Very important! March on DC against Amnesty, for jobs for 22 million Americans, against corrupt members of Congress, who are on the take to steal jobs and benefits from Americans
Posted on | June 18, 2013 | No Comments
| Stephen Huffman |
Submitted on 2013/06/18 at 3:16 pm
I found this today, for anyone interested. Another big rally next month in D.C., this one over immigration March on DC against Amnesty. Free round trip bus rides from anywhere in the continental US provided the bus is filled with 40 patriots ! Join a bus here..https://www.facebook.com/pages/DC-March-For-Jobs-Join-A-Bus/383712311734554 Transportation coordination for the DC March for Jobs! Buses with 40 or more people on them are FREE. Coordinate with us and those in your localities to order buses to the march in Washington DC on July 15th at 9:30am. Description |
J. Christian Adams agrees with me, AZ case actually helps us, as the states can demand proof of citizenship on state forms, not federal forms. That is exactly, what I wrote yesterday. This actually strengthens my Ca cases, where 2 registrars were caught falsifying state forms and Obama regime claimed those forms to be irrelevant.
Posted on | June 18, 2013 | 4 Comments
Left Loses Big in Citizenship-Verification Supreme Court Case
Something perverse happened after the Supreme Court’s decision today invalidating citizenship-verification requirements in Arizona for registrants who use the federal voter registration form. The Left knows they lost most of the battle, but are still claiming victory. That’s what they do. Election-integrity proponents and the states are saying they lost, but don’t realize they really won.
The Left wins even when they lose, and conservatives are often bewildered and outfoxed in the election-process game.
Earlier today, I called the decision a nothingburger. After re-reading the case and reflecting a bit more, it’s clear that the decision was a disaster for the Left and their victory cackles are hollow — and they know it.
Worse, conservatives dooms-dayers who have never litigated a single National Voter Registration Act case have taken to the airwaves, describing the case as a disaster which invites illegal-alien voting.
In the last year, I’ve litigated five NVRA cases and worked on the preemption issues for years, and there is more to cheer in today’s opinion than there is to bemoan. Those complaining about the opinion don’t understand what the Left’s goal was in this case: total federal preemption. On that score, Justice Scalia foiled them; indeed, the decision today was a huge war won, even if the small Arizona battle was lost.
From my time in the Justice Department Voting Section, I can remember intimately the wars over some of the preemption issues decided today.
The Left essentially believes that anyone who fills out a federal Election Assistance Commission registration form should be allowed on the rolls, no questions asked. There were complex fights over the “citizen check-off box” issues, with the Left wanting the box rendered meaningless, and conservatives and election-integrity proponents believing a registration cannot be processed until a registrant affirms on the box that he or she is a citizen.
Before the decision today, here is what the Left wanted:
● Invalidation of Arizona’s requirement that those submitting a federal form provide proof of citizenship with their federal form. Mind you, the citizenship-proof requirement is NOT part of federal law and the Election Assistance Commission does NOT require it in the form they drafted.
● Invalidation of state citizenship-verification requirements when a state voter registration form is used (yes, such forms exist separate from the federal requirement) on the basis of federal preemption. They wanted the Arizona case to invalidate all state citizenship-verification requirements.
● Automatic registration if a registrant submits a completed federal EAC approved registration form, no questions asked.
● Federal preemption on the ability for states to have customized federal EAC-approved forms that differed from the default EAC form.
● Federal preemption over states, like Florida and Kansas, looking for independent information on citizenship to root out noncitizens from the voter rolls. Again, the Left wanted the federal EAC form to be the no-questions-asked ticket to the voter rolls.
So what is the score on these five goals after Justice Scalia’s opinion today? Election-integrity advocates are batting .800; left wing groups, .200. And the most insignificant issue of the five is the one issue the Left won. Justice Scalia foiled 4 of 5 of their goals, and the 4 biggest ones.
How does it work? The decision today uncorks state power. The Left wanted state power stripped and they lost.
