OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi



Same attorney, Daniel Hu, represents the defendant in Taitz v Johnson and in Texas v USA

Posted on | December 19, 2014 | 1 Comment

12/19/2014 30 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel David Hu on behalf of United States of America, Ronald D. Vitiello, Thomas S. Winkowski, filed. (Hu, Daniel) (Entered: 12/19/2014)

Trump Christmas Card ‘Fires’ Obama

Posted on | December 19, 2014 | 6 Comments

Trump Christmas Card ‘Fires’ Obama

1,050,000 articles on Google under Orly Taitz at 4:08 am. Watch 75% of these links being scrubbed within 1 hour, Obama regime hard at work

Posted on | December 19, 2014 | 5 Comments

Google Orly Taitz

About 1,050,000 results (0.60 seconds)

Civil rights leader and veteran, Neil Turner, meets with Congr. Issa to see how was Issa threatened, what caused him to be complicit in the cover up of Obama’s use of a stolen SSN 042-68-4425 and fabricated IDs. Please, schedule meetings with your congressmen, demand answers from them

Posted on | December 18, 2014 | 7 Comments

I am attending a scheduled Citizen Lobby visit with Congressman Darrell Issa’s staff at 9:30 am PST on Friday, December 19, 2014, in Vista, CA.

 

I will be presenting a Letter to Mr. Issa that will be included in an ‘information packet’ for him. (I will also be mailing it to each of his offices, to make sure that all of staff are aware of our concerns – and Mr. Issa’s continuing support of the treason that is Obama.

 

I would appreciate hearing your comments, concerns, objections and recommendations before presenting this letter to him.

 

Regards,

 

Neil Turner

 

19 December 2014

 

Congressman Darrell Issa
Vista District Office                               Washington DC Office                           Dana Point District Office
1800 Thibodo Road, #310                   2347 Rayburn House Office Bldg.         33282 Golden Lantern, #102
Vista, CA 92081                                    Washington, DC 20515                                    Dana Point, CA 92629

 

Congressman Issa;

 

In 2003, you were a co-sponsor of H.J.R. 59, a Constitutional Amendment to remove the requirement that one must be a natural born Citizen to be eligible for the Office of President, one of no less than 8 unsuccessful Congressional attempts to remove that requirement before Obama/Soetoro ran for the Office.

 

Therefore, we can only conclude, beyond any reasonable doubt, that both you and all of Congress are fully aware that Obama/Soetoro DOES NOT MEET THAT REQUIREMENT, that he is a USURPER committing Treason against the United States, …

… and yet you, in violation of both your military officer’s oath and your Congressional oath of office for the last 13 years, refuse to support and defend the Constitution against this act of usurpation and treason.

 

We The People (your ‘employers’) know that you (our ‘public servant’) know that Obama/Soetoro uses forged and counterfeited ID’s (Certificate of Birth and Selective Service Registration) and a self-published stolen SS# 042-68-4425 that fails E-Verify for employment in the United States, never mind the national security sensitive Office of POTUS – for ‘proof’ of eligibility for the Office of POTUS.

 

Therefore, your continuing willingness to pay homage and give legitimacy to this undocumented Muslim usurper makes you, along with all of Congress and the Judiciary, complicit in thses acts of treason against these United States.

 

My question to you, ‘Honorable’ Congressman Darrell Issa, is: Why do you continue to pretend that you represent us, We The People, and your military Officer and Congressional oaths to support and defend the Constitution, when your acts (voting for the HR 83 Appropriations Act; voting to ‘approve-without-objection’ electoral votes for the usurper – twice) and your failures to act (not calling for impeachment of the obvious usurper; not calling for indictments against Obama & Hillary Clinton for ‘gun-running to our enemies’ at Benghazi)?

 

Is it because:

  1. a) You have been threatened with the loss of your life?, or
  2. b) You have been threatened with the loss of your loved ones’ lives?, or
  3. c) Something else?

 

Your personal response of A, B, or C is required, so that I and my compatriots can decide now how to proceed in our efforts to support and defend the Constitution which you and your Congressional compatriots have so ignominiously ignored.

 

In Liberty and In Truth.

 

/s/ Neil B. Turner

Draft of a reply to Obama’s opposition in Taitz v Jeh Johnson, Sylvia Burwell, Barack Obama to stop Obama- amnesty. In the other news federal judge denied Arpaio’s request to testify in regards to Obama’s amnesty

Posted on | December 18, 2014 | 2 Comments

nesty, taxpayer stan

  1. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ

29839 SANTA MARGARITA, STE 100

RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA, CA 92688

PH 949-683-5411 FAX 949-766-7687

 

US DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BROWNSVILLE DIVISION

 

TAITZ,                      )                              Case # 14-cv-00119

 V                                )       HONORABLE ANDREW S. HANEN PRESIDING

JOHNSON, ET AL   )

REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO 11.26.2014 MOTION

 

  1. PLAINTIFF IS NOT ENGAGED IN POLITICAL DISCUSSION

Defense claims that Plaintiff is engaged in political discussion. This is not the case. Plaintiff is not seeking an opinion on whether the US Congress should pass an immigration reform or amnesty.

Plaintiff is seeking to stay immigration policies by the defendant, which violate the law and cause damage to the plaintiff. This is not a political discussion.

 

  1. DEFENSE TACITLY ADMITS THAT FLAST V COHEN GRANTS STANDING TO TAXPAYERS AND THAT IT IS NOT LIMITED TO THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE. DEFENDANT’S OPPOSING CASES ARE NOT RELATED TO FLAST AND NEVER OVERTURNED FLAST STANDING FOR TAXPAYERS WHICH IS CLAIMED BY THE PLAINTIFF

Previously, defense claimed that Flast v Cohen 392 U.S. 83 (1968)

is limited to Establishment clause cases. Plaintiff provided Flast v Cohen Supreme Court opinion, which clearly shows that Flast v Cohen is not limited to the Establishment clause cases and grants Article III standing to any taxpayer, like the plaintiff herein, Taitz, and it relates to every action by the government, where the action originates under the taxing and spending power of the US Congress and the action is unlawful.

Defense attempted to create an impression that Flast v Cohen was somehow overturned and brought three cases, all of which were completely different from Flast v Cohen and different from the case at hand.

Flast governs only cases, which are related to federal spending, originating in taxing and spending clause of the US Congress. Defense, however, brought forward two cases related to state spending and local taxes and one case related to HEW transfer, not an exercise of Congressional taxing and spending power.

Defense brought forward Valley Forge Coll. v. Americans United, 454 U.S. 464 (1982). However, in Valley Forge the court found that respondents are without standing to sue as taxpayers, because the source of their complaint is not a congressional action but a decision by HEW to transfer a parcel of federal property, and because the conveyance in question was not an exercise of Congress’ authority conferred by the Taxing and Spending Clause, but by the Property Clause. Cf. Flast v. Cohen, supra. Pp. 454 U. S. 476-482.

