7 Responses to “Appeal to Secretary of State Kemp”

1. Colin R. Tanner
   February 4th, 2012 @ 10:56 am

   Dear Mr Kemp,

   I was very surprised and upset at the recent decision by Judge Mailihi regarding the Obama elegibility case. There seems to be a complete breakdown of the Judicial System in the USA. Where can a resposible American Citizen go within the USA and expect to get a Constitutional ruling anymore?

   It is very sad to see this happening right in front of our eye’s.

   I hope therefor, that you can at least add some sanity to all of this and Ban Obama from appearing on the Georgia ballot. Especially since all of the evidence presented so far points to Obama not being elegible according to the Constitution of the United States to even be President.

   Sincerely,

   Colin R. Tanner
   Retired.

2. Gary Dugas
   February 4th, 2012 @ 10:57 am

   That’s more like it. The appeal is great, now you need media and social network coverage.

3. Geir Smith
   February 4th, 2012 @ 11:17 am

   Obama Antichrist

4. S. Steinberg
   February 4th, 2012 @ 11:33 am

   Orly,

   I just read your online appeals-document addressed to Brian Kemp. Excellent that it lays out the specifics of the matter, in eminently readable and unavoidable clarity, such that everyone who’s interested can now read and easily understand for himself/herself what’s going on and can do so WITHOUT having to have it all “filtered” through some “media analysts”.

   So, GO FOR IT!

   But, too, now the issue is: how will Brian Kemp respond?

   Honorably and in a manner that is judicially and ethically respectful of and responsive to your charges?

   Or might he “find a way” to:

   (a) uphold Malihi’s ruling, or:

   (b) rule that his (Kemp’s) office need not rule (or is legally prohibited from ruling) in this matter at all, or:

   (c) “kick it down the road” and perhaps into such a tangled mass of abstruse regulations that the whole issue gets interminably (or at least until after the upcoming Presidential election) mired in the quicksand of bureaucracy and time?

   I’m not a lawyer, but as a journalist I’ve seen cases where such things have happened. In one particular case that I recall, the lower court judge had so cleverly constructed his decisions — which had a very real and long-lasting devastating effect against the plaintiff — that the Appeals Court, to which the plaintiff then brought the matter, ruled THAT IT COULD NOT RULE IN THIS MATTER BECAUSE THE LOWER COURT JUDGE HAD NOT MADE THOSE RULINGS A “FINAL” PART OF HIS “FINAL RULE”!

   Result: the lower court judge’s extremely harsh rulings against the (innocent, in my view) plaintiff CONTINUED TO OPERATE, WITHOUT END, ruining this poor woman’s life, with no relief in sight.

   Alice in Wonderland? How about Alice in Bizarroland? But there it was.

   Hopefully, however, Mr. Kemp, receiving and reviewing your appeal-request, will act honorably and do his best to reach a fair and just decision.

   But Orly, if I may, I would like to offer you a few additional observations of my own, as to some of the points that you raised in your appeals-document:

   To wit: Denigrating the “truck driver”, in the Indiana case, seems to me to go precisely AGAINST what I gather is your effort to UPHOLD the rights of “the common man (and woman)” in the Obama case. If I were the one writing the appeal, I might even PRAISE the “truck driver” for seeking to obtain — and at his own expense — justice via the courts; if relevant, I would submit that his effort only serves to SYMBOLIZE and SUPPORT the principles that the plaintiffs in the Georgia case — i.e., “the People” — are also seeking to uphold: the principles of HONESTY IN GOVERNMENT and the FREEDOM OF THE PEOPLE TO KNOW THE TRUTH.

   But beyond that, I would also — somewhat as you’ve done — “go for the judicial jugular”: I would tear into the alleged (by the Georgia judge) authority, relevance, and validity of the Indiana case in regard to the current Georgia case. And I would especially hit at the Georgia judge’s reliance on an abstruse other-state’s judicial ruling, via these two points:

   (a) the Indiana case — as you well stated — was never “presented into evidence” and thus this factor alone provides immediate grounds for appeal (and for a charge that the Georgia court judge committed judicial misconduct in how he reached a decision in the case), and:

   (b) if anything, why should another state’s laws take precedence over Georgia’s OWN state laws, particularly insofar (as you’ve also stated in your appeal) as Georgia has, on the books, a specific law that already requires candidates for political office to provide affirmative proof that they meet all official qualifications for the office that they seek?

   (c) One additional thought — but I leave it to you, as you’re a lawyer and I am not, to judge how it would play out: Is it reasonable, in the judicial sense, to also argue that the Georgia court judge’s reliance on the judicial ruling of another state, may also have been in violation of precedent and of standard judicial procedure, in that he erred by turning to another state’s law rather than by turning to the “superior”, “controlling”, decisions of the Federal judiciary and even of the United States Supreme Court?

   In that question, I can see that the answer, whichever it may be, perhaps can both support your argument as well as, possibly, backfire against it, as the issue also comes down to one of “Who controls? The states, or The State?”. But what do you think?

5. DLK
   February 4th, 2012 @ 12:00 pm

   Keep going, only 56 more states to go. Surely he can’t bully all of them. Go Orly!

6. James Durwood johnson
   February 4th, 2012 @ 1:20 pm

   Dear Orly,
   I just finished reading your Appeal to the Georgia, Secretary of State, Brian Kemp.

   Fantastic work! You didn’t leave SOS Kemp any legal wiggling room. You have put him in such a position, for him to rule against you he’ll have to violate his oath in office. I hope he takes his oath in office seriously.

7. Jim Black
   February 4th, 2012 @ 2:04 pm

   Unless the MSM begins to report on what’s been happening, which isn’t likely, and courts start judging fairly, which isn’t likely either, it’s going to be an uphill fight.

   “Because the sentence of a crime is not quickly executed, the feet of men are swift to do evil.” (Eccl. 8:11)

Leave a Reply