First, Arizona can simply push the state forms in all state offices and online, and keep those federal forms in the back room gathering dust. When you submit a state form, you have to prove citizenship. Thanks to Justice Scalia, that option is perfectly acceptable. Loss for the Left. Victory for election integrity.
You might say, “That’s a small victory.” Nonsense. This was the whole ballgame to the groups pushing the Arizona lawsuit. They lost, period.
Next, when voters use a state, as opposed to a federal, form, they can still be required to prove citizenship. The federal form is irrelevant in that circumstance.
After the decision today, states have a green light to do double- and triple-checking even if a registrant uses the federal form. The Left wanted the submission of a federal form to mean automatic no-questions-asked registration. This is a big loss for the Left because now states can put suspect forms in limbo while they run checks against non-citizen databases and jury-response forms. Another significant victory in today’s decision. The Left wanted to strip them of that double-checking power.
The decision today is a great example of how conservatives can be distracted by squirrels running past. It is understandable and forgivable because they aren’t daily immersed in the long-term election-process agenda of the left-wing groups. Nor do they daily involve themselves with the details of election process. But having been in the “preemption wars” for nearly a decade, I can assure you this case is a big win, even if it doesn’t appear so at first glance.
How do you go around the latest assault on our rights by the Supreme Court? Here is my idea. Demand a proof of National and state citizenship to be a registered voter. State that this is done for the purpose of conducting state elections. Option 2-secede from the US. I believe TX and AZ might start the secession and other states might join them in forming a new union, which is not controlled by the AntiAmerican Bilderberg-Davos Racketeering influenced criminal enterprise.
Posted on | June 17, 2013 | 27 Comments
Supreme Court strikes down Arizona voter registration law...
Proof-of-Citizenship Voided...
Scalia Rules With Majority...
for Snowden the lies of the gang of 8 (8 most corrupt U.S. Senators pushing to legalize 40 million illegals) was the straw that broke the camel’s back. Each senator and corngressman voting for this mega amnesty is a traitor, has to be tried for treason, not Snowden who is risking his life by exposing the criminal syndicate of the U.S. government working hand in hand with a number of largest high tech companies
Posted on | June 17, 2013 | 11 Comments
The Blog
Snowden: ‘Lies’ from Gang of 8 ‘Compelled Me to Act’
Send to KindleEdward Snowden says “lies” from the Gang of 8 are part of the reason he felt “compelled … to act.” He made the statement in response to a question about his motivations in releasing classified information on the Guardian‘s website.
“I imagine everyone’s experience is different, but for me, there was no single moment. It was seeing a continuing litany of lies from senior officials to Congress – and therefore the American people – and the realization that that Congress, specifically the Gang of Eight, wholly supported the lies that compelled me to act. Seeing someone in the position of James Clapper – the Director of National Intelligence – baldly lying to the public without repercussion is the evidence of a subverted democracy. The consent of the governed is not consent if it is not informed,” Snowden writes.
It is not clear if Snowden is referring here to the Gang of 8 tackling immigration reform, or some other Gang of 8.
Here’s the question Snowden is answering, “My question: given the enormity of what you are facing now in terms of repercussions, can you describe the exact moment when you knew you absolutely were going to do this, no matter the fallout, and what it now feels like to be living in a post-revelation world? Or was it a series of moments that culminated in action? I think it might help other people contemplating becoming whistleblowers if they knew what the ah-ha moment was like. Again, thanks for your courage and heroism.”
That question is presented by someone with the nam
Moron Barbara Sterisand needs to have her head examined
Posted on | June 17, 2013 | 4 Comments
Moron Barbara Sterisand needs to have her head examined. She protests treatment of women in Israel, where women already held positions of Prime Minister (twice), speaker of the parliament(Kneset) and Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and where level of education and financial equality for women is the highest in the world. At the same time Streisand does not speak up about treatment of women in Muslim countries, where women are lashed and stoned to death, covered behind the veil and routinely denied voting rights, education and care.