Further, Daimler Chrysler v Cuno 547 U.S. 332, 343 (2006), also, does not negate Flast v Cohen. In Daimler, The city of Toledo and State of Ohio sought to encourage DaimlerChrysler Corp. to expand its Toledo operations by offering it local property tax exemptions and a state franchise tax credit. A group of plaintiffs including Toledo residents who pay state and local taxes sued in state court, alleging that the tax breaks violated the Commerce Clause. The taxpayer plaintiffs claimed injury because the tax breaks depleted the state and local treasuries to which they contributed the city of Toledo , Ohio was seeking to give tax relief to Daimler Chrysler. Plaintiffs sought standing as state taxpayers in relation to state tax expenditures.   Daimler did not overturn Flast v Cohen and did not even relate to Flast v Cohen, as in Daimler the plaintiffs sued as state taxpayers challenging local taxes.

Lastly, in Az. Christian Sch. Tuition Org. v. Winn, 131 S. Ct. 1436, 1442 (2011)

A group of Arizona taxpayers challenged a state law providing tax credits to people who donate to school tuition organizations providing scholarships to students attending private or religious schools. Again, this is a state law case, not originating in Congress’s standing and taxing power.  Further, defense misrepresented Az. Christian ruling. Ultimately, the Supreme Court found that any damages or harm claimed by the taxpayers by virtue of simply being a taxpayer would be pure speculation because the issue at hand was a tax credit and not a government expenditure. Justice Scalia filed a concurring opinion, joined by Justice Thomas.

Furthermore, it appears that justices of the Supreme court are considering not to limit, but to extend Flast, to cover state taxpayer actions as well.
In her dissent, Justice Kagan said “cash grants and targeted tax breaks are means of accomplishing the same government objective—to provide financial support to select individuals or organizations.”id  She further argued: “taxpayers should be able to challenge the subsidy.”id  The dissent was joined by Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, and Sotomayor. Bruce Peabody, a political science professor at Fairleigh Dickinson University, remarked “the case brought out four dissents, a signal that those justices were prepared to decide the substantive issue.” Equally, Peter Woolley, professor of political science and director of the PublicMind Poll, posited “in making this ruling on such narrow grounds, the court virtually guarantees that plaintiff in one guise or another will be back another day.

So, all three cases brought by the defense do not negate Flast v Cohen and do not negate taxpayer status of the plaintiff herein.

So, based on Flast v Cohen, as argued in FAC and prior pleadings, Taitz is assured Article 3 legal standing. Moreover, ethically, it is, probably, one of the most important issues of civil rights. With Congressional spending out of control, incomprehensible eighteen trillion dollar debt, taxpayer standing is a paramount right and one of the most important checks and balances, which can be exercised by the citizens, as taxpayers.

  1. 11.26.2016 MOTION RELATES TO AN ONGOING ACTS AND PROPERLY BEFORE THE COURT

As part of her legal action at hand, Plaintiff is seeking a declaratory relief deeming actions by the defendants in DACA to be unlawful and she is seeking an injunction against DACA.

Plaintiff submits that current expansion of immigration policies in shielding from deportation millions of illegal aliens and granting them work permits and Social Security benefits, represents continuation and expansion of the same lawless action by the defendants, which started in 2012. Such actions are illegal and unconstitutional per Crane v Napolitano 12-cv-03247 (Exhibit 3 April 23, 2013 opinion by USDC Judge Reed O’Connor)  “…8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(1), with id. § 1225(b)(2).   Sections 1225(b)(2)(B) and (C) also provide specific exceptions to the initiation of removal proceedings required by Section 1225(b)(2)(A).   Given the use of the mandatory term “shall,” the structure of Section 1225(b) as a whole, and the defined exceptions to the initiation of removal proceedings located in Sections 1225(b)(2)(B) and (C), the Court finds that Section 1225(b)(2)(A) imposes a mandatory duty on immigration officers to initiate removal proceedings whenever they encounter an “applicant for admission” who “is not clearly and beyond a doubt entitled to be admitted.” id

 

In 2012 defendant Obama announced that he will shield from deportation  an estimated 1.2 million illegals, who are minors.

On November 20 2014, he simply expanded the  same lawless action by extending it to millions more illegals, who are over 18. According to Obama their number stands at 5 million, according to Sheriff Babeu (Exhibit 1) to 20 million people.

Both DACA and current, November 20, 2014 immigration action represent the same lawless pattern, continuation of the same lawlessness.

In both  actions Barack Obama announced that he will shield from deportation large groups of illegal aliens and he will grant them work permits and Social Security cards and benefits.

In both cases Obama never signed any such orders, he only verbally announced them. Plaintiff believes that Obama, who used to be a licensed attorney, before he surrendered his license,  knew that such orders were not grounded in any law or authority and should he sign such executive orders, he would be subject to impeachment and criminal prosecution. So, Obama just made a verbal announcement and left his underlings, secretaries of DHS to sign lawless memoranda -orders to shield millions of illegal aliens from deportation and grant  them work permits and SSN cards.  In 2012, former Secretary of DHS Napolitano signed such orders calling them DACA. Shortly, after signing DACA, Napolitano was rewarded with a golden parachute, $700,000 per year  in salary and benefits, given to her by Obama’s supporters on the board  of regents of the University of California.

After Napolitano’s departure, her position was filled with Jeh Johnson, who extended DACA and on November 2014 he extended this shield of deportation further, to include millions more illegals. Johnson and Obama claim that this executive action extends to about 5 million illegals, who have been in the country for at least 5 years.

Sheriff Babeu, of Pima counted, Arizona, blew the whistle on Jeh Johnson and publicly revealed that Johnson have forwarded a directive to all 23 agencies under DHS, telling them that anyone who illegally crossed the border and have been in the country since January of this year, 2014, will be eligible to deportation deferral, which is 20 million people.   (Exhibit 1). Taitz suspects that there will be a golden parachute for Johnson as well.

So, based on the actions by the defendants, recent immigration actins by the defendants represent a continuation of the same 2012 lawless shield of deportation, which the plaintiff is seeking to be declared unconstitutional and unlawful and enjoined by the court.

These actions are akin to one being engaged in the same pattern of a repeated tort. Let’s take an example of one being engaged  in repeated acts of conversion or embezzlement. In this hypothetical the plaintiff is seeking a declaratory relief and injunctive relief to stop these acts of embezzlement. Let’s imagine, there is an additional instance of embezzlement. In this situation the plaintiff would ask the court to issue an injunctive relief to stop an additional act of embezzlement, which is a part and parcel of an ongoing tort. For that reason plaintiff does not believe that she needed to file for a leave of court to file a second amended complaint. However, if it will please the court, the plaintiff will file a second amended complaint and will expressly include  12.20.2014 immigration actions by the defendants or will file a separate legal action reflecting 12.20.2014 actions by the defendants and will seek the leave of court to consolidate both actions.

