OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi



02.19.2013 order from the Supreme Court of the United States does not state whether the case was granted or denied, no answer yet, no treason yet by the justices of the Supreme Court. See the order at link below

Posted on | February 19, 2013 | 62 Comments

SCOTUS 02.19.2013 order does not state yet whether the case was granted or denied, no decision yet

Comments

62 Responses to “02.19.2013 order from the Supreme Court of the United States does not state whether the case was granted or denied, no answer yet, no treason yet by the justices of the Supreme Court. See the order at link below”

  1. Brian
    February 19th, 2013 @ 7:53 am

    do a docket search at the scotus website. It states the results.

  2. speedy
    February 19th, 2013 @ 7:54 am

    I found this on obamareleaseyourrecords website: 12A606 NOONAN, EDWARD, ET AL. V. BOWEN, CA SEC. OF STATE
    The applications for stay addressed to The Chief Justice and referred to the Court are denied. There was no recusal of the usurper appointed justices.

  3. Jim Duggan
    February 19th, 2013 @ 7:56 am
  4. Ray
    February 19th, 2013 @ 7:59 am

    ORYR is reporting that the Supreme Court has denied…..

  5. Helen Wait
    February 19th, 2013 @ 8:00 am

    I just checked the docket again and it does say that it was denied.

    Down at the very bottom it says –

    February 19, 2013 Application (12A606) denied by the Court

  6. Groucho Klarcks
    February 19th, 2013 @ 8:01 am

    What are you talking about? It lists two cases, and then says:

    “The applications for stay addressed to The Chief Justice and referred to the Court are denied.”

    How can it be any clearer?

  7. Helen Wait
    February 19th, 2013 @ 8:02 am
  8. Francisco
    February 19th, 2013 @ 8:03 am

    If the list given in this link, of all the cases heard by SCOTUS on Februray 15 is correct, what time period could have been seriously assigned to 12A606, to read the brief, look at the evidence, and read all the affitdavits ?

  9. Helen Wait
    February 19th, 2013 @ 8:07 am

    This what Lyle wrote on SCOTUS blog –

    9:50

    Lyle:
    In answer to a question, the Court denied a stay in the case of Noonan v. Bowen (12A606), but did not act on any other aspect of that case.

    What does it mean that the did not act on any other aspects of the case? What other aspects of the case remain? Do you think that they will announce today that Obama has been found guilty of fraud?

  10. richCares
    February 19th, 2013 @ 8:17 am

    here’s the Supreme Court order list
    http://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/021913zor_19m1.pdf
    denied

  11. Patty
    February 19th, 2013 @ 8:25 am

    The TWO stays of applications were combined, YOURS was denied

    12A606
    NOONAN, EDWARD, ET AL. V. BOWEN, CA SEC. OF STATE
    12A712
    KWASNIK, MAREK A. V. FNMA
    The applications for stay addressed to The Chief Justice and
    referred to the Court are denied.

  12. derek earl
    February 19th, 2013 @ 8:37 am

    docket states: 2-19-2013 – denied :(

  13. Dean
    February 19th, 2013 @ 8:45 am

    Orly, the last time I felt like this was in the waiting room the day of my daughter’s birth, 28 years ago…I can only imagine how you feel!!!

    WIN! JUST WIN, BABY!

  14. Verga Roja
    February 19th, 2013 @ 8:50 am

    This is huge! It looks like the Supreme Court needs more time to go over all the evidence you submitted. Either that or that Turkish clerk never even showed your file to them. If the case is denied, I would demand to see the signature of every Justice so that you can know who committed treason and who sided with you. I would bet that the ruling will be 5-4 either way.

  15. Lee Green
    February 19th, 2013 @ 8:52 am
  16. Perestroika
    February 19th, 2013 @ 8:53 am

    It was denied effective today.

  17. Enorme Pene
    February 19th, 2013 @ 8:58 am

    This is good news, no? If they have not made decision yet, then they are still pondering?

    My bet is that you will have decision in hand by end of day, early tomorrow of late, and it will be in favor of you.

    You are very important and judges would be stupid not to pay attention to your evidence.

