Posted on | October 30, 2009 | 1 Comment
Sovereign Soul |
Submitted on 2009/10/30 at 6:13pm
<> Has anyone else observed the MOST inappropriate “judicial” language being used by BOTH Judges Carter and Lamb? I’ll guess that neither of them in their history as judges EVER wrote or spoke with such disdain for the rights of either a defending or plaintiff attorney. IMO, the “tone” can only be attributed to “some outside influence”. Or, could it be that both Judges wanted their denials to be so outrageous that the case(s)could easily qualify for submission to the Supreme Court? Again, IMO, the judges err in “thinking” that these cases have an intent (as opposed to a consequence) of impeaching a president. As I, a layman, follow the proceedings, I can see that all efforts have been directed as opening up the records so the truth can be known. With the TRUTH exposed, it’s then up to the Congress to do what they will, or, will NOT do. “We the People” will then know how to vote for our Senators and Representatives at the next elections based on how they individually responded to the truth. So far, the judiciary in their so-called “according to the Constitution” responses have totally abrogated the concept of “checks and balances” that the founders so carefully authored by evading their mandated Constitutional authority. That’s my “take” on it anyway. “Ye SHALL know the truth and the TRUTH WILL set you free” — a Law of Nature, if you will. |
Comments
One Response to “”
October 30th, 2009 @ 11:31 pm
Your first paragraph contains a completely good idea. What a brilliant stroke!. ‘There’s nothing as amazing as common sense’, someone said. And even ‘message shirts’ should be made up and worn with the comparison printed on them.
Should Carter be black… and I don’t know if… then he would understand what is meant in this case by ‘It looks like Mastah got to Granny’.