  1. 12.20.2014 IMMIGRATION ACTIONS BY THE DEFENDANTS INCREASED DAMAGES SUSTAINED BY THE PLAINTIFF

12.20.2014  immigration action by the defendants increases damages suffered by the plaintiff in multiple ways:

  1. First Amended Complaint includes actual and impending damages due to the fact that these acts of massive shield from deportation, become a magnet for thousands of illegals, who cross the border, who are being trafficked by the defendants all over the country, and who spread multiple infectious diseases affecting a group of doctors, such as plaintiff, who are treating these illegal aliens. This represents an ongoing action, as well as an ongoing violation of the 5th and 14th amendment, taking without due process, taking of thousands of dollars due to missed time from work and medical bills. New immigration action will be a magnet to more illegal aliens to cross the border and spread more infectious diseases.
  2. 12.20.2014 immigration action extended the original 2012 shield from deportation and granted work permits to adults. This means that there will be millions of adults competing for work. Plaintiff is a professional, she is both a licensed attorney and a licensed doctor of dental surgery. Per Washington Alliance of Technology workers v US Department of Homeland security 14-cv-00529-ESH USDC District of Columbia plaintiff will have even stronger standing, as now millions of adults, among them professionals, such as the plaintiff, will be competing with her for work. Under Alliance of Technology workers, the court found that seven month extension of working visas for STEM workers, created an increased competition for US workers. The court concluded that increased competition for work created a concrete and particularized injury.

 

 

Several recent court opinions support such declaratory relief and weigh in favor of the ruling for the plaintiff:

  1. In US v Escobar 2-14-cr-00180 AJS the court finds executive action by Obama to shield large groups of illegal aliens from deportation and grant them work permits and Social security cards, to be unconstitutional and an abuse of executive power and a violation of separation of powers. Since DACA and November 20, 2014  represent the same action of shielding from deportation large groups of people and granting them work permits and SSN cards, this opinion relates to both actions and weighs in favor of granting defendants requested injunctive relief, specifically declaratory relief deeming DACA unconstitutional(Exhibit 2 December 16, 2014 Opinion by Judge Schwab in US v Juarez -Escobar 14-cr-00180 AJS USDC Western District of PA)

The court in Escobar-Juarez finds: “1.   Inaction by Congress Does Not Make Unconstitutional Executive Action Constitutional

President Obama contended that although legislation is the most appropriate course of action to solve the immigration debate, his Executive Action was necessary because of Congress’s failure to pass legislation, acceptable to him, in this regard. This proposition is arbitrary and does not negate the requirement that the November 20, 2014 Executive Action be lawfully within the President’s executive authority. It is not.

“In the framework of our Constitution, the President’s power to see that the laws are faithfully executed refutes the idea that he is to be a lawmaker. The Constitution limits his functions in the lawmaking process to the recommending of laws he thinks wise and the vetoing of laws he thinks bad.”  Youngstown, 343 U.S. at 587.

Congress’s lawmaking power is not subject to Presidential supervision or control. Youngstown, 343 U.S. at 587.  Perceived or actual Congressional inaction does not endow legislative power with the Executive. This measurement – – the amount/length of Congressional inaction that must occur before the Executive can legislate – – is impossible to apply, arbitrary, and could further stymie the legislative process.

 

The temporal limits of so called “inaction” is arbitrary because of considerations such as when the “clock” on inaction would begin and how long inaction would have to persist before otherwise unlawful legislative Executive Action would become lawful. For example, would it be permissible for a President, who was dissatisfied with a high tax rate on long term capital gains (as limiting economic growth), to instruct the IRS to only collect taxes at a rate of 15% rather than the legislative prescribed 20% rate, or defer prosecution of any taxpayer who pays at least 15% but not the full 20%, unless Congress “pass a bill” lowering the rate within a specified time period? Both this IRS scenario and the Executive Action at issue in this case violate the separation of powers.

President Obama stated that the only recourse available to those members of Congress who question his wisdom or authority in this regard would be to “pass a bill” and that “the day I sign that bill into law, the actions I take will no longer be necessary.” Presidential action may not serve as a stop-gap or a bargaining chip to be used against the legislative branch. While “the power of executing the laws necessarily includes both authority and responsibility to resolve some questions left open by Congress that arise during the law’s administration,” it does not include unilateral implementation of legislative policies. Utility Air Regulatory Group v. E.P.A.,134 S.Ct. 2427, 2446 (Jun. 23, 2014).

Further, President Obama’s belief that this Executive Action is within his executive authority is not dispositive because “the separation of powers does not depend on the views of individual Presidents, nor on whether ‘the encroached-upon branch approves the encroachment.’”  N.L.R.B., 719 F.3d at 241, citing Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, 561 U.S. 477, 130 S.Ct. 3138, 3155 (2010), quoting New York v. United States, 505 U.S. 144, 182 (1992).  Likewise, Congress’s alleged “failure” to pass legislation invalidating or limiting past Executive Actions or Orders relating to deferred action does not evidence that such exercises are lawful, and does not constitute a grant of legislative authority to the Executive.

This Executive Action “cross[es] the line,” constitutes “legislation,” and effectively changes the United States’ immigration policy.  The President may only “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed . . . ”; he may not take any Executive Action that creates laws.  U.S.

Const., Art. II, § 3.”

Further, the court finds that Obama’s actions exceed prosecutorial discretion:

“However, President Obama’s November 20, 2014 Executive Action goes beyond prosecutorial discretion because:

(a) it provides for a systematic and rigid process by which a broad group of individuals will be treated differently than others based upon arbitrary classifications, rather than case-by-case examination; and

(b) it allows undocumented immigrants, who fall within these broad categories, to obtain substantive rights.” id

Further, the court finds it unconstitutional, the fact that this executive action provides illegal aliens with benefits and quasi-citizenship

” The Executive Action provides for a process by which undocumented immigrants will become quasi-United States citizens, such that the status given to those within President Obama’s Executive Action could not be “terminated at any time.” id

“[President Obama’s] Executive Action crosses the line, constitutes legislation, and effectively changes the United States’ immigration policy. The President may only ‘take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed…’; he may not take any Executive Action that creates laws….President Obama’s unilateral legislative action violates the separation of powers provided for in the United States Constitution as well as the Take Care Clause, and therefore, is unconstitutional.” id

The court reached a conclusion:

Conclusion

President Obama’s unilateral legislative action violates the separation of powers provided for in the United States Constitution as well as the Take Care Clause, and therefore, is unconstitutional. ” id

