8 Responses to “4 star general just talked to an assistant of the Chief clerk William Suter regarding manipulation of docket in Taitz v adtrue, they are supposed to correct the docket so I can file a petition for Writ of Certiorari”

1. 2discern
   November 1st, 2012 @ 9:40 am

   The #1 question still unanswered- How did Barry Soetero (aka obama) get top security clearance?

   Will somebody of leadership in high ranks of military or enforcement agencies please answer the question. My CONgress members can’t (won’t) give a reply, calls to out of state CONgress members can’t answer it. How does a non-vetted putative POTUS get TOP security clearance? All his records are sealed as everyone knows. So, how were background checks completed? By whom?

   Will ONE major media network ask this simple fundamental question?

2. ken
   November 1st, 2012 @ 9:51 am

   Does this mean some high up people are getting pissed off with all this corruption?

3. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
   November 1st, 2012 @ 10:43 am

   I don’t know, I did not get the official response from the supreme Court yet

4. Bob69
   November 1st, 2012 @ 11:59 am

   2discern,

   I can answer that. Obama never took or was required to take even the lowest level security clearance…and if he had he of course would have flunked big-time. According to the first two pages of the Congressional Research Service document released to Congress in April 2009 there is no requirement, zero, ziltch, nada for the elected president to take or pass any kind of security clearance. They are simply given anything they need or want because they are the putative president. I believe the same goes for members of the Senate and House. This is why Obama is the biggest security threat in the history of America.

   There is also no vetting of the presidential candidates on a federal level and little to none at state level. Good example would be the guy, last name Judd, who sent in a form and $2500 to West Virginia and appeared on the Democrat Primary ballot a few months ago. He got 41% of the vote against Obama in spite of the fact he was in a federal prison in Texarkana, Texas serving a 17 year sentence on a felony charge.

   What you may believe is happening to prevent this short of thing does not happen and in many cases there are not even any requirements that say it should happen.

5. Thomas The Paine
   November 1st, 2012 @ 1:59 pm

   2discern

   The answer to you question is NO ONE.

   There is no requirement for any background checks to become President.

   Normally the media doe this. In Obozo’s case, the Liberals wanted a black pResident so badly, that they would have endorsed Idi Amin if he had run.

6. 2discern
   November 1st, 2012 @ 2:55 pm

   Orly, you are fantastic in all your efforts. The most basic question of any logic by employers or voters, what is your background?

   This question posed to every CONgress member has yet to be answered. I called today offices of the most visible CONgressman on the Benghazi cover up and asked this question to a staffer.

   They don’t know how he passes security clearance. Most think it is automatic with the office. Now that is scary. A candidate with no credentials, sealed records of his entire past, a forged birth record, a fake ID, a fraudulent Select. Service registration and he he has access to global security issues without any vetting? Insane. Inexcusable. The election laws need more check points of veracity. The enemy is in the gates NOW !

7. Dennis Fitzpatrick
   November 1st, 2012 @ 3:28 pm

   Who’s going to be footing the bill for all these sanctions?

8. Kit Carson
   November 1st, 2012 @ 10:23 pm

   Orly: This is what the clerk needed to wake up! I hope this (4)-Star General gave this clerk a very serious case of Diahrrea!! This whole freakin’ Crisis needs a massive “B.M.!”

Leave a Reply