Posted on | May 22, 2013 | 7 Comments
Judge apologizes for lack of transparency in James Rosen leak probe
The chief judge of the District’s federal court issued an unusual order Wednesday, apologizing to the public and the media for not making certain court documents widely available online.
The gesture of transparency by U.S. District Judge Royce C. Lamberth comes at a time when the Obama administration is under scrutiny for an unprecedented number of leak investigations, including one showing that the Justice Department had secretly probed the news-gathering activities of Fox News reporter James Rosen.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled on Tuesday.
Walter Pincus MAY 20
The Associated Press leak investigation isn’t as clear-cut as the uproar makes it out to be.
The investigation of Rosen was first reported Monday, after The Washington Post obtained court documents containing details of the case.
A federal judge had ordered the documents unsealed in November 2011, but they were kept sealed for 18 months and not posted on the court’s online docket until last week, after The Post inquired about them.
Lamberth blamed a series of administrative errors and said a review of the “performance of the personnel involved is underway.” He also said he was creating a new category on the court’s Web site where all search and arrest warrants will be made public unless they fall under a separate sealing order.
At issue were three 2010 search warrants issued as part of the Rosen probe.
The investigation centered on a former State Department arms expert, Stephen Jin-Woo Kim, who was indicted in 2010 for allegedly disclosing national defense information to Rosen, Fox’s chief Washington correspondent.
Rosen has not been prosecuted, but the Justice Department’s characterization of him in the search-warrant affidavit as a possible “co-conspirator” has alarmed civil libertarians as well as First Amendment watch
Posted on | May 22, 2013 | 7 Comments
|
|
Fellow Conservatives:
 Senator John McCain (R-AZ) is attacking conservatives again. This time, he’s upset at their efforts to stop a backdoor increase in the debt limit.
As you know, the House and Senate each passed budget resolutions earlier this year. Neither budget included an increase in the debt limit, yet House and Senate leaders want to air-drop one into a final agreement negotiated behind closed doors.
They want to do this because it allows them to avoid an open debate on the issue and pass it in the Senate with only 51 votes rather than the 60 votes normally required.
Thankfully, Senators Rand Paul (R-KY), Mike Lee (R-UT), and Ted Cruz (R-TX) are working to stop this secret plan to raise the debt limit.
 They have objected to Harry Reid’s request to create the budget conference several times and are insisting on an agreement to keep it from being used to increase the debt limit.
Yesterday, John McCain defended Harry Reid on the Senate floor and criticized Rand Paul, Mike Lee, and Ted Cruz. McCain called their efforts “bizarre” and “out of line”.
What’s out of line is a Republican senator working with the Democrats to raise the debt limit while nobody is looking.
This raises a couple questions:
First, how much longer can we tolerate John McCain and his hostility toward conservatives and our principles? He already lashed out at Senators Paul, Lee, and Cruz earlier this year, calling them “wacko birds” for standing up for the Constitution. Now he’s at it again.
POLL QUESTION: If John McCain runs for re-election again in 2016, should SCF work to find a strong candidate to defeat him in the Republican primary?
 Second, where is Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY) while all of this is happening? As the Republican leader, shouldn’t he also be fighting to stop this backdoor increase in the debt limit?
The outcome of the upcoming debt limit debate is a test of McConnell’s leadership. He worked with President Obama to raise the debt limit in 2011 and he helped the president raise taxes and fund Obamacare earlier this year. Americans need more principled leadership from him.
We’re grateful that Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, and Mike Lee are standing strong. If the debt limit is raised, it must be done through regular order where it can be fully debated and where conservatives can demand a balanced budget and the full repeal of Obamacare.
Thank you for supporting the principles of freedom that make this country great.
Best regards,
Matt Hoskins
Executive Director
Senate Conservatives Fund |
|
|
Posted on | May 22, 2013 | 7 Comments
townhall.com
Former IRS Commissioner Visited White House 118 Times During Tea Party Targeting
Katie Pavlich | May 22, 2013
According to Republican Rep. Jim Jordan and White House visitor logs, former IRS Commissioner Douglas Shulman visited the White House 118 times in 2010 and 2011.