Streisand is one of these self hating Jews who needs her head examined
Streisand slams treatment of women -- in Israel!
Morons of the Republican party are joining anti-American treasonous Democrats to give citizenship to some 40 million illegals and take away jobs and benefits from millions of American citizens. Thank you, anti-American traitors, corrupt politicians and idiots
Posted on | June 17, 2013 | 4 Comments
Bachmann Tells Mark Levin: If Amnesty Passes ‘No Republican Will Ever Get Elected President Again’ (Audio)
Posted by Jim Hoft on Monday, June 17, 2013, 7:42 AM
Michele Bachmann warned Mark Levin last week, If amnesty passes,
“No Republican will ever get elected president again.”
Via The Daily Rushbo:
VIDEO
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
YouTube – Videos from this emailPress release: Federal Judge Andrew Guilford finds in favor of Attorney Taitz, finds that she never lied, she did not lie to the court and there is nor reason to sanction her. At the same time he gives a leave of court (allows) Attorney Taitz to file a motion against Attorney Berg and his paralegal Lisa Liberi for lying
Posted on | June 17, 2013 | 9 Comments
Press release: Federal Judge Andrew Guilford finds in favor of Attorney Taitz, finds that she never lied, that she did not lie to the court and there is nor reason to sanction her. At the same time he gives a leave of court (allows) Attorney Taitz to file a motion against Attorney Berg and his paralegal Lisa Liberi for lying.
Many in left wing media were reporting that Attorney Orly Taitz is about to be sanctioned by the Federal Judge because of allegation made by Attorney Philip Berg.
Today at a motion hearing before Federal Judge Andrew Guilford, Judge Guilford ruled in favor of Taitz and found that she did not lie and there is no basis to sanction her for anything.
Taitz demands that Huffington Post, OC Weekly (Orange CountyWeekly), multiple Patch community papers and others, who published such defamatory statements, claiming that she is about to be sanctioned for lying, to file this press release, advising the public that the judge found that she did not lie and there is no reason or justification for sanctioning her.
Further, Taitz has been harassed for four year by a bogus law suit brought by Pennsylvania attorney Philip Berg, who was already ruled to be suspended from practice. Berg is currently awaiting a ruling by the Supreme Court of PA on his appeal of his suspension from practice of law. The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of PA ruled to suspend his license for over a year when he admitted to lying to the client and to the disciplinary board, whereby for over a year he did not advise his client that her case was dismissed, he was telling the client that the case was still going on. Berg also submitted to the Disciplinary Board a sworn declaration of Lisa Liberi, claimed that she advised the client, while later Berg admitted that the client was never advised, that it was a lie.
Additionally, Liberi was tried in CA in 2008 in a different case, there were 24 felony counts of forgery and grand theft against her. She was convicted on 10 counts of forgery of an official seal, grand theft and attempt to file forged/altered documents. She received 8 years prison term, which was later reduced to 3 years of probation due to medical reasons.
In the current case Berg claimed that he and his legal assistant Lisa Liberi were defamed by publishing of Liberi’s criminal record, trying to imply that she was a different person. Liberi already admitted that she is indeed a convicted felon from California. The court already dismissed the case against multiple other parties, citing her criminal record, and everything published about her was public information, and Liberi herself entered all her personal information including her full unredacted Social Security number into public record in her criminal case and in her two bankrupcy cases.
After years of litigation when defendants sought to dismiss the original complaint, Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. Defendants sought to strike the complaint under antiSLAPP, which would have given the defendants all their attorneys fees, which was not granted, however the court gave them a leave of court to file motions to dismiss the amended complaint by Berg, Liberi and others for failure to state a claim (meaning no basis) and under lack of jurisdiction, which was not ruled upon on the merits for four years yet. This new motions to dismiss the frivolous complaint by Berg and Liberi will be filed within 30 days.
