I am proven to be correct yet again: after 2 years of fundraising Sheriff Arpaio will not file a criminal complaint against Obama, Mike Zullo is planning to write a book, which will be another money maker but will not remove Obama from office.
Posted on | May 18, 2013 | 11 Comments
2 years ago Sheriff Arpaio held a press conference stating that the tea party contacted him, advised him that fraud was committed in Maricopa county, Obama ran for office in Maricopa county based on fraud and using forged IDs, they were seeking a criminal complaint by Arpaio, as a duly elected sheriff, to be filed against Obama and his accomplices before the 2012 election.
Arpaio and his right hand cold case investigator Mike Zullo spent 2 years doing PR, regurgitating information provided to them by me, by Chief investigator of the U.S. Coast guard Jeffrey Stephan Coffman, by Paul Irey, by Douglas Vogt and others, held fund raisers and never filed a criminal complaint.
Just recently they were saying: wait 3 more month, 6 more month. Now they are saying that Arpaio has no jurisdiction to file a criminal complaint at all. Are you kidding me? They did 2 years of investigation without any jurisdiction? Really? This is insane.
Let’s take recent conviction of 3 Democratic party operatives in Indiana. They forged signatures of voters, a criminal complaint was filed against them, there was a criminal trial, they were convicted and they are going to prison. That is exactly what is supposed to be happening with Obama and his accomplices, Arpaio needs to file a criminal complaint. Every sheriff around the country needs to file the criminal complaint. Fraud and tender of forged IDs happened in his jurisdiction and in every jurisdiction. People donated to Arpaio because they believed that he, as a duly elected sheriff, will file a criminal complaint. He did not do this.
There is an interesting coincidence. In August of 2012 the feds dismissed their law suit against Arpaio, where they claimed that Arpaio violated civil rights of Hispanics. At the same time Arpaio lowered his visibility and never filed a criminal complaint. Since around the same time only his right hand Zullo is doing interviews, mostly with Carl Gallops.
It is a legitimate question to ask: was there a quid pro quo, was there an understanding that Obama drops his criminal complaint against Arpaio and Arpaio never files his criminal complaint against Obama, in spite of all the evidence???
As members of the public confronted Gallops and Zullo, and demanded answers, Zullo and Gallops tried to attack me, claiming that the fact that I demand that Arpaio file a criminal complaint based on evidence gathered, means that I am somehow helping Obama. Really? Telling the Sheriff to do his job and file a criminal complaint, when he says he has all the evidence of forgery, means that I am helping Obama? How does that work?
Moreover, as Zullo tried to attack me, he admitted that Arpaio will not file a criminal complaint as people expected. He stated at the interview held yesterday that there will not be a complaint under the color of the Sheriff of Maricopa county, but Zullo will write and will tell all because it is his work product.
You say what?
When Zullo is saying that it will not be done under the color of Sheriff of Maricopa county, it means that Joseph Arpaio, Sheriff of Maricopa county, will not do his job as a sheriff and will not file a criminal complaint. When Zullo is saying that he will tell all, it means that it will be another book, tell all book, another moneymaker.
Don’t we have a ton of books already? When people were donating to Arpaio, did they do this so Mike Zullo will write a book and make money on a book, or did they donate so that Arpaio do his investigation and file a criminal complaint? You tell me, what is the answer?
Are people convicted based on writing a book or are they convicted based on a criminal complaint? And what did Zullo mean by work product? Did I and others forward to Arpaio all the evidence, so that Zullo will write a book? People provide evidence to the police and sheriff, so that the police and sheriff file a complaint, not write some tell all story. Evidence is presented for purposes of prosecution, not for profiteering by the investigators, this is a total misuse of the witness testimony, of evidence. It means that evidence was accepted under false pretenses, it means that donations were accepted under false pretenses. If Arpaio thought that he did not have jurisdiction to file a criminal complaint against Obama, he needed to write to the witnesses and experts right away and state that he has no jurisdiction to file a complaint and he should have advised the witnesses, who has jurisdiction.
Arpaio and Zullo had to refund all of the donations given to Arpaio and to the cold case posse and they were supposed to state right then and there, 2 years ago, that Sheriff Arpaio believes that he has no jurisdiction to file a criminal complaint. Otherwise, they mislead the public and they collected donations under false pretenses, giving members of the public an impression that Sheriff Arpaio has jurisdiction to file a criminal complaint. Moreover, while we are on a subject of donations, I personally talked of Joseph Farah of WND, he told me that he has a deal with Gary Kreep, where 50% of donations given by the public to Kreep to file legal actions, where paid by Kreep to Joseph Farah/ WND in exchange for advertising and promotion. Farah told me this as he was hoping for the same deal with me. It is a legitimate question for the public to ask: is there a similar deal between Carl Gallops and Mike Zullo? Is there any arrangement, where Carl Gallops is receiving a part of donations given by the public to Arpaio and Zullo and Cold Case Posse in exchange of promotion of Zullo’s books and solicitation of donations and for personal ad hominem attacks on me? Similarly, did WND, Joseph Farah and Jerome Corsi on one side and Sheriff Arpaio, Mike Zullo and attorney they are working with on the other side, make a deal similar to Kreep’s? If there was such a deal, it will explain, why affidaivt of Mike Zullo was used, even though it is a hearsay, it would explain why this affidavit contained repeated references to Jerome Corsi, but no reference to any of actual investigators who submitted evidence to Arpaio, no mention of Chief Investigator Jeffrey Stephan Coffman, no mention of Paul Irey, Linda Bentley, Douglas Vogt and many others. This would explain, why from January 2012 WND and Carl Galllops were repeatedly reporting on a couple of cases where Larry Klayman was involved as an attorney, even though both cases in FL and AL were dismissed by the presiding judges immediately, and they are not reporting on some 10 cases brought by me and particularly they are not reporting on an ongoing case in MS, where a RICO (racketeering complaint against Obama and his accomplices was filed by me) and even the case in Ca, which was not formally dismissed yet. It is a reasonable question to ask, as it relates to credibility of reporting: every member of the public should demand answers from Carl Gallops, Joseph Farah, Jerome Corsi: was their any payment made, was there any split of danataions given by the public to Sheriff Arpaio, cold Case Posse, Investigator Zullo, attorney Klayman to WND, Carl Gallops, Joseph Farah, Jerome Corsi, PPsimmons and other members of the media? If any split of donations was made, if any money changed hands, this is traceable. Since there is a history of such split between Kreep and WND, it is a reasonable question to ask and the public needs an answer. If payments were made, the public will make its own conclusions to the credibility of statements and reason for lopsided reporting.
Carl Gallops attacked me because I was sanctioned by a corrupt judge, who tried to intimidate and stop me from proceeding with actual legal actions, when a corrupt judge Clay D. Land claimed that it is frivolous to bring a legal action in regards to forged IDs of a Commander in Chief on behalf of the members of the military who are told to risk their lives and take lives based on orders of the criminal who is sitting in the position of the Commander in Chief with all forged IDs.
Yes, Carl Gallops, Mike Zullo and Sheriff Joe Arpaio were never sanctioned, abused, attacked and persecuted by corrupt judges because they never filed a complaint. Where is the complaint from the former police officer Carl Gallops? Where is the complaint from Sheriff Arpaio? Where is the complaint from a