  18. ted
    February 19th, 2013 @ 8:58 am
  19. bella
    February 19th, 2013 @ 9:02 am

    Feb 19 2013 Application (12A606) denied by the Court.

    http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/12a606.htm

  20. bella
    February 19th, 2013 @ 9:04 am

    “moderation” for the supreme court docket?

  21. Jim H
    February 19th, 2013 @ 9:04 am

    According to the SCOTUS’s website it was denied

  22. monica mimier
    February 19th, 2013 @ 9:34 am

    If the SCOTUS will not hear this case ,is it possible Judge Roy Moore, Alabama ,will look at it ?

  23. J Radin
    February 19th, 2013 @ 9:46 am

    “They range from a few million USD to more than a billion USD in the case of John Roberts.”

    “Slush fund accounts of major US politicians identified and seized at Vatican Bank (Rome). Connection established with Daniel Dal Bosco RICO indictment, which cites Giancarlo Bruno, Silvio Berlusconi & Ban Ki Moon. On Wednesday 5th January 2011, it emerged that US establishment-related slush fund accounts had been located in, and seized from, the Vatican Bank in Rome. The source of funds for these accounts in almost every instance was found to be the US Treasury. Beneficiaries of the covert Vatican accounts include Barack Obama, Michelle Obama and each of the Obama children, Michelle Obama’s mother, all the Bushes and the Clintons, including Chelsea Clinton, Joe Biden, Timothy Geithner, Janet Napolitano, several US Senators, including Mitch McConnell, several US Congressmen including John Boehner, several US Military Chiefs of Staff, the US Provost Marshal, the US Judge Advocate General, the US Supreme Court Chief Justice, John Roberts, several US Judges, the Pope, and several cardinals. Big money was found in each of the accounts. The longer the beneficiaries have been in office, the greater the account balances were found to be. They range from a few million USD to more than a billion USD in the case of John Roberts. The total number of slush fund accounts so far identified at the Vatican Bank is said to be between 600 and 700. This number is likely to grow as international élite corruption investigations spread worldwide. The disclosures have split the Roman Catholic Legatus organisation down the middle. Elizabeth Windsor (Queen Elizabeth II of England) is in the know and is intimately involved in the swirling and fissiparous covert power plays.”

    – Bob Chapman newsletter pg 9 Jan 15,2011
    http://seeker401.wordpress.com/2011/01/17/bob-chapman-newsletter-jan-152011-slush-fund-of-top-politicians-found-at-vatican-bank-obama-clinton-roberts-legatus-split/

  24. Iamacitizen2
    February 19th, 2013 @ 9:58 am

    yup it was by Kennedy but does he have to give a reason why or an explanation of his decision?

  25. GeorgiaKev
    February 19th, 2013 @ 9:58 am

    Application (12A606) denied by the Court. (02/19/2013).

  26. Francisco
    February 19th, 2013 @ 9:58 am

    There are 26 pages of Order for today, including our case 12A606. If all these cases were reviewed on February 15, it seems like an impossibility that these 9 old justices, could have concienciously reviewed case 12A606, that same date.
    If left to the clerks, to ascertain the legitimacy of the usurper, we are already lost.

  27. Francisco
    February 19th, 2013 @ 10:14 am

    Georgia

    Cases 578, 585 and 600 were denied, 606 is still pending. What you affirmed is incorrect !

  28. Francisco
    February 19th, 2013 @ 10:18 am

    Case 712 denied !! 606 Still pending a decision !!

  29. Jennifer Muehlheim
    February 19th, 2013 @ 10:30 am

    No. 12A606
    Title:
    Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants
    v.
    Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State
    Docketed: December 13, 2012
    Lower Ct: Supreme Court of California
    Case Nos.: (S207078)

    ~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Dec 11 2012 Application (12A606) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kennedy.
    Dec 13 2012 Application (12A606) denied by Justice Kennedy.
    Dec 26 2012 Application (12A606) refiled and submitted to The Chief Justice.
    Jan 9 2013 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 15, 2013.
    Jan 9 2013 Application (12A606) referred to the Court.
    Feb 19 2013 Application (12A606) denied by the Court.