Since the 1960s civil rights movement, different bogus legal actions were used to harass civil rights leaders, to drain their financial and emotional resources. Taitz believes that what is being done to her, is being done for the same reasons, but to a much higher degree.
Thank God! Press release: Judge Lamberth, Chief Judge of the USDC for the District of Columbia gives leave of court to file 74 pages of motions and documents providing undeniable evidence of Obama’s use of a stolen Social Security number and seeking release of the original application for the aforementioned number
Posted on | June 14, 2013 | 106 Comments
Press release
Law Offices of Orly Taitz
On 06.13.2013 Judge Lamberth Chief Judge for the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia gave leave of court to file 74 pages of motions and exhibits submitted by Attorney Orly Taitz in case 11-cv-402 Taitz v Astrue (Michael Astrue was the Commissioner of the Social Security at the time the case was originally filed, currently it is Carolyn W.Colvin)
This is significant, as the motions attached herein show that Barack Obama is using a stolen Social Security number of Harrison J. Bounel, born in 1890, immigrant from Russia, who is presumed to be deceased.
At the time the case was originally filed and heard, the plaintiffs did not have new information that became available recently. Such information includes recently released census data which shows Harrison J. Bounel being born in 1890, recent disclosure to the public of the 120 year SSA rule, which requires release of SS-5, Social Security original application of “extremely aged individuals”, meaning individuals of 120 years old or older without a consent of such individual and without a death certificate or any other proof of death, as well as recent report from Merlins Information Systems showing Barack Obama using both Bounel’s name and Social Security number in connection to his property at 5046 Greenwood in Chicago as late as 2009.
All of this information placed Obama in the corner and with no way out. (not counting his planned trip to Africa, of course). Holder Department of Justice has until 06.27.2013 to file an opposition on behalf of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, however at this time Social Security Administration cannot provide any justification or opposition. Holder , Obama and Carolyn W. Colvin, new Commissioner of SSA have to produce the application, which was filed by Harrison J. Bounel and which would be sufficient evidence not only for an impeachment of Obama, but also for criminal prosecution of Obama.
See below:
1. a note from Judge Lamberth stating “Let this motion and attached motions and documents be filed, USDJ (U.S. District Judge) Royce C. Lamberth 06.13.2013″
2. filed redacted motions and exhibits
3. unredacted motions and exhibits, as a reference, which allow the public to see Obama using Bounel’s Social Security number
Attorney Taitz thanks the public for all the support. Attorney Orly Taitz will be demonstrating in front of the U.S. Capitol together with Tea Party Patriots on 06. 19.2013, 12 noon. Taitz is asking her supporters to join her and oppose new immigration bill, which is nothing but Mega Amnesty, which robs Americans of their jobs and benefits and dumps the cost of trillions of dollars of benefits for those illegals on the shoulders of overburdened middle class. Corrupt members of Congress completely abandoned 90 million Americans who are out of workforce, who stopped looking for jobs, 14 million of Americans on unemployment, 11 million on bogus disability because they cannot find jobs and 9 million who work part time with no benefits because they cannot find full time jobs. US Congress and Federal government have no Constitutional mandate to facilitate an invasion of estimated 42 million of illegals residing in the U.S. today, which will swell to 100 million new immigrants within 10 years, particularly in the time of enormous unemployment. This is not done to help the illegals, this is done to supply more cheap and obedient labor for ruling oligarchy, ruling gang of 100-200 families of billionaires who keep in their little back pocket both the Criminal with stolen forged IDs in the WH and most of the Congress. Most egregious violation on part of Congress, is unwillingness to hold hearings and impeachment of Obama based on his use of forged and stolen IDs. How can U.S. Congress tell U.S. citizens that they should support this new mega amnesty, that the government will check E-Verify of millions of illegals, when members of the U.S. Congress have in front of them Obama’s failed E-Verify and they do nothing, do not hold any hearings on this issue.
