“The U.S. attorney stated at the hearing that there is no requirement for the U.S. president to have a valid birth certificate and a valid selective service certificate and a valid social security number; that the U.S. constitution does not state that the president is supposed to have valid papers.”
Although true, this defense is utterly absurd and totally IGNORES the fact that state ballot-challenge laws wisely and rightly place the burden of proof of true ones identity and legal eligibility for the office sought squarely on each CANDIDATE, not on those who CHALLENGE his eligibility. Thus, a candidate having no valid proof of his true identity and legal eligibility for the office sought cannot possibly hold that office! Judge England conveniently ignores the fact that the issue before him is NOT whether Barry Soetoro/Barack Hussein Obama/Harrison J. Bounell or whoever he is is required to possess a valid birth certificate, selective service certificate and social security number, but whether he has actually PROVEN his true identity and eligibility for office as REQUIRED by LAW! Given the obviously, incontrovertibly-fake, fraudulent “documents” he has foisted on an uninformed, unsuspecting public, the answer to that is obvious! As you and Kevin Davidson (a.k.a. “Dr. Conspiracy”) agreed, the computer-generated image posted by Obama on WhiteHouse.Gov is not an actual document, let alone a certified, certifiable copy, but a mere image having no legally-probative value. Thus, Obama has presented and proven ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!
Furthermore, I and many other angry tax-payers demand to know why judge England allowed a U.S. attorney to represent candidate Obama DESPITE the fact that that U.S. attorney freely admitted to the court that tax-supported attorneys are PROHIBITED from representing private citizens!
Judge England’s flawed logic and reasoning do not speak well for his intellectual honesty and integrity, and I fear he could be inflicting much harm on those who appear in his court seeking justice.