    ~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~Phone~~~
    Attorneys for Petitioner:
    Orly Taitz 29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy (949) 683-5411
    Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
    Party name: Edward Noonan, et al.
    Attorneys for Respondent:
    Kamala Harris Attorney General (916) 445-9555
    P. O. Box 944255
    Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
    Party name: Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State

  30. Jay Orez
    February 19th, 2013 @ 10:32 am

    Does the attach link mean that the Feb. 15, 2013 conference is a “wash”?

    http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/12a606.htm

  31. Teresa
    February 19th, 2013 @ 10:33 am
  32. Jennifer Muehlheim
    February 19th, 2013 @ 10:34 am

    You can’t even get justice in America anymore. I guess if you are a criminal maybe you can.

  33. Robert
    February 19th, 2013 @ 10:48 am

    Case 712 Says”Applications” Denied, and 606 is right above it. It was Denied. Treasonous Basterds!

  34. Ill
    February 19th, 2013 @ 10:54 am
  35. liselou
    February 19th, 2013 @ 11:44 am

    Then I’m still praying that there are still an honest 4 judges that love the United States. Don’t they realize that if they allow this to go on, soon this administration will not need judges anymore and they will start disappearing also.

  36. Brent
    February 19th, 2013 @ 11:53 am
  37. Brent
    February 19th, 2013 @ 11:53 am
  38. Brent
    February 19th, 2013 @ 11:55 am
  39. Tom Arnold
    February 19th, 2013 @ 12:05 pm

    I called the “Supreme” Court. Case #12A-606, Noonan et al v Bowen, was DENIED WITHOUT REASON GIVEN, AND APPARENTLY WITHOUT THE “JUSTICES” EVER RECEIVING ALL OF ORLY’S PLEADINGS!
    In my view, the only way now to remove Obama from office is IMPEACHMENT or ARREST AND PROSECUTION.
    It’s obvious the courts don’t want to take up the Natural Born Citizen issue which obviously needs to be DEFINED, re: Obama, McCain, Rubio, etc.
    THE SUPREME COURT JUSTICES AND THE OPERATION OF THEIR COURT OUGHT TO BE INVESTIGATED BY CONGRESS. Then, IMPEACH THE SO-CALLED “JUSTICES” ALONG WITH OBAMA!

  40. Brian
    February 19th, 2013 @ 12:20 pm

    For those in denial: “Feb 19 2013 Application (12A606) denied by the Court.”

    http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/12a606.htm

    ————————————-
    Supreme Court Documents
    Supreme Court Information

    No. 12A606
    Title:
    Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants
    v.
    Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State
    Docketed: December 13, 2012
    Lower Ct: Supreme Court of California
    Case Nos.: (S207078)

    ~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Dec 11 2012 Application (12A606) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kennedy.
    Dec 13 2012 Application (12A606) denied by Justice Kennedy.
    Dec 26 2012 Application (12A606) refiled and submitted to The Chief Justice.
    Jan 9 2013 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 15, 2013.
    Jan 9 2013 Application (12A606) referred to the Court.
    Feb 19 2013 Application (12A606) denied by the Court.

    ~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~Phone~~~
    Attorneys for Petitioner:
    Orly Taitz 29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy (949) 683-5411
    Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
    Party name: Edward Noonan, et al.
    Attorneys for Respondent:
    Kamala Harris Attorney General (916) 445-9555
    P. O. Box 944255
    Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
    Party name: Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State

  41. Brian
    February 19th, 2013 @ 12:20 pm

    For those in denial: “Feb 19 2013 Application (12A606) denied by the Court.”

    http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/12a606.htm

    ————————————-
    Supreme Court Documents
    Supreme Court Information

    No. 12A606
    Title:
    Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants
    v.
    Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State
    Docketed: December 13, 2012
    Lower Ct: Supreme Court of California
    Case Nos.: (S207078)

    ~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Dec 11 2012 Application (12A606) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kennedy.
    Dec 13 2012 Application (12A606) denied by Justice Kennedy.
    Dec 26 2012 Application (12A606) refiled and submitted to The Chief Justice.
    Jan 9 2013 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 15, 2013.
    Jan 9 2013 Application (12A606) referred to the Court.
    Feb 19 2013 Application (12A606) denied by the Court.