After the protest in front of the Capitol, we will continue with the protest in front of the offices of the most corrupt Senators and Congressmen from both parties, who are refusing to address Obama’s failed E-Verify and and who push for Amnesty and promise to check the E-Verify of millions of illegals : John Boehner (OH), Nancy Pelosi (CA), Harry Reid(NV), John McCain(AZ), Chuck Schumer(NY), Marco Rubio(FL), Dick Durbin(IL), Paul Ryan(WI), Robert Menendez(NJ), Lindsey Graham(SC), Michael Bennett (CO), Jeff Flake (AZ), Kelly Ayotte(NH) and others time permitting. If citizens do not stand up for their rights and justice, U.S. will turn into a one party dictatorial regime similar to Jihadist Iran, Communist Soviet Union or NAZI Germany.
Donations from the public to support pro bono legal work and advocacy of Attorney Taitz are greatly appreciated. Paypal link and address are posted on the website OrlyTaitzESQ.com
Draft of the FOIA request to the Department of Justice
Posted on | June 13, 2013 | 9 Comments
DEFEND OUR FREEDOMS FOUNDATION
DR. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ
29839 SANTA MARGARITA, STE 100
RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA, CA 92688
PH 949-683-5411 FAX 949-766-7603
Attention
FOIA/PA Mail Referral Unit
Department of Justice
Room 115
LOC Building
Washington, DC 20530-0001
(301) 583-7354
(301) 341-0772 fax
06.13.2013
1. Petitioner Attorney Orly Taitz requests under freedom of information act 5 U.S.C. 552 any and all documents, showing how did the U.S. Attorneys’ office/Department of Justice obtain bank account information of civil rights attorney Orly Taitz.
Attorney Orly Taitz(Hereinafter Taitz) is a Civil Rights Attorney, and she represented pro bono a number of plaintiffs, among them members of the U.S. military seeking production of the original IDs of Barack Obama in light of the fact that sworn affidavits of licensed investigators showed his IDs to be flagrant forgeries and Social Security used by him to be fraudulently obtained. One of such cases was Rhodes v MacDonald 4:09-CV-106 Middle District of GA.
Federal Judge Clay D. Land attempted to intimidate Attorney Taitz and send a message to other attorneys not to question Obama’s forgeries by assessing sanctions against Taitz.
Without any evidentiary hearing and any motion to produce bank information, US Attorneys’ office/Department of Justice contacted two banks where Taitz banked and advised them that she owes money to USA and the accounts can be liened. As a result Taitz was embarrassed in front of employees of two banks, where she banked. Her credit rating went down immediately and her credit line was cut by about 70% immediately. At the same time the Department of Justice advised Taitz that if she does not pay $20,000 immediately, Department of Justice will place a lien on her house and will sell her house to cover the lien.
Under FOIA 5 USC 552 Taitz demands any and all documents showing where did the Department of Justice/U.S. Attorneys’ office obtain her bank account information.
2. In May of 2009 Attorney Taitz filed a Quo Warranto requests with the Attorney General Eric Holder (see attached). For a period of four years she did not receive any response. Taitz is seeking any and all documentation generated in response to her Quo Warranto request.
3. In the beginning of 2011 Attorney Taitz reported to the US Attorneys’ office that Court Reporter for the Eastern District of PA, US District Court and for the Eastern District of PA and Third Circuit Court of Appeals that Court Reporter for the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of PA, Dona Anders, falsified an official court transcript and removed 14 pages out of a certified court transcript of a motion hearing held on 12.20.2010 before Judge Eduardo Robreno. Anders removed the whole cross examination of a party done by Attorney Taitz. When Anders was confronted by Taitz with a demand for explanation, she tried to claim that pages were missing due to scanner problems. The explanation was not valid, as with scanner problems one would see one or two pages missing and would see a word or a sentence being cut, incomplete at the end of the page. In the case of the falsification of the transcript by Anders, she has done it intentionally, as she neatly arranged the examination of the next witness in the middle of the page right after the direct examination of the prior witness, as if cross examination was never done. Such forgery/falsification of the court transcript benefitted an opposing attorney Berg, as in the cross examination a party to the action admitted that the allegations made in the case, were not made by her but were made up in the law office of Attorney Berg.