This is the same time period when Tea Party groups were inappropriately targeted and intimidated by the IRS.
Testifying in front of lawmakers on Capitol Hill Wednesday, Shulman admitted that many of the meetings with the White House were to discuss how to implement ObamaCare.
“The IRS has a major roll in the money flow,” Shulman said.
Shulman denied ever discussing 501c(4) groups with White House officials and failed to name who he met with during his visits. At the time Shulman met with the White House throughout 2010 and 2011, Tea Party and Patriot groups were expressing opposition to ObamaCare.
Inspector General Russell George said during testimony that he did not speak with anybody in the White House about targeting of Tea Party groups during his audit and did not ask IRS officials if they communicated with the White House about the targeting.
“We did not question anybody about whether they talked to the White House,” George said.
Posted on | May 22, 2013 | 3 Comments
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ
29839 Santa Margarita pkwy, ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita
Request for a retraction by Huffington Post
Dear Ms. Huffington
Kindly please post a retraction and correction of an article by John Celock ”Tim Jones, Missouri House Speaker, Cites Birther Connection In Fundraising Letter”. Please, see the article below.
For several years now Mr. Celock has engaged in journalistic malpractice and posted time after time untrue and outright defamatory information about me and my legal actions. If the defamation does not stop and true information is not published, I will consider a legal action against Mr. Celock. and Huffington Post.
For example, in the current article, as in multiple articles before, he failed to report that no legal challenge against Obama was resolved on the merits, no judge has issued an order to compel production of the original (wet ink) birth certificate, original Selective Service certificate and the original Social Security application for the CT SSN 042-68-4425 of Harrison J. Bounel, which Obama is fraudulently using. No Judge has ever ruled that Obama has a valid Social Security number, valid Selective Service Certificate and a valid birth certificate. No original documents were ever produced and the copies produced for public consumption were deemed to be laughable forgeries by multiple experts and officials. All of the legal actions were dismissed on technical reasons, due to standing and jurisdiction. When Mr. Celock omits such important fact, he misrepresents the truth, he creates an impression that the legal actions challenging Obama’s forged IDs were deemed to be with no value on the merits, he is attempting to create impression that Obama’s IDs were proven to be valid, when in reality it is the opposite and by doing so he defames the attorney bringing the legal actions. Similarly he placed in the false light the speaker of the House of the State of MO, who was one of the plaintiffs in my action.
Further on Mr. Celock grossly misrepresented the truth and a report by a licensed investigator and a former elite Scotland Yard officer Neil Sankey which showed that according to multiple national databases Obama’s name is connected to multiple Social Security numbers and addresses. None of those Social Security numbers were issued in HI. Most addresses are made up and there is a suspicion that those units of bogus SSNs and addresses are linked to illegal fundraising. This suspicion is being reinforced by recent discovery that a charity by Obama’s half brother, Maliq Obama, used addresses for a UPS store and a drug rehab as addresses for the pro Obama charity of Maliq Obama. This did not raise the red flag and did not trigger additional scrutiny of the IRS, the application of Maliq Obama was approved by the IRS within 35 days, while applications by legitimate Tea-party organizations are lingering for years and while I personally threatened and intimidated by an IRS attorney Mitzi Torri, who is running an attack web site together with Obama’s personal attorney Scott J Tepper and other federal and state high ranked employees.
Moreover, there is a high probability that the charity of Obama’s brother, Kenyan citizen Maliq Obama, was actually conceived by Barack Obama himself and Maliq Obama was used as a tool for a modest cut.
