egregious and blatant errors, his citizenship is being questioned however, and it is his Natural Born status that is the subject of the suit. You, Like many others or obsessed by the word “Citizen” rather than “Natural Born Citizen” which is the bone of contention. I would like to offer you something to research, for your own peace of mind:
   I have been following the election of Mr. Obama with puzzlement as we have
   similar backgrounds. His Mother was born in the United States and his Father was a
   Kenyan/British subject/citizen. His Mother however, was not of age to meet the

   residency requirements to convey Citizenship….. “providing the U.S. Citizen parent had, prior to the birth of the child, been physically present in the United States for a period of ten years, at least five years of which were after the American parent reached the age of fourteen.”
   She was 18 years of age and in the country only 4 (four) Years after her 14th birthday.
   Transmission Requirements for U.S. Citizenship:
   “Child born in wedlock to one U.S. citizen parent and one non-U.S. Citizen parent between December 24, 1952 and November 13, 1986: …………………….., may be entitled to citizenship providing the U.S. Citizen parent had, prior to the birth of the child, been physically present in the United States for a period of ten years, at least five years of which were after the American parent reached the age of fourteen.”

   Text of the 14th Amendment
   Section 1.
   All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.
   United States Attorney General, George Williams, ………………………….., ruled in 1873 the word “jurisdiction” under the Fourteenth Amendment “must be understood to mean absolute and complete jurisdiction, such as the United States had over its citizens before the adoption of this amendment.” He added, “Political and military rights and duties do not pertain to anyone else.”
   Rep. John A. Bingham commenting on Section 1992 said it means “every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen.” (Cong. Globe, 39th, 1st Sess., 1291 (1866))
   When Mr Obama was born in 1961 he was a British Citizen by Descent, as he and his Father where subject to the:
   British Nationality Act, 1948
   PART II
   CITIZENSHIP OF THE UNITED KINGDOM AND COLONIES.
   Citizenship by birth or descent.

   4. Subject to the provisions of this section, every person born within the United Kingdom and Colonies after the commencement of this Act shall be a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by birth:

   5.—(1) Subject to the provisions of this section, a person born after the commencement of this Act shall be a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by descent if his father is a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies at the time of the birth:

   I provide you this only so you can search you conciseness and weigh your motives.

3. Jim Black
   February 27th, 2012 @ 4:47 pm

   Jablonski knows exactly what you’re talking about but must of necessity ignore Obama’s lack of natural born citizeship. Of course, he didn’t address Obama’s other crimes. He’s DOA if a judge somewhere can be found to rule justly on NBC.

4. Donna L. Schoenig
   February 27th, 2012 @ 6:09 pm

   my comments have not benn able to post here – so this is a test – ‘we’ still have not proof that Obama Sr. (which really wasn’t his legal name) was Barack’s birth father – so, ‘what if’ his birth father was Malcolm X – – that would put a different spin on the eligibility issue wouldn’t it?

5. Donna L. Schoenig
   February 27th, 2012 @ 6:14 pm

   WOW! my comment posted – pardin the typo – ought to have been ‘been’ not benn – ALSO, there still has been no proof that Stanley Ann was B.O.’s birth mother – she literally disappeared after supposedly being approximately 3 months pregnant and wasn’t seen again until fall of 1961 (Obama’s supposed birth year) at the University of Washington.

6. Nutmegger
   February 27th, 2012 @ 6:15 pm

   Hi folks. Lets all claim what he claims is a false claim, and go from there. Sounds ok to me.

7. Sam
   February 27th, 2012 @ 6:21 pm

   Wow, no doubt it will be dismissed. Well written and researched. Orly, I think you lost this one. It will be dismissed.

8. kelley
   February 27th, 2012 @ 8:07 pm

   I read the first couple of pages wherein it lists all of the lawsuits filed against the usurper and couldn’t read anymore because I said if he had a birth certificate it’s obvious the crook would have shown it rather than have all these suits filed. He’s a real work also known as an absolute liar!

9. orly taitz
   February 28th, 2012 @ 4:42 am

   written like a true Obot. any attorney knows, that what was written by Jablonski is a copmplete garbage and BS. It will be dismissed, if the judge is as corrupt as Malihi and other puppet judges. A lot of corrupt judges belong in prison with Obama. The judge is a liberal Democrat, she will decide for Obama no matter what

10. orly taitz
    February 28th, 2012 @ 4:44 am

    nobody saw any files from a doctor, who gave birth from a pediatrician. those communists raised each others babies. William Ayers raised the child of Boudin

11. orly taitz
    February 28th, 2012 @ 4:45 am

    the whole Malcolm X story is a hoax, I already exposed it

12. RacerJim
    February 28th, 2012 @ 8:29 am

    Quotes from “Brief in Support of Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss” by Mr. Michael Jablonski — and my responses thereto.

    “Not a single challenge has ever
    been upheld.” — Not a single challenge to the Earth being flat was upheld until the 15th Century.

    “An effort to harass the President continues with qualification challenges filed
    across the country and in Georgia.” — Respondent’s efforts to thwart eligibility challenges across the country, including Georgia, continues.

    “Challengers ignore procedural and evidentiary
    requirements because their claims are without merit, based on fantasy, and offered in
    pursuit of a political agenda.” — Respondent ignored Georgia Administrative Law Judge’s subpoena to appear and Georgia Election Law requiring respondent to prove eligibility after being challenged because respondent’s opinions are without merit, based on misrepresentation and obfuscation, and offered in pursuit of continuing to violate the United States Constitution.

    “President Obama was a United States citizen from the moment of his birth in
    Hawaii. Since he held citizenship from birth, all Constitutional qualifications have been
    met. — In failing to appear at a Georgia Ballot Eligibility Hearing as ordered by the Georgia Administrative Law Judge presiding over said hearing Respondent failed to meet his obligation to prove eligibility persuant to Georgia Election Law and, therefore, effectively legally declared (by ommission) that he cannot prove eligibility.

    CONCLUSION
    During the 2008 election cycle the Chairman and the Secretary of Respondent’s own party in Respondent’s alleged birth State signed, had certified and then submitted to the Chief Elections Official of Hawaii an “Official Certificate Of Nomination” which, due to absence of the wordage “…under provisions of the United States Constitution.” as required under Hawaii Election Law, effectively certified Obama as not eligible to serve as POTUS per the U.S. Constitution.

Leave a Reply