  1. Crane v Napolitano 12-cv-03247 (Exhibit 3 April 23, 2013 opinion by USDC Judge Reed O’Connor) states that DHS does not have a prosecutorial discretion in not deporting large groups of illegal aliens. In Crane deportation officers sought injunction relief against 2012 immigration  policies shielding illegals from deportation and granting them work permits.  Judge O’Connor  in his April 23 decision ruled that plaintiffs are likely to prevail on the merits, as such actions by the defendants are unlawful and unconstitutional, however, due to the fact that plaintiffs were federal employees, Judge O’connor ruled that under CSRA (Civil Service Reform Act) plaintiffs have to seek relief administratively within agency, not in federal court.  However, in case at hand, plaintiff is not a federal employee, so such limitation does not apply to her and as such this decision in Crane weighs heavily in favor of ruling for the plaintiff.
  2. In their pleadings, defendants claim that individuals do not have standing to challenge immigration policies. This is negated by yet another recent decision in Washington Alliance of Technology workers v US Department of Homeland security 14-cv-00529-ESH USDC District of Columbia. In her November 21, 2014 opinion Judge Ellen Segal Huvelle ruled that individuals have standing to challenge immigration policy.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

12.18.2014

Sheriff Babeu: Immigration Order Will Defer 20M Deportations

Monday, 15 Dec 2014 08:57 PM

By Cathy Burke

As many as 20 million undocumented immigrants will qualify for President Barack Obama’s deferred deportation action, says Paul Babeu, sheriff of Pinal County, Arizona.

The number would be an alarming increase from the estimated 5 million initially expected to qualify under the executive action.

But in a Monday interview on Fox News’ “Your World With Neil Cavuto,” Babeu contended that the new figure came directly from Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson. 
“The fact is, it’s not just the 5 million that President Obama promised, we learned that Jeh Johnson, the Secretary of Homeland Security, put out a six-page memo and he said that anybody who’s been here since January of this year, anybody prior to that date, they are allowed to stay here. There will be deferred action,” Babeu told Cavuto.

“This number that President Obama promised would be 5 million is now 20 million illegals.”

Asked to clarify how he knows the number jumped to 20 million, Babeu insisted it was straight from Johnson.

“President Obama said on TV, ‘if you’ve been here five years or more, there will be deferred action, that you’ll be given a work permit, a driver’s license, all access to our social programs,'” Babeu explained.

“But Jeh Johnson, the very same day, put out a memo directed to all 23 agencies under the Department of Homeland Security saying that any illegal who’s been here this year as of January of 2014, they are entitled to this deferred action.”

Babeu said that interpretation would surely mean the situation for states along the nation’s southern border “is going to get worse”

“It sends the wrong message,” he said. “It’s a big neon sign flashing … that make it to the border and you’re home free.”

The outspoken sheriff is the subject of speculation in Arizona that he may have congressional aspirations in 2016, according to the Arizona Republic, which notes the Republican has already filed his first contribution reports for a federal political action committee.

“Turn on Fox News and there he is, ripping President Barack Obama on immigration and tearing into Washington for its failure to secure the border with Mexico,” political consultant David Leibowitz told the Republic. “Babeu is relentless on that issue — a poor man’s [Sheriff] Joe Arpaio — and immigration is likely to remain a top-tier issue come the next election cycle.”

Constantin Querard, another political consultant, said Babeu already has good name recognition around Arizona and noted that his “favorability numbers were last measured at 54 percent statewide and nearly 80 percent in Pinal County, and he is a proven fundraiser who could likely raise millions more than previous GOP nominees.”

“So long as the Obama administration continues to pursue open-border, pro-amnesty policies, candidates who are demonstrably strong on border issues will do very well in border states like Arizona,” Querard told the Republic.

“Since Obama’s march towards amnesty shows no signs of slowing, that bodes well for potential candidates like Sheriff Paul Babeu, in 2016 and beyond.”

Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/Newsfront/Paul-Babeu-sheriff-20-million-undocumented/2014/12/15/id/613205/#ixzz3MALwuMMD

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Paul-Babeu-sheriff-20-million-undocumented/2014/12/15/id/613205/?ns_mail_uid=36764352&ns_mail_job=1599623_12162014&s=al&dkt_nbr=7ngmfbpl

Obama: I’m Jewish ‘in my soul’… Please, somebody, give me another barf bag. Obama has less than 5% approval in Israel and is considered a US president who is the most hostile towards Israel

Posted on | December 18, 2014 | 9 Comments

Obama: I’m Jewish ‘in my soul’…

I just got this e-mail from Obama, and I seriously need a hygienic bag (a barf bag). He is propping a communist tyrant and is flaunting it as a great achievement. I lived in the communist tyranny and it is horrible, wouldn’t wish it on anyone

Posted on | December 18, 2014 | 6 Comments

President Barack Obama <info@mail.whitehouse.gov>

11:31 AM (9 minutes ago)

to me
The White House, Washington

 

Yesterday, after more than 50 years, we began to change America’s relationship with the people of Cuba.

We are recognizing the struggle and sacrifice of the Cuban people, both in the U.S. and in Cuba, and ending an outdated approach that has failed to advance U.S. interests for decades. In doing so, we will begin to normalize relations between our two countries.

I was born in 1961, just over two years after Fidel Castro took power in Cuba, and just as the U.S. severed diplomatic relations with that country.

Our complicated relationship with this nation played out over the course of my lifetime — against the backdrop of the Cold War, with our steadfast opposition to communism in the foreground. Year after year, an ideological and economic barrier hardened between us.

That previous approach failed to promote change, and it’s failed to empower or engage the Cuban people. It’s time to cut loose the shackles of the past and reach for a new and better future with this country.

I want you to know exactly what our new approach will mean.

First, I have instructed Secretary of State John Kerry to immediately begin discussions with Cuba to re-establish diplomatic relations that have been severed since 1961. Going forward, we will re-establish an embassy in Havana, and high-ranking officials will once again visit Cuba.

Second, I have also instructed Secretary Kerry to review Cuba’s designation as a State Sponsor of Terrorism — a review guided by the facts and the law. At a time when we are focused on threats from ISIL and al Qaeda, a nation that meets our conditions and renounces terrorism should not face such a sanction.

Third, we’ll take steps to increase travel, commerce, and the flow of information to — and from — Cuba. These steps will make it easier for Americans to travel to Cuba. They will make it easier for Americans to conduct authorized trade with Cuba, including exports of food, medicine, and medical products to Cuba. And they will facilitate increased telecommunications connections between our two countries: American businesses will be able to sell goods that enable Cubans to communicate with the United States and other countries.

Learn more about the steps we’re taking to change our policy.

These changes don’t constitute a reward or a concession to Cuba. We are making them because it will spur change among the people of Cuba, and that is our main objective.

Change is hard — especially so when we carry the heavy weight of history on our shoulders.

Our country is cutting that burden loose to reach for a better future.