Let us not forget some other instances with questionable transactions. While serving as a state senator Obama recieved some $140,000 from his friend Robert Blackwell, who ran some ping pong tournaments. Later it was found that Obama used his position of the state senator to get a state grant of some $330,000 for Blackwell. So there is a suspicion that $140,000 paid by Blackwell to Obama was actually a bribe to Obama as a state official, a cut of about 30% for obtaining state funds as a grant for a private business.
Later Obama, as a U.S. Senator, secured a million dollar grant for the Chicago university hospital and his wife Michelle suddenly got a board position at that hospital with a $340,000 salary. What did she do on that board? She is not a doctor and her law licensed was placed on involuntary inactive status only 4 yers after she got out of law school and long before she got on that board. She could not help the hospital in any way as her knowledge in medicine probably equals your knowledge in space travel. When Michelle Obama resigned, her “extremely mportant” position on the board was not replaced by anyone.There is a suspicion that her $340,000 salary was a bribe to senator Obama, his usual 30% cut of from $1 million yearly grant of our tax payer funds funnelled to a private facility.
Further, Obama was the Chair of the “Annenberg challenge”, a charity which was supposed to improve academic performance of Chicago children. After 6 years the performance of students in Annenberg schools was as poor as the performance in the nearby schools. However, during this time 160 million was donated to this charity and according to professor Steven Diamond as much as 500 million went through ths charity. The records of this charity are currently sealed at the library of the University of Chicago. You and Huffington Post should be investigating how 160-500 million dollars can be spent with zero results. Was their a scheme of running ”donations” through the charity in order to avoid the taxation and getting most of the funds back minus minor expenses and a cut for someone???
This are legitimate questions that have not been answered yet, just as none of Obma’s original (wet ink) IDs were seen yet.
Furthermore, I demand that you review the attached document forwarded to the Inspector General of the IRS, SSA and Judiciary Committees of the U.S. House of Representatives and US Senate. It is your duty to report the facts and investigate criminal behavior of the top officials, not defame a civil rights attorney, who is fighting corruption, criminality, fraud, forgery, Social Security fraud and possibly treason.
Ms. Hiffington, the public expects from you and your publication honesty and integrity and not journalistic malpractice, not complicity in the cover up of Obama’s use of bogus Social Security numbers and laughable forgeries as IDs.
I am requesting a response within 2 weeks from the date of receipt of this letter sent by Certified mail.
Respectfully,
/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ
www.huffingtonpost.com/news/orly-taitz-lawsuit
11 hours ago
Tim Jones, Missouri House Speaker, Cites Birther Connection In Fundraising Letter
Posted: 02/11/2013 4:12 pm EST | Updated: 02/11/2013 6:08 pm EST
Although he has downplayed his involvement in the past, the Republican speaker of the Missouri House of Representatives appears to defend his connection to a “birther” lawsuit in a new fundraising push.
House Speaker Tim Jones (R-Eureka) does not directly reference the birther movement in the email, but he links to a blog post by Randy Turner on The Huffington Post and a video clip of MSNBC anchor Chris Matthews, both of which discuss recent comments Jones made on a Missouri television program explaining his involvement in a 2009 lawsuit claiming President Barack Obama was born in Kenya. The links are part of a fundraising solicitation Jones sent out last week.
“The national liberal media, including The Huffington Post and Chris Matthews of MSNBC, are attacking me for standing up to the dangerous Obama agenda,” Jones wrote. “You can help me send a message to these liberals that Missouri will not back down in the fight against federal overreach, taxation and tyranny.”
Jones, who is also the Missouri state co-chairman for the conservative American Legislative Exchange Council, was recently elected to help lead the Washington-based Republican Legislative Campaign Committee. He declined to comment for this story.
Jones was one of several state legislators to join the 2009 lawsuit filed by birther leader Orly Taitz, which also included former Republican presidential candidate Alan Keyes as a plaintiff. The lawsuit claimed Obama was not born in the United States and sought to have the president removed from office, as well as to limit his ability to make judicial appointments and handle military policy until the suit was resolved. Plaintiffs also claimed that the president and first lady Michelle Obama held dozens of legal residences in the Los Angeles and San Francisco areas. Among the addresses Taitz cited for the first lady were those of Walt Disney Studios and the headquarters for the Los Angeles Times. The lawsuit was dismissed.
