Posted on | May 2, 2012 | 4 Comments
7:49 AM (1 hour ago)
Dear Orly Taitz:
Today we published the case TAITZ v. DUNN on Leagle.com.
As an attorney representing one of the parties in this case, we welcome any comments you would like to make via the “Comment” tab found above the case caption.
Leagle provides public online access to primary case law from all federal courts and all state higher courts. Our collection is up to date within 24 hours of the release of opinions, and we offer comprehensive collections of both federal and state courts decisions. We add slip opinions daily, and advance sheets and bound volume copies as they become available.
If you have any questions or comments, we would be pleased to hear from you and discuss how we may assist.
Orly Taitz 9:44 AM (0 minutes ago)
Dear editor of Leagal.com
I greatly appreciate your interest in my elections law cases. I am publishing your inquiry and my response on my web site OrlyTaitzESQ.com, which currently has over 30 million recorded reader visits. It is also forwarded to some 30,000 outlets of the US and international media
Recent decision in Dunn case is beyond outrageous, it is an embarrassment to the US judiciary, it shows that the 3 judges of the Court of Appeals either never read the complaint, absolutely clueless, what is in the complaint, never saw it or are attempting to defraud the public by saying that Taitz never claimed fraud until Dunn brought his motion to dismiss on the pleadings
The complaint is readily available in the court records of the Superior court. Anyone can pay a couple of dollars and get a copy of the complaint in court or download it on line. There are multiple causes of action of fraud in the complaint, which was filed in June of 2010. Additionally, the court completely missed the mark on the main issue: leave to amend. They provided zero argument, why this complaint or some technical deficiencies could not be cured by a leave to amend. When a complaint can be cured by an amendment, failure to grant leave to amend represents an abuse of judicial discretion. We see a long pattern of abuses of judicial discretion in elections fraud cases.
This decision shows that the US judiciary condones and encourages elections fraud.
We see it in the embarrassing decisions made in Dunn case and in recent decision in Farrar et al v Obama et al in the administrative court of GA. (see attached). In that case I represented GA voters and Presidential candidates challenging Obama on the ballot. I issued subpoenas. Obama challenged my subpoenas with motion to quash. Presiding judge ruled in my favor and Obama was supposed to appear in court and provide true and correct certified copies of his CT Social Security number 042-68-4425, which he is using since around 1980, but which was never assigned to Bearck Obama acording to e-verify and SSNVS. I also sought a certified copy of his birth certificate, as an alleged copy waived by him in the press conference a year go and posted on line on whiteHouse.gov, is deemed to be a computer generated forgery by multiple experts and recently Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County AZ confirmed that both the alleged birth certificate and the alleged Selective Service Certificate of Obama are computer generated forgeries. Obama attempted to cancel the proceedings by writing to the Secretary of State. His request was denied. According to GA law and precedents it was the burden of the candidate to show that he is eligible to the office according to the Constitution and the existing statutes. I presented 7 witnesses (I have the video tape of the trial and can provide it to you, I need your mailing address ). One of the witnesses was a senior deportation officer with 30 years of experience John Sampson, who testified that there are multiple signs of forgery in Obama’s identification papers and in cases like this he would normally seek a warrant for arrest and deportation. I had a witness testifying that she ran Obama’s E-verify, which showed that Obama does not even pass the e-verify. I had a witness testifying that in his mothers passport records Obama went by a different last name, soebarkah. Certified pasport records of Obama’s mother were provided. I had adobe illustrator expert from Indiana Technical institute testifying that Obama’s alleged copy of his birth certificate is a computer generated forgery. I had an investigator certified by the department of Homeland Security testifying that Obama is using a forged birth certificate. Obama presented nothing and a corrupt judge ruled that all of my experts were not convincing enough to him and he will allow Obama on the ballot. this shows the magnitude of corruption in the US judiciary.
With this level of corruption, fraud, forgery of records in our elections, in the highest positions of power and in the courts, we became a banana republic, an embarrassment to the judiciary and jurisprudence around the world and a laughing stock to free people everywhere.
I hope that attorneys reading Leagle.com will join my fight against elections fraud and judicial corruption.
We were able to prosecute Watergate because we had some honest attorneys, some honest judges some honest congressmen and reporters. Where are they now? Make no mistake about it, when the elections are corrupted and tainted by fraud, when corrupt judges are encouraging more fraud by their decisions, we lose all our rights, as we are governed by criminals who have no scruples, no conscience and they will take the rest of our civil, human, constitutional and economic rights without any hesitation.
If your readers would like to join my fight to clean up elections fraud and fight the judicial corruption, they can contact me at 949-683-5411 or firstname.lastname@example.org
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