Taitz did not receive any response since the beginning of 2011, for two and a half years. If Anders could falsify the transcript in Taitz case, she could do it in other cases and cause immeasurable damage to numerous innocent individuals.
Taitz hereby requests any and all documentation showing any and all actions taken in response to her complaint.
Specifically, Taitz is seeking information, whether
a. Anders is still employed as a court reporter in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
b. Any and all documentation of an investigation of the matter and any and all discipline
c. Any and all documentation showing, whether the matter was forwarded to the criminal department for criminal prosecution
d. Any and all information, whether Ander was ordered or told by any high ranking official to falsify the official court transcript
e. Any and all information, whether Anders received any incentive, any compensation for falsification of the official court transcript.
4. In December 2013 U.S. Attorneys’ office made an appearance in case Grinols et al v Electoral college, U.S. Congress et al 12-cv-02997 US District Court for the Eastern District of California and stated to the presiding judge Hon Morrison C. England that the U.S. Attorneys’ Office /Department of Justice represents the U.S. Congress and seeks to oppose the emergency injunction and seeks to dismiss the case. The main portion of the case dealt with evidence of Barack Obama used a stolen/fraudulently obtained CT Social Security number 042-68-4425 of Harrison J. Bounel, born in 1890 and presumed to be deceased and used forged birth certificate and Selective Service certificate as a basis of his identity and eligibility to the U.S. Presidency. Plaintiffs sought injunctive and declaratory relief
Later in March of 2013 Attorney Taitz, who represented the Plaintiffs travelled to Washington DC and attended the CPAC convention, where multiple members of the U.S. Congress advised her that the Department of Justice did not notify them that they are being represented in this case, did not forward to them any pleadings and documentation and it appears that the Department of Justice went behind the back of the members of the U.S. Congress and defrauded them and defrauded the court by seeking to dismiss the case on behalf of the U.S. Congress.
Petitioner Taitz is seeking under FOIA 5USC 552 any and all documentation showing that U.S. Attorneys for the Eastern District of California, Benjamin Wagner and Ed Olsen or Attorney General Holder or any other employee of the Department of Justice advised members of the U.S. Congress about the representation in this case and forwarded to the members of the U.S. Congress the pleadings and documents submitted in this case on their behalf.
Petitioner Taitz is requesting a response within a customary 20 day period for FOIA return
/s/ Orly Taitz, ESQ
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
No Response yet from the Inspector General of the office of Postmaster General on the fabricated postal stamp in Obama’ Selective Service Certificate
Posted on | June 13, 2013 | 3 Comments
A proposal by Orly Taitz, how to make sure people are not voting illegally
Posted on | June 18, 2013 | 2 Comments
Yesterday U.S. Supreme Court voted that one cannot demand proof of citizenship added to the voter registration form. Democrats are claiming that the states cannot use the state voter registration forms, they have to use federal forms.
Here is an idea: Federal courts protect themselves by demanding to check the IDs, to check the drivers licenses just to enter the court house. In my case Keyes v Obama the secret service was actually writing down the names of individuals who came to the hearing with the only purpose of intimidating dissidents who were demanding adjudication on the merits of their complaints dealing with Obama’s use of all forged and stolen IDs .
Well, it is time to turn the tables. The states can regulate in which way do they want to hold elections. It is time for the states to end the mail in vote aside from active military and people who are bed ridden. The rest will have to vote in person and to assure security of the elections, they will have to show their IDs to enter the building, just as it is done in courts. One’s that do not have valid IDs, cannot enter and cannot vote. All voting has to be done with paper ballots and the votes have to be counted in the precincts.