On Feb. 3, Jones appeared on “The Jaco Report,” a Missouri political news show, where he explained his involvement in the lawsuit. Jones said on the show that he got involved at the request of a “very personal constituent of mine.” He did not reveal the constituent’s identity and said that he now believes Obama settled the matter by showing his birth certificate.
Turner’s blog post criticizing Jones centered largely on the Missouri lawmaker’s involvement in the Taitz lawsuit, but also noted his positions on several Missouri-centric issues, including pushing right-to-work legislation, Medicaid cuts and gun rights in the state.
Taitz celebrated Jones’s 2010 election as House majority leader in Missouri, calling him an “unapologetic birther” on her website. Jones downplayed Taitz’s praise to PoliticMo.com at the time, saying of the birther lawsuit, “I’ve never really made that a really important part of anything I’ve done.”
George Connor, a political science professor at Missouri State University, said he does not believe that Jones’s involvement in the birther movement will cause the lawmaker long-term harm, at least in state Republican circles. Connor said as Republican primaries become increasingly conservative, Jones’s ties to birtherism could in fact help his electoral chances.
“If Tim Jones would have any political trouble from this issue, it would be distancing himself from it,” Connor said of the birther movement. “The challenge to Republicans in Missouri is from the right. I don’t see the birther issue or his stance on it becoming an issue. For the most part, everyone is past that.”
Connor noted that Jones’s biggest worries are a looming fight with Gov. Jay Nixon (D) over the governor’s push to expand Medicaid in Missouri and Jones’s support for right-to-work laws. Republicans hold super-majorities in both houses of the Missouri state legislature.
Posted on | May 22, 2013 | 1 Comment
6 hours ago
… Alan West, Louie Gohmert, Sarah Palin, Todd Akin, Mark Sanford, Carl Palidino, Jim DeMint, Rick Perry, Sharon Angle, Orly Taitz… …
www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread946685/pg1 - Cached
There are 53 Dems in the Senate and 2 independents who are de facto Dems (thanks a lot RINO Olympia Snow, who suddenly resigned and GOP lost the second senator in Maine). So Dems have 57. If just 3 corrupt senators who voted in the judiciary committee vote against the filibuster, the Dems will have the needed 60 votes to avoid the filibuster.
Please, shame the h….. out of these senators, as well as vulnerable Dems with the hope that they will at least vote for filibuster or abstain If Dems do not have 60 votes, this Mega amnesty can be filibustered for quite some time.
Posted on | May 22, 2013 | 3 Comments
Immigration bill heads to full Senate AP - 6 hrs ago
If you recall, I sent letters to 4 of the 5 GOP senators, who voted against the mega amnesty.
Please, keep pushing, demand filibuster, demand they disclose the fact that Obama is using forged IDs and a stolen SSN, show that he failed E-Verify. Congress cannot enforce E-Verify of millions of illegals, when they do not enforce and cover up failed E-Verify of a criminal sitting in the WH. Let me know, if you can organize a protest in front of the U.S. Senate against Flake, Graham and Hatch who joined the bought and paid for democrats to steal your jobs and wages.
Contact your local tea party and numbers U.S. See if a protest can be organized.
One activist sent this in email:
“You are part of our first line of defense against amnesty and 33 million work permits for foreign job seekers over the next 10 years and your help is needed this week. You have a Senator(s) on the Senate Judiciary Committee that will vote on S. 744 tomorrow, Wednesday, May 22.”
We don’t need another immigration “reform” bill. Enforce the laws on the books. Vote NO on S. 744.