Thank you,

President Barack Obama

It looks like Obama’s appointee judge is trying to derail Arpaio’s case quickly, by tomorrow, by finding no subject matter jurisdiction in DC

Posted on | December 18, 2014 | 2 Comments

Arpaio’s case was filed in DC. His attorney is licensed in DC, but not in AZ. Presiding judge, Obama appointee,  actually told defendants attorneys to convert their opposition motion into a motion to dismiss the whole case. She set a very tight schedule. She gave defendants  one day to respond and she gave Arpaio one day to reply. Reply is due today, within hours. When a judge issues such order, she tells the parties, what she is trying to do. She is seeking to dismiss under FRCP rule 12b(1), lack of subject matter jurisdiction in DC. What she might state is that Arpaio might refile in AZ, however his attorney is not licensed in AZ, so this appears to be a way to get rid of the case.

I night be wrong, but that what it looks like based on her orders.

Vladimir Putin: The West Wants to Chain the Russian Bear, Pull It’s Teeth and Stuff It

Posted on | December 18, 2014 | 3 Comments

Vladimir Putin: The West Wants to Chain the Russian Bear, Pull It’s Teeth and Stuff It (Video)

Yet again Obama uses prisoner exchange as an excuse, this time he props Communist tyranny of Cuba when Russia and Venezuela can’t do it

Posted on | December 18, 2014 | 4 Comments

Not long ago Obama used the release of a Muslim deserter Bowe Bergdahl as an excuse to release a number of top, most dangerous Muslim terrorists from GITMO and send them on vacation to Qatar.

Now he is at it again. He could have secured the release of Allan Gross by simply releasing one of Cuban spies in the US custody. However, Obama, close friend of domestic communist- terrorist, William Ayers, used the release of Gross in order to help the communist tyranny of Castro brothers.

As we know, currently Saudi Arabia is trying to regain it’s market share of oil market by drastically reducing the price of oil from the high of $120 to $59 per barrel. This is a significant hit on other oil producing countries, such as Venezuela and Russia. Venezuela is at near bankruptcy. Russian ruble is dropping like a rock. These two countries were long time allies and benefactors of the communist tyranny of Cuba. Venezuela was providing Cuba with oil nearly for free. Now it can’t do so. Russia has to tend to its’ own problems. So, Obama comes to the rescue. Yesterday he normalized diplomatic relations with Cuba, which inevitably will lead to the flow of the US dollars to prop 50 year old Castro tyranny.

Sadly, Obama yet again abused his executive power because he knows that congress, FBI, AG and judges will do nothing to stop him. After all, they covered up his use of bogus IDs.    Table of evidence 06.09.2013 of forgery and fraud

by Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

Raul Castro Urges Obama To Use ‘Executive Action’ To Overrule Congress

Posted on | December 17, 2014 | 8 Comments

Raul Castro Urges Obama To Use &#8216;Executive Action&#8217; To Overrule Congress

Raul Castro Urges Obama To Use ‘Executive Action’ To Overrule Congress

 

Marco Rubio on Obama’s Cuba Deal: “Worst Negotiator in Modern US History” Taitz to Rubio: Obama is not a bad negotiator, he is a good communist, these last 2 years he is and will be unleashing the terror, he always wanted to unleash. He has nothing to lose, he knows Congress is too corrupt to impeach him, many judges are too corrupt to hear on the merits cases against him

Posted on | December 17, 2014 | 4 Comments

Marco Rubio on Obama’s Cuba Deal: “Worst Negotiator in Modern US History” (Video)

from a contributor, Harry: I am surprised they did not FORGE an executive order-because they did that with the birth certificate-the press can still cover up for Obamas crimes-

Posted on | December 17, 2014 | 5 Comments

Harry9
2 approved

I am surprised they did not FORGE an executive order-because they did that with the birth certificate-the press can still cover up for Obamas crimes-

Press Release: Obama files an opposition to motion by Taitz and admits there was no Executive Order signed

Posted on | December 16, 2014 | 12 Comments

Press Release: Obama files an opposition to motion by Taitz in Taitz v Jeh Johnson, Sylvia Burwell, Barack Obama and admits there was no Executive Order signed

Taitz v Johnson Opposition to 11.26.2014 motion

Obama writes:

“Dr. Taitz’s recent motion challenges immigration-related guidance memoranda
issued by DHS on November 20, 2014, although Dr. Taitz incorrectly describes the
guidance memoranda as an “Executive Order,” which it is not.”

“…And the Court can take
judicial notice of the fact that no “executive order” was announced during the President’s
address”

Further, Obama claims that Taitz lacks standing as a tax-payer, however this is patently false, as the Supreme Court in Flast v Cohen, via decision penned by the Chief Justice Earl Warren found that US tax payers have standing to challenge actions by the government, as long as those actions relate to spending allocated by the Congress based on it’s spending and taxing power and those actions  are illegal.

Further, Obama’s actions in recent amnesty are a continuation of the illegal DACA policy, which was started by Obama in 2012, where Obama flagrantly violates US immigration laws and grants deferral of deportation to large classes of illegal aliens and grants them works permits and Social Security cards.

I need help in finding this Pennsylvania case of Juarez Escobar, where fed, judge stated that Obama’s amnesty is unconstitutional. Do not see anything in PACER under Juarez Escobar in PA recently

Posted on | December 16, 2014 | 11 Comments

BREAKING: Federal judge finds Obama amnesty is unconstitutional …

www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message2744677/pg1
3 hours ago – 31 posts – ‎11 authors

He will be deciding on the aspects of Obama’s immigration dictates being unconstitutional, in the actual case brought by Orly Taitz. Judge Hanen is the SAME ..

Posted on | December 16, 2014 | 7 Comments

Mr. Obama never was, and is not now, the core of the problem, … therefore the eviction of the latter’s person from the White House, through “Impeachment” or otherwise, cannot terminate America’s on-going national nightmare. Mr. Obama always was and remains merely the pen with which at this moment others are charting the serpentine course for “the destruction of the U.S. Constitutional Republic” ­ just as Bush, Clinton, and other real Presidents were only temporary figureheads on a ship of state they did not actually captain, sailing to a destination to which perhaps they were not even privy.

* * * * * *

The economic facts are that, even if his handlers could contrive to throw Mr. Obama under the bus without soiling their own skirts, and did instal an ostensible Goody Two Shoes “reform” figure in the office of President in order to placate an angry populace, the nationwide banking and monetary collapse looming over this country would not be stopped, or even significantly slowed, in its fatal course. The Powers That Be in the District of Columbia and New York City are fully aware of this — which is why they are laying the logistical groundwork for “martial law” (or, as the new buzz-phrase has it, “state of emergency”) throughout the land, by para-militarizing State and Local law-enforcement agencies at a frantic pace, in order to be ready to put down with maximum brutality the social disorder and civil disobedience which will break out across the continent when the economy melts down.

Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr., Ph.D., J.D.

