Posted on | November 11, 2012 | 2 Comments
Scott 33 approved |
Submitted on 2012/11/11 at 1:17 pm
I would like Fuddy to answer the question: Is the Registrars Stamp of Onaka on the BC posted by Obama a true and accurate representation of the stamp? Referring to (THE) being spelled “TXE” and the smiley face in the O of Onaka. Also is the BC number correct. The Nordyke numbers are lower despite their births being registered on August 11, 1962 vs Obama registration on August 08, 1961 …… Obviously when the very first Obama COLB was released to the public, they had NO IDEA that the Nordyke BC would come to light. This alone proves that the Obama BC is a forgery. |
Comments
2 Responses to “”
Leave a Reply
November 11th, 2012 @ 4:57 pm
What does a stamp have to do with that piece of garbage that Barrack HUSSEIN Obama presented to the American people on National Television on April 27, 2011.
You can stamp that piece of garbage 24/7 it never, ever is going to be anything but a piece of garbage.
Even Harry Houdini couldn’t turn that piece of garbage into a valid Birth Certificate.
November 12th, 2012 @ 12:53 am
I believe Obama is purposely making a “novelty” of a Hawaii BC. He has created an obvious forgery and wants everyone to know its not real. This shields him from being charged with creating a forgery. By placing it on T shirts , Mugs , and making fun of his birth place, he is openly admitting it’s a joke.
In the same way that you can’t make an exact copy of a $100 bill or you will be charged with forgery. Yet, if you alter it slightly in size and change the photo to Santa, it is a “novelty” item .
Changing the O in Onaka to a smiley face, using multiple type sets, and making the BC so obviously a forgery, he can claim later – ” I never tried to fool anyone, just look at it, who would not know that was just a novelty BC”
The mistake they made was submitting it to a Court. Prior to that, they never introduced it into evidence. The are now on record with it.