    ~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~Phone~~~
    Attorneys for Petitioner:
    Orly Taitz 29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy (949) 683-5411
    Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
    Party name: Edward Noonan, et al.
    Attorneys for Respondent:
    Kamala Harris Attorney General (916) 445-9555
    P. O. Box 944255
    Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
    Party name: Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State

  42. Lewis Thomason
    February 19th, 2013 @ 12:28 pm

    Treason according to the Constitution:

    Section. 3.
    Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
    The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.

    Treason according to Orly Taitz:

    Anyone who disagrees with me is committing treason.

  43. Suzie
    February 19th, 2013 @ 12:56 pm

    Orly, it appears that our case has been denied, but as you are doing- keep following up. The justices did not even see the supplemental brief and I do not believe they saw any of it either., I think that the clerks just took it upon themselves to decide.

    My idea still stands especially now- think of those that hold Obama responsible- he does-
    This is not over- I do believe that God is watching and he will prevail soon. This appears to really be a case of good vs evil and I believe that good will prevail. Don’t give up- you are so close- you have come so far. We are behind you 125%

  44. JoAnn Barrick
    February 19th, 2013 @ 2:21 pm

    I saw a comment on here someplace where someone suggested Orly contact Donald Trump. I think that is a wonderful idea. I sent an email to him on his Facebook account and ask if he would help. I hope that is ok.
    He could at least bring more attention to the case so many people with their heads in the sand still have no clue all that Obama has gotten away with.

    I know I should have asked before I did that and I am sorry if that was a wrong thing to do.
    Someone please let me know!

  45. Chief_Cabioch
    February 19th, 2013 @ 2:48 pm

    No one can find anywhere in the US Constitution these judges are appointed for Life, they are appointed for Periods of good behavior ONLY, nothing more nothing less, “Article III” section 1

    The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behavior, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services a Compensation which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.

  46. Francisco
    February 19th, 2013 @ 2:52 pm

    Of all the case Orders before SCOTUS, and dealing with the 12A prefix, the only one that has not been denied as of this moment is 12A606.
    Orly, is that a good sign, when the jury stay that long in deliveration ?

  47. Francisco
    February 19th, 2013 @ 3:16 pm

    If Trump was ready to give Obama 5 million dollars for his papers, giving one million to defray the cost of this unequal battle, should not sent the Don to the poor house.

  48. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    February 19th, 2013 @ 5:08 pm

    Trump is full of empty talk

  49. taino21
    February 19th, 2013 @ 5:41 pm

    No decision yet! From SCOTUS web site: file type icon Docket for 12A606
    Title: Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State
    Application (12A606) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kennedy. Application (12A606) denied by Justice Kennedy. Application (12A606) refiled and submitted to The Chief Justice.

  50. Francisco
    February 19th, 2013 @ 5:58 pm

    Of all the case Orders before SCOTUS, and dealing with the 12A prefix, the only one that has not been denied as of this moment is 12A606.
    If I were the Impostor, I would be taking three Xanax before going to bed tonight !!

  51. Javier
    February 20th, 2013 @ 12:35 am

    It appears that the SCOTUS clerks may be up to their normal tricks of concealing what really happened during Tuesdays orders. At 9:50am (Tuesday;2/19/2013) a live scotusblog.com entry by Lyle Denniston stated — ‘In answer to a question, the Court denied a stay in the case of Noonan v. Bowen (12A606), but did not act on any other aspect of that case.’ — Several hours later the Supremecourt.gov docket showed ‘Application (12A606) denied by the court. It appears the docket ‘denied’ entry was intentionally entered in error or meant to be misleading, and that it is likely that more orders will come for case 12A606 on 2/10/2013. My bet is that we will have good news in this application. Truth can only be concealed for so long, and the momentum is surely running against this corrupt foreigner and his organization that has usurped the office of POTUS and occupied the people’s White House.

  52. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    February 20th, 2013 @ 12:42 am

    please, send me this entry in the scotusblog

  53. Francisco
    February 20th, 2013 @ 6:28 am

    If the power of the SCOTUS’ Clerks have reach such a point, as to being able to restrict the briefs, flow of information, and appeals that reaches the justices of the Supreme Court, I would venture to say that if that is the case, an investigation by Congress ought to be done in an expedicious manner, in order to clean up the corruption that is jeopardizing the constitutional processes of our republic.