California controller warns of $72 billion unfunded retiree benefits! It means there will be more taxes

Posted on | December 16, 2014 | 1 Comment

California controller warns of $72 billion unfunded retiree benefits

(Reuters) – California State Controller John Chiang warned on Tuesday of a growing $71.8 billion unfunded liability to cover the state’s retiree health and dental benefits. The cost is up $7.2 billion from 2013, in part due to new mortality assumptions that men live two years longer than previously

Posted on | December 16, 2014 | 1 Comment

How much was the bribe , sorry, campaign contribution for Kevin Yoder, to expose the taxpayers to 303 trillion of derivatives debt? Write to FBI, demand an investigation, whether there was a bribe. Similarly, how much was the bribe, sorry, campaign contribution to Obama, Boehner and others to violate the immigration laws and give millions of cheap labor to Mark Zuckerberg, Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, George Soros to other ruling billionaires?

Congressman Goes MIA After Tucking Wall Street Bailout Into Government Spending Bill

WASHINGTON — For all the anger among progressives about a Wall Street bailout provision that made its way into the just-passed $1.1 trillion government spending bill, there’s been little attention on the person who put it in there.Meet Congressman Kevin Yoder (R-Kansas).Yoder, a second-term…

Huffington Post

Mark Levin To The GOP: I AM ONE INCH AWAY FROM LEAVING YOU!

Posted on | December 16, 2014 | 3 Comments

Mark Levin To The GOP: I AM ONE INCH AWAY FROM LEAVING YOU!

The Right ScoopMark Levin ripped Republicans a new one tonight as he opened his show tonight, saying that he is one inch away from leaving the Republican Party.He starts in

Fox Nation

Posted on | December 16, 2014 | No Comments

Virginia W.
42 approved

Well said Morgan. Could agree more with your tribute to Dr. Taitz. I’m sure millions are contemplating sitting it out rather than fattening the wallets of the RINOs who put us here. Very sad day in America when we can count on one hand the reps who abide by our U.S. Constitution.

God bless you, all true American patriots and our Dr. Orly & her family for the selfless sacrifices they have made.

Obama appointee judge is getting ready to dismiss Arpaio’s case

Posted on | December 16, 2014 | 2 Comments

12/16/2014 MINUTE ORDER (paperless) TO SHOW CAUSE why the defendants’ 13 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction (“Defs.’ Opposition”) should not be construed as a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). The defendants shall file a notice with the Court by 12:00 PM on December 17, 2014 explaining whether their opposition should be construed as a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(1). The plaintiff may file a reply in light of the issues raised by Defs.’ Opposition by 5:00 PM on December 18, 2014. Signed by Judge Beryl A. Howell on December 16, 2014. (lcbah2) (Entered: 12/16/2014)
12/16/2014 Set/Reset Deadlines: Response to Show Cause due by 12:00 PM on 12/17/2014; Reply due by 5:00 PM on 12/18/2014. (tg, ) (Entered: 12/16/2014)

Senator Ted Cruz stands up to corrupt GOP leaders

Posted on | December 16, 2014 | 1 Comment

Ted Cruz Hits Back At GOP Critics: ‘Enough Is Enough’

Posted: Updated:

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) on Monday staunchly defended his decision to force a procedural vote in opposition to President Obama’s immigration action, a move that ultimately proved a political boon to Democrats. Cruz said that Republican leaders needed to “honor their word” and block the immigration initiative.

“The answer is always tomorrow,” Cruz said on The Sean Hannity radio show, in reference to efforts to roll back the immigration action. “At some point, what the heck are we doing? Either stand up and demonstrate the principles we keep promising voters we believe or pack it up already.”

“They use the term selfish to actually honor the commitments made to your constituents. That’s not playing the rules of the game,” Cruz added. “Well you know what? The rules of the game have resulted in bankrupting our kids and grandkids, and seeing our constitutional liberties eroded, and enough is enough.”

Seen as a Tea Party favorite and possible 2016 candidate, Cruz was ripped by his fellow GOP colleagues because the move allowed Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) additional time to confirm some ofPresident Obama’s most contested nominees.

“You should have an end goal in sight if you’re going to do these types of things, and I don’t see an end goal other than irritating a lot of people,” Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) said.

“I think most Republicans think that Christmas came early for Democrats,” Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) told Roll Call. “I haven’t seen Harry smile this much in years, and I didn’t particularly like it.”

But in his Monday interview, Cruz brushed off the criticism and argued that the Senate should have a say on the matter.

“They were angry because they did not want to fight this fight now and [Utah Republican Sen.] Mike Lee and I thought it was important to get a vote now to get the Democrats on record,” Cruz said of his Republican colleagues. “And we hoped to get every Republican on record against executive amnesty. But leadership was angry, and so they aggressively whipped against a vote, saying that amnesty was unconstitutional.”

Only 22 Republicans voted with Cruz’s point of order, which challenged the constitutionality of Obama’s immigration action. Had he succeeded in convincing a majority of senators, the entire government spending bill would have gone back to the House, setting up another showdown over long-term funding. But Cruz was optimistic that come January, more Republicans would stand with him.

“I am hopeful and I’m taking them at their word that they were jumping ship because of concerns on the procedural tool. But come January, come February, they have committed up and down that they’re going to be here to stop amnesty. And at the end of the day it’s not what we say, but what we do,” Cruz said.

TRUMP: ‘This Country Doesn’t Need Another Bush’…

Posted on | December 16, 2014 | 5 Comments

 

http://dailycaller.com/2014/12/15/donald-trump-teases-audience-with-presidential-aspirations/

One of the largest talk show hosts in the country is contemplating to do, what Attorney Orly Taitz did: leaving the GOP and becoming an independent voter. The leadership of both parties is corrupt, sold out 320 Americans. Time for clean paper and pencil elections, throw all corrupt scum out of the WH, Congress and elsewhere in the government. brittons are rising against both corrupt ruling parties, so should Americans

Posted on | December 16, 2014 | 6 Comments

Talk-radio star &#039;inch away&#039; from leaving GOP

Talk-radio star ‘inch away’ from leaving GOP

 

One of 2.5 million political prisoners in the US, Barrett Brown, goes on trial tomorrow

Posted on | December 16, 2014 | 2 Comments

Michael Krieger | Barrett Lancaster Brown is a writer and activist who possesses a unique combination of ability, courage, wit and determination.

Our media is publishing garbage, made up stories, but does not publish the biggest story, truthful accounts and evidence showing Obama using a stolen CT SS 042-68-4425 and fabricated IDs (evidence below)

Posted on | December 16, 2014 | 1 Comment

NEW YORK Mag’s Boy Genius Investor Made It All Up…

Bogus phone numbers raise fresh doubts about ROLLING STONE gang rape story…

Table of evidence 06.09.2013 of forgery and fraud 

So far I do not see confirmation anywhere: was Carolyn Colvin confirmed as a Commissioner of Social Security?