While Usurper in Chief and Mrs. Moochele Usurper are spending 5 mil on a trip to Ireland and are scheduled to spend 100 mil in Africa, American children are still prevented from visiting the WH
Posted on | June 18, 2013 | No Comments
Michelle Obama’s Ireland Visit Costs $5 Million
7 most corrupt GOP members of the Senate who voted against the border security amendments
Posted on | June 18, 2013 | 2 Comments
these 7 most corrupt Republican senators joined the Democrat-party of treason in voting against border fence, against border security and for the massive amnesty of illegals:
4 corrupt Republicans in the gang of 8: John McCain(AR), Jeff Flake(AR), Marco Rubio(FL) and Lindsey Graham(SC) as well as Lisa Murkowski(AK), Kelly Ayote (NH) and Susan Collins of ME
Tea party Nation is calling to primary all of them in the next election, meaning throwing them out of office by voting for their opponents in the primary. Please, burn the lines of their phones and demand they vote “NO” on amnesty. They are committing treason.
On the other hand my new congressman (after the redistricting) Dana Rohrbacher is threatening a call of no-confidence against John Boehner if he pushes for amnesty.
I am wondering, what was given or promised to these 7 corrupt senators, as well as Boehner and Paul Ryan, to persuade them to vote no on border security and yes on mega amnesty, which robs Americans of their jobs and benefits.
A note for Obama operatives that are writing to me
Posted on | June 18, 2013 | No Comments
Obama operatives are writing to me.
They are asking: what right did you lose?
1. in relation to illegals voting, it means that my vote and votes of millions of legal U.s. citizens will be neutralized by illegals voting
2. in relation to usurper Obama, we will be deprived of lawful elections
Rasmussen: 7 out of 10 Americans believe that Obama regime is lying, that IRS targeting came from DC, not the result of actions of a couple of rogue agents in Cincinnati
Posted on | June 18, 2013 | No Comments
 |
|
|
|||
| While the controversy over the National Security Agency surveillance program has dominated the news recently, concern about the Internal Revenue Service’s targeting of Tea Party groups and other conservative organizations remains high and is inching up. Despite the large number of controversies engulfing official Washington, the number of people following the IRS scandal has actually increased in recent weeks. Read More |
|
 |
|
|
|||
| It’s the time in the political cycle when just about any Republican could be considered a presidential candidate. New Jersey Governor Chris Christie’s name comes up often in those discussions, but New Jersey voters aren’t convinced he should make the run. Read More |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted on | June 18, 2013 | No Comments
Yesterday Supreme Court stated that AZ cannot add a question of citizenship to the federal forms.
First, I already explained that the states can chose state forms and still demand proof of citizenship.
second, Ted Cruz, is the only senator who is seeking to defend the Constitution, at least to the most minimum degree, as he stated that he will add an amendment to the amnesty bill before the Senate now, which will require proof of citizenship for voter registration.
Please, keep calling his office and demand that he speak up on the issue of Obama’s use of a stolen Social Security number and his failed E-Verify
Could current protests undermine the Workers party of Brazil, it’s leader Dilma Rousseff, who is of Bulgarian-communist upbringing and the rising star, Mayor of San Paolo Fernando Haddad, who is Syrian-Lebanese???
Posted on | June 18, 2013 | No Comments
Posted on | June 18, 2013 | No Comments
| EqualjusticeI 113 approved |
Submitted on 2013/06/18 at 2:39 am
Patrick Duffy you are right on. |
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
Dr. Orly Taitz, Esquire-
Official website for Orly Taitz for U.S. Senate 2012
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Other Sites
Advertisement / Sponsors
Vote Dr. Orly Taitz for U.S. Senate 2012 in CA
--------------------------------------
Please make a donation to Dr. Orly Taitz for CA U.S. Senate 2012 Campaign
--------------------------------------
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
----------------------------------------
The People's Senator.
She fights for America!Share
Alan Keyes - Loyal to Liberty
FedUpUSA.Net
Post & Email
Rick Baker Show
The People's Senator. 
