OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi


Days before the election CA attorney Lisa Bloom sought to pay $750,000 to women to state they had sex with Trump. Why isn’t FBI raiding Bloom’s office for collusion to make a de facto illegal contribution to Clinton’s campaign?

Posted on | April 22, 2018 | 7 Comments

Days before the election CA attorney Lisa Bloom sought to pay $750,000 to women to state they had sex with Trump. Why isn’t FBI raiding Bloom’s office for collusion to make a de facto illegal contribution for Clinton’s campaign?

@realDonaldTrump Days before the election CA attorney Lisa Bloom sought to pay $750,000 to women to state they had sex with Trump. Why isn’t FBI raiding Bloom’s office for collusion to make a de facto illegal contribution for Clinton’s campaign?https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/365068-exclusive-prominent-lawyer-sought-donor-cash-for-two-trump-accusers

Comments

7 Responses to “Days before the election CA attorney Lisa Bloom sought to pay $750,000 to women to state they had sex with Trump. Why isn’t FBI raiding Bloom’s office for collusion to make a de facto illegal contribution to Clinton’s campaign?”

  1. lulu
    April 22nd, 2018 @ 1:22 pm

    would she – did she
    do the same when obama was elected?

  2. Midnight Cat
    April 22nd, 2018 @ 4:31 pm

    As soon as Trump took office…

    Sessions/Rosenstein should have clean house at the DOJ.

    Then, they should have checked all back legal activity, so they could begin their new jobs with a clean slate…

    And anything that needed to be addressed and solved, should have been taken care of…

    So Trump wouldn’t be bothered by all the road blocks he’s been stumped with.

    Trump has had to face one treasonous swamp scourge after another!

  3. Midnight Cat
    April 23rd, 2018 @ 12:19 am

    And the Bar Association should also be finding out why she thinks she can do things like this, in the first place?

    See how far the liberal/left think they have all this leaway with doing what they want????

    They have no self-discipline!

  4. Uncle Charles
    April 23rd, 2018 @ 1:57 pm

    Wow!

    A female attorney did this?

    What are the odds??? LOL!

  5. Madi
    April 23rd, 2018 @ 3:56 pm

    FBI and CIA colluded and hided information on Barry Soetoro …

  6. Ray
    April 25th, 2018 @ 1:55 pm

    Maybe Barry played “hided and go seek”

  7. Starlight
    April 26th, 2018 @ 2:38 pm

    What is puzzling to me is how all of these

    women, (and I would label them

    differently, if I dared), would do on

    a lie detector test. Supposedly, these

    tests are accurate and all of this foolishness

    would be put to rest in the length of time

    it takes to administer tests to a half dozen

    lying females.

    Why is this not used as a deterrent

    for other accusers, as well as a legal

    means of solving this once and for all.

    Maybe I am in error believing these tests

    can be used in a court room. If so,

    then they might as well be banned

    forever and never considered again

    as a path to finding the truth.

Leave a Reply