Posted on | December 16, 2014 | 4 Comments

Carolyn Colvin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Carolyn Colvin
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Acting
Incumbent
Assumed office
January 19, 2013
President Barack Obama
Preceded by Michael Astrue
Personal details
Born May 27, 1942 (age 72)
Arnold, Maryland, U.S.
Political party Democratic Party
Alma mater Morgan State University

Carolyn W. Colvin has been the Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration in the United States since February 14, 2013, having succeeded Michael J. Astrue. On June 20, 2014, President Barack Obama nominated her to serve as the commissioner.[1] On September 18, 2014, the United States Senate Committee on Finance approved her nomination by a 22-2 vote.[2]

Previously, she was the Deputy Commissioner, having been nominated by Obama and confirmed by the United States Senate in 2010. She had previously worked at the Social Security Administration during the 1990s.[3][4]

15,000 March Against Muslims In Dresden

Posted on | December 16, 2014 | 1 Comment

15,000 March Against Muslims In Dresden

15,000 March Against Muslims In Dresden

 

Massacre: Taliban storms Pakistan school, killing 126, mostly children

Posted on | December 16, 2014 | 2 Comments

Massacre: Taliban storms Pakistan school, killing 126, mostly children

SYDNEY SIEGE hostage taker told Barack Hussein Obama to stop hiding his (Muslim) religion

Posted on | December 16, 2014 | 3 Comments

http://www.barenakedislam.com/2014/12/16/sydney-siege-hostage-taker-told-barack-hussein-obama-to-stop-hiding-his-muslim-religion/

Two Hostages Killed In #SydneySiege Died Trying To Save Other Hostages

Posted on | December 16, 2014 | 2 Comments

Two Hostages Killed In #SydneySiege Died Trying To Save Other Hostages

Two Hostages Killed In #SydneySiege Died Trying To Save Other Hostages

#Ferguson Mob Taunts Judge at Her Home – Media Calls It “Activism”

Posted on | December 15, 2014 | 4 Comments

#Ferguson Mob Taunts Judge at Her Home – Media Calls It “Activism”

SECURITY BREACH? Power failure at White House, State Department, cause unknown: official

Posted on | December 15, 2014 | 3 Comments

SECURITY BREACH? Power failure at White House, State Department, cause unknown: official

SECURITY BREACH? Power failure at White House, State Department, cause unknown: official

 

Siege ends, police stormed the cafe, 2 hostages are believed to be killed, several wounded, Iranian Muslim terrorist is believed to be killed

Posted on | December 15, 2014 | 2 Comments

Sydney siege ends: Police storm cafe

USA TODAY  – ‎2 minutes ago‎
Police stormed a Sydney cafe early Tuesday Australian time, apparently ending a dramatic hostage crisis that had dragged on for more than 16 hours.

Sen. Elizabeth Waren is a Harvard law prof. If she is really concerned about bankers looting the tax payers, why isn’t she filing a legal challenge for a STAY and injunction? Or is it just a show and self promotion for her?

Posted on | December 15, 2014 | 2 Comments

Sen. Warren Warns That Spending Bill Sets Dangerous Precedent

NPR  – ‎1 hour ago‎
The government opens this week after a dramatic weekend. The Senate approved a $1.1 trillion spending bill despite protests from the left and the right.

on Paul: all I want for Christmas, is a real government shutdown. That is what I was saying all along: limited temporary government shut down pales in comprison to the grand theft being pulled by the Congress and WH through this spending bill

Posted on | December 15, 2014 | 1 Comment

All I Want for Christmas is a (Real) Government Shutdown

The political class breathed a sigh of relief Saturday when the US Senate averted a government shutdown by passing the $1.1 trillion omnibus spending bill. This year’s omnibus resembles omnibuses of Christmas past in that it was drafted in secret, was full of special interest deals and disguised spending increases, and was voted on before most members could read it.

Full article here: http://http://tinyurl.com/p4vs9ar

Sydney siege shows that every citizen should have a gun for self defense. The siege would have been over within minutes and gunman killed, if citizens were to have guns for self defense.

Posted on | December 15, 2014 | 8 Comments

Sydney siege: Gunman issued demands, threats

USA TODAY  – ‎15 minutes ago‎
A hostage crisis at a central Sydney cafe dragged deep into the Australian night with a lone gunman issuing demands and claiming to have bombs scattered around the city, multiple media outlets were reporting Monday.

Islamists’ take 20 hostages in Sydney cafe siege: live

Posted on | December 14, 2014 | 7 Comments

Top Stories

‘Islamists’ take 20 hostages in Sydney cafe siege: live

Telegraph.co.uk  – ‎11 minutes ago‎
… • As many as 20 hostages taken by gunmen in Sydney cafe • Black flag with Arab writing held against cafe window • Armed police seal off local area in Martin Place • Police earlier arrest man in counter-terror operation …

Muslim extremists holding a black flag with Muslim writing took hostage people inside a store in Sydney, Australia. Police blocked the area, situation is tense and unpredictable, demands of hostage takers are unclear

Posted on | December 14, 2014 | 1 Comment

Hostage situation reportedly unfolding in Sydney chocolate shop

SYDNEY –  A major police operation was underway in downtown Sydney on Monday, where several people inside a chocolate shop could be seen through the windows with their hands held in the air. New South Wales state police would not say what was happening inside the shop or whether hostages were being…

Fox News13 mins ago

Very important! Reid canceled confirmation hearing for Carolyn Colvin for commissioner of SSA. Next year her nomination will be handled by GOP. Demand questions about her cover up of Obama’s use of a stolen CT SSN 042-68-4425. We have to expose and stop this charlatan sitting in the WH with a stolen SSN

Posted on | December 14, 2014 | 2 Comments

Table of evidence 06.09.2013 of forgery and fraud 

Senate cancels vote on Obama Social Security pick

Obama pick to head Social Security runs into more trouble; Senate cancels confirmation vote

Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama’s pick to head the Social Security Administration has run into more trouble after Senate Democrats canceled a procedural vote on her nomination.

Obama nominated Carolyn W. Colvin to a six-year term as commissioner in June, and Colvin’s nomination cleared one procedural hurdle in the Senate Saturday. However, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., canceled an upcoming vote, making it likely Colvin won’t get a vote until next year, when Republicans take control of the Senate.

Colvin’s nomination would have taken up valuable floor time as the Senate rushes to finish its year-end business. Senators could speed the process but that would require a bipartisan agreement.

Colvin’s nomination first ran into trouble when a group of Republican senators said they would try to block it while investigators look into a $300 million computer project at the agency.

The project, which doesn’t work, predates Colvin’s tenure — she has been acting commissioner since Feb. 2013. But an inspector general’s investigation is ongoing.

“I don’t know how the Senate can, with good conscience, vote to confirm anyone with this type of ongoing investigation going on around their immediate office,” Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, said in a floor speech. “It may very well turn out that Ms. Colvin did nothing wrong, but we need to know for sure.”

