OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

Posted on | October 30, 2009 | 1 Comment

tp

Carter = Grow a SPINE, you hypocrite!
1
Category: Uncategorized

Comments

One Response to “”

  1. Sovereign Soul
    October 30th, 2009 @ 6:13 pm

    <>
    ——————-
    I see that we have someone talented in the advertising business. May we draw on his expertise to develop a “handout” or something that we could send on the web … it could go viral, that would COMPARE Judge Carter’s language at the FIRST hearing in September, with his REVERSAL of this week. The change of HEART can, most likely, be attributed to the fact that he had a full month to be worked over by the defense attorneys. They even got one of their sympathizers hired to WORK IN THE OFFICE of the Judge, f’gosh sakes!

    Has anyone else observed the MOST inappropriate “judicial” language being used by BOTH Judges Carter and Lamb? I’ll guess that neither of them in their history as judges EVER wrote or spoke with such disdain for the rights of either a defending or plaintiff attorney. IMO, the “tone” can only be attributed to “some outside influence”.

    Or, could it be that both Judges wanted their denials to be so outrageous that the case(s)could easily qualify for submission to the Supreme Court?

    Again, IMO, the judges err in “thinking” that these cases have an intent (as opposed to a consequence) of impeaching a president. As I, a layman, follow the proceedings, I can see that all efforts have been directed as opening up the records so the truth can be known. With the TRUTH exposed, it’s then up to the Congress to do what they will, or, will NOT do.

    “We the People” will then know how to vote for our Senators and Representatives at the next elections based on how they individually responded to the truth.

    So far, the judiciary in their so-called “according to the Constitution” responses have totally abrogated the concept of “checks and balances” that the founders so carefully authored by evading their mandated Constitutional authority. That’s my “take” on it anyway.

    “Ye SHALL know the truth and the TRUTH WILL set you free” — a Law of Nature, if you will.