PLEASE call your U.S. Senator first thing this morning. Flood their offices with calls and faxes. Also, if you can (it only takes a couple of minutes) call the following “gang” members: Marco Rubio, Jeff Flake, Juan McCain, Patty Pancake Murray, Maria Cantwell and Chuck Schumer. Give them a piece of your mind, politely. You can find your senator and phone number below. If you can’t get through on the DC number, call their district office:
We are the last line of defense. EVERY phone call will count. We defeated the globalists in 2007. We can do it again this time. This amnesty is Obama’s great wish. Defeat him.
Did you see this one?
Senate panel OKs tax-welfare benefits for new immigrants
They’re not “new immigrants”. They are liars, cheats and thieves and now we’re supposed to slave away trying to put food on the table for our families only to be raped in more taxes for more welfare? The HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS of dollars stolen from us in taxes to pay for illegals (welfare, food stamps, education, housing and crime) is all borrowed debt from foreign governments.
Every penny stolen from us by the IRS is eaten by interest on the congressionally created “national” debt and transfer payments (UN dues, IMF and other financial institutions). This country is over $120 TRILLION in debt and now we’re to be raped, again, big time to reward those who cheated their way into our country?
Illegal Immigration – The $113 Billion Dollar Drain on the American Taxpayer
800,000 Illegals Ordered Deported Remain in US, Could Receive Benefits — YOUR paycheck
This is 1986 and Ronald Reagan all over again – only a million times worse. Open the flood gates to more financial destruction for our states, not to mention crime:
Illegal Alien Rapes Baltimore Girl 1 Year after City Becomes Sanctuary
Gang of 8 Bill Would Legalize Tens Of Thousands Of Illegal Aliens With Criminal Convictions
Schumer-Rubio Amnesty Would Legalize 45 Percent of ICE Criminal Caseload
Posted on | May 22, 2013 | 1 Comment
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
29839 Santa Margarita Parkway, STE 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688
Tel: (949) 683-5411; Fax (949) 766-7603
E-Mail: dr_taitz@yahoo.com, orly.taitz@gmail.com
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Dr. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ, PRO SE §
Plaintiff, §
§
v. § EMERGENCY
§ MOTION FOR
Michael Astrue, Commissioner of the § RECONSIDERATION
Social Security Administration, § 11-cv-00402
§
§
§ Honorable Royce Lamberth
Respondent § Chief Justice presiding
Request FOR A JUDICIAL NOTICE FILED IN Conjunction with AN EMERGENCY MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
PETITIONER ORLY TAITZ REQUESTS A JUDICIAL NOTICE OF THE OFFICIAL SSNVS (SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER VERIFICATION SYSTEMS) REPORT SHOWING THAT THAT BARACK OBAMA FAILED SSNVS AND IS USING A CONNECTICUT SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER 042-68-4425 WHICH WAS NOT ASSIGNED TO HIM. This report is accompanied with a confirmation and authentication of Colonel Gregory Hollister, who personally obtained the report.
Plaintiff Pro Se Dr. Orly Taitz (hereinafter “Taitz”) hereby requests that the Court take judicial notice of the aforementioned document attached as Exhibit 1.
This request is made pursuant to Rule 201 (a), (b)1, (b)2, (c)2 of the Federal Rules of Evidence.
RULE 201. JUDICIAL NOTICE OF ADJUDICATIVE FACTS
(a) Scope. This rule governs judicial notice of an adjudicative fact only, not a legislative fact.
(b) Kinds of Facts That May Be Judicially Noticed. The court may judicially notice a fact that is not subject to reasonable dispute because it:
(1) is generally known within the trial court’s territorial jurisdiction; or
(2) can be accurately and readily determined from sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned.
(c) Taking Notice. The court:
(1) may take judicial notice on its own; or
(2) must take judicial notice if a party requests it and the court is supplied with the necessary information.
(d) Timing. The court may take judicial notice at any stage of the proceeding.
(e) Opportunity to Be Heard. On timely request, a party is entitled to be heard on the propriety of taking judicial notice and the nature of the fact to be noticed. If the court takes judicial notice before notifying a party, the party, on request, is still entitled to be heard.