  54. Francisco
    February 20th, 2013 @ 9:57 am

    Out ff the dozens of Orders denying Certiorari, one of the few cases still pending for an Order, and representing less than 5 % of the total cases, is case 12A606.
    I think that this might indicate a certain conflict that might be occurring within the justices.

  55. Davey Crockett
    February 20th, 2013 @ 5:51 pm

    Orly: is the poster Chief_Cabioch correct when he posts that (no one can find anything in the Constitution that says that the SC Justices are appointed for life?)!!

  56. Louis Cipher
    February 20th, 2013 @ 6:26 pm

    Do tell us more of your opinions on the workings of the Supreme Court, Francisco.

  57. BO PE
    February 21st, 2013 @ 4:44 pm

    Can you show us Francisco where this is on the website and how to get to the information you are talking about?

    Everytime I go to the link I see denied.

    Is there another link we should be looking at to show a better status of the case particulars at hand?

    Most of us are not lawyers…

    Better late than never obama…

  58. Francisco
    February 21st, 2013 @ 5:54 pm

    BO PE
    Go to web, in ‘For Search Term’, type Order 2/19/2013 , hit ‘Search’. At top hit on the first line where 2/19/2013 appears.
    A calendar mark in different colors would appear. Hit on red 19, for February 19. Go to left side where Orders appear. Hit on that, and a list of orders would appear. Go to 2/19/2013 under Order List, hit on it, and the list would contain the case 12A606, without any decision as of this moment.

  59. Francisco
    February 22nd, 2013 @ 10:30 am

    Orly
    As an attorney, what is your opinion as to the fact that after four days of the SCOTUS being deliverating about case 12A606, they still have not denied your petion for Certiorari?

  60. Bruriah Sarah
    February 22nd, 2013 @ 12:30 pm

    Dr. Taitz:

    I just checked the Supreme Court website and found that the case was denied:

    http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/12a606.htm

    but if you look down – the order refers to Kennedy – not Roberts. And since justice Roberts was the one who agreed to hear the case, then the denial by Kennedy doesn’t make sense.

    Something is wrong here.

  61. Birdy
    February 23rd, 2013 @ 2:05 pm

    (ORDER LIST: 568 U.S.)
    TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 19, 2013
    ORDERS IN PENDING CASES
    12A568
    GERMALIC, JAMES R. V. NY BD. OF ELECTIONS COMM’RS
    (12-42)
    The application for leave to file a petition for rehearing
    in excess of word limits addressed to Justice Alito and referred
    to the Court is denied.
    12A578
    JIAU, WINIFRED V. UNITED STATES
    The application for bail addressed to Justice Sotomayor and
    referred to the Court is denied.
    12A585
    PAVLOCK, MICHAEL J. V. UNITED STATES
    The application for a stay addressed to Justice Sotomayor
    and referred to the Court is denied.
    12A600
    HEDGES, CHRISTOPHER, ET AL. V. OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF U.S., ET AL.
    The application to vacate stay addressed to Justice Scalia
    and referred to the Court is denied.
    12A606
    NOONAN, EDWARD, ET AL. V. BOWEN, CA SEC. OF STATE
    12A712
    KWASNIK, MAREK A. V. FNMA
    The applications for stay addressed to The Chief Justice and
    referred to the Court are denied.
    12M80
    SANTAMARIA, MACARIO V. KNOWLIN, WARDEN
    12M81
    HARDIN, MICHELE G. V. MONROE COUNTY, FL, ET AL.
    12M82
    CHEVALIER, REYNAULT V. NEW YORK, ET AL.
    12M83
    GLENN, ENDRE V. KANE, DONNA, ET AL.
    12M84
    LAROCHE, MARIE B. V. FISHER, JEFFREY B., ET AL.
    12M85
    FRENGLER, NEIL J. V. GENERAL MOTORS, ET AL.
    1

    This information from http://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/021913zor_19m1.pdf shows that 12A606 Noonan v Bowen is still active.

  62. Francisco
    February 24th, 2013 @ 6:09 pm

    Louis
    I cannot tell you about the inner workings of the Supreme Court, no more than you could, but it is curious that a week after the Conference in which case 12A606 was reviewed, almost 95 % of the requests for Certiorari have been denied, and Obama’s case is still under review.
    What do you make of it ?

Leave a Reply