Colvin defended her integrity and her long career in government in a recent interview with The Associated Press.

“I’ve worked in government my entire life. There’s never been a suggestion, personal or professional, of any wrongdoing,” Colvin said in the interview, which had been scheduled before the controversy erupted.

“I’m certainly not ending my career with that,” Colvin continued. “I came out of retirement to help this organization, not hurt it.”

Six years ago, Social Security embarked on an aggressive plan to replace outdated computer systems overwhelmed by a flood of disability claims. But the project has been racked by delays and mismanagement, according to an assessment commissioned by the agency over the summer.

The new computer system is supposed to help workers process and manage disability claims. But the project is still in the testing phase and the agency can’t say if it will ever be operational or how much it will cost.

Colvin, 72, first worked as a deputy commissioner at Social Security in the 1990s. She left the agency in 2001 to become director of human services for the District of Columbia. She later had a similar job in Montgomery County, Maryland.

Colvin returned to Social Security in 2010 as deputy commissioner.

___

Follow Stephen Ohlemacher on Twitter: http://twitter.com/stephenatap

I need your help in research. I wonder if there is any way for the citizens and taxpayers to stop this dumping of 303 trillion dollars of derivatives debt on FDIC American tax payers

Posted on | December 14, 2014 | 3 Comments

I need your help in research. I wonder if there is any way for the citizens and taxpayers to stop this dumping of 303 trillion dollars of derivatives debt on FDIC and American tax payers, which will complete bankrupt the US treasury and destroy the US economy.

As you know, practically in the middle of the night the Congress passed this 2015 spending bill with a change to the Dodd-Frank agreement. this change will allow highly risky swaps containing derivatives to be dropped on FDIC and ultimately us, the taxpayers.

I wonder if there is any way to stop it.

There are 3 thing that I wanted to check:

1. can you help me by reviewing all of the FDIC provisions. Maybe there is a provision specifically preventing such an amendment

2. we need to review all Dodd -Frank documents. Maybe there is a provision somewhere stating that there has to be a specific waiting period, public notice and public discussion prior to any amendment being made. There was no waiting period or public discussion

3. this amendment was buried within 1600 pages of a spending bill. Maybe there is a provision in the rules of  congress specifically prohibiting major changes to existing laws within spending bills.

Also, we can contact Senator Elizabeth Warren. She can continue her fight. I remember Senator Johnson of WI filed a legal action challenging a change in ACA, aka Obamacare. I wonder if Warren can file a legal challenge against this major change to Dodd-Frank done in the middle of the night

Bribery of Congress

Posted on | December 14, 2014 | 3 Comments

Tyler Durden's picture

Democrats Who Voted For The Cromnibus Received Double The Money From Wall Street Than “No” Voters

It should come as no surprise that Republicans would be willing to vote for a bill that seeks to indemnify Wall Street from future failure. After all, Wall Street’s proximity to the GOP, and vice versa, is hardly a contentious issue. And yet, it was “only” 162 republicans who voted for the Cromnibus – some 67 voted against. Which means that whipping the 57 democrats who also voted for the Bill to get the crucial 218 passing votes was far more critical to assure passage of the swaps push out provision.  What exactly motivated those 57 Democrats to break ranks with the rest of their party – the 139 democrats voted against the spending bill – and to be not only on the receiving end of Elizabeth Warren’s ire, but also accountable for dumping a few hundred trillions of derivatives into the laps of US taxpayers. The answer, what else: money.

 

Posted on | December 14, 2014 | 4 Comments

AMB
0 approved

If Judge Hansen gives Dr. Orly Taitz a Christmas gift by being on her side, those Republicans in both Houses who voted for the spending bill will feel ashamed of themselves.
Let us pray that the Judge will make a decision soon before the end of this month.

Paying US debt is now mathematically almost impossible. Congress sealed the US bankrupcy

Posted on | December 14, 2014 | 11 Comments

zerohedge.com/news/2014-12-12/paying-down-debt-now-almost-mathematically-impossible …

Senate passed the mega -theft spending bill with 56 votes (32 Dems and 24 Repubs). see the names below

Posted on | December 13, 2014 | 2 Comments

Senate Passes $1.1 Trillion Spending Bill, 56-40 — 5th Update
Senate roll vote on $1.1 trillion spending bill

Call every senator, demand “NO” on omnibus, et them know that we will work very hard to throw out of office every senator who is complicit in this mega-theft

Posted on | December 13, 2014 | 7 Comments

NumbersUSA URGENT ACTION
MELANIE OUBRE
Please call your 2 US Senators today, beginning at noon ET. Demand they vote “no” on CRomnibus
Dear NumbersUSA Activist,

The Senate is back in session today after Senators Mike Lee and Ted Cruz blocked Harry Reid from fast-tracking a government spending bill that will fully fund the President’s executive amnesty.

Senate staffers will be answering phones on Capitol Hill beginning atnoon eastern time today. It is looking like the Senate may be in session until 1 a.m. Sunday morning.

Please take a few minutes out of your Saturday to help save American workers by fighting this executive action.

CALL YOUR 2 US SENATORS
202-224-3121

When the staffer answers, simply tell him or her:

I urge you to vote ‘NO’ on the CRomnibus spending bill unless it defunds President Obama’s executive amnesty.

Senators Cruz, Lee, and Sessions may force a “point of order” vote that will, at the least, get every single US Senator on the record regarding Obama amnesty funding. Details are still being worked out. So for the time being, please keep calling in opposition to the CRomnibus bill that will fund the executive amnesty.

Thank you for your devoted activism,

MELANIE
OUBRE

Obama: I Spoke With & Joked With Raul Castro. Considering the fact that Castro tortured dissidents in labor camps, by the same token Obama could talk and joke with Stalin or Hitler, if they were alive today

Posted on | December 19, 2014 | No Comments

Obama: I Spoke With & Joked With Raul Castro (Video)

Posted on | December 19, 2014 | 1 Comment

205_157646 (1)

Eleventh Sierra Leone doctor dies from Ebol

Posted on | December 19, 2014 | No Comments

Eleventh Sierra Leone doctor dies from Ebola
Ban urges respect for health rules in Ebola fight

Dumbing down and brain washing of our children

Posted on | December 18, 2014 | No Comments

Adan Salazar | “I think that’s definitely a good idea,” one petition supporter said.

Posted on | December 18, 2014 | No Comments

U.S. Appeals Court Expands Gun Rights

A federal appeals court in Cincinnati deemed unconstitutional a federal law that kept a Michigan man who was briefly committed to a mental institution decades ago from owning a gun.

The Wall Street Journal54 mins ago

NKOREA PLANNED ATTACKS ON NUKE PLANTS

Posted on | December 18, 2014 | No Comments

 

keep looking »