(1) is generally known within the trial court’s territorial jurisdiction; or
(2) can be accurately and readily determined from sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned and under 201 C (2) must take judicial notice if a party requests it and the court is supplied with the necessary information.
The report in question is relevant to the proceeding as Petitioner Taitz is seeking a reconsideration of the decision by this court, whereby this court previously upheld the decision by the SSA to deny her release of the SS-5 for the Social Security number 042-68-4425 requested under FOI 5U.S. 552 due to privacy considerations. In her motion for reconsideration Taitz provides newly discovered evidence showing that the Social Security number in question was assigned to Harrison J. Bounel, an immigrant from Russia, born in 1890 and SS-5 should be released under the 120 year rule. Fed. R. Evid. Rule 201. Under Fed. R. Evid. Rule 201(f) judicial notice may be taken at any stage of the proceeding. Government of Canal Zone v Burjan, 596 F.2d 690, 694 (5th Circ. 1979).
Aforementioned record is relevant for the request for the judicial notice as according to acxiom.com/identity-search database there were two individuals using the SSN 042-68-4425: Harrison J. Bounel and Barack Obama. Only one person can legally own a specific Social Security number. According to SSNVS report this number does not match with the name Barack Obama, therefore by process of elimination it belongs to Harrison (Harry) J. Bounel and it should be released under the 120 year rule of the SSA.
CONCLUSION
This court should take the Judicial notice of the SSNVS report showing that the Social security number 042-68-4425 does not belong to Barack Obama. Since Obama used the aforementioned number in his tax returns, this constitutes a Social Security fraud, IRS fraud and identity theft and justifies a requested emergency hearing .
Respectfully submitted
/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ
President of the Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
05.18.2013
cc Inspector General of the Social Security Administration
cc senator Chuck Grassley ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee
cc Congressman Bob Goodlatte Chair of the House Judiciary Committee
cc Daryl Issa, Chair of the House Oversight Committee
cc Inspector general of IRS
Category: HOT ITEMS!,
Latest News,
Legal Actions,
Obama Fraud Gate,
Orly Taitz civil rights leader,
Orly Taitz doctor and attorney,
Orly Taitz Obama birth certificate,
Orly Taitz Obama social Security number,
Orly Taitz ObamaFraudGate,
Other Criminal or Suspicious Activities,
Supporting Documentation,
Uncategorized
Posted on | May 22, 2013 | No Comments
REPORT: DOJ Seized Records of Five FOXNEWS Phone Numbers…
… INCLUDING PARENTS OF TARGETED REPORTER
REPORT: US ATTY INVESTIGATING FOX DONATED TO OBAMA…
CBSNEWS reporter: My computers hacked, too…
‘Began in Feb. 2011 during reporting on ‘Fast and Furious”…
Posted on | May 22, 2013 | 2 Comments
First I’ll remind you of hawaii’s HR 338-18 that Hawaiian officials love to quote!
They use this to stymie any access to their PUBLIC RECORDS! especially obama’s
birth certificate!
Now read this!!!
Hawaii Constitution;
Article III
Bills Enactment
Section 14
No law shall be passed except by bill. Each law shall embrace but one subject, which shall be expressed in it’s title.
The enacting clause of each law shall be, ” Be it enacted by the legislature of the State of Hawaii.”
HR 338-18 does NOT have a PUBLISHED enacting clause in the statute, this alone voids the statute!
The Hawaiian health department cannot quote or invoke an invalid law!
And should they choose to insert the enacting clause now, they’ll have admitted
to committing FRAUD! breach of their oaths of office,..
Breach of oath as you know is perjury! Perjury is a federal felony!
Posted on | May 22, 2013 | 7 Comments
keep looking »
Atlas Shrugs
Alan Keyes - Loyal to Liberty
FedUpUSA.Net
Post & Email
Rick Baker Show
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 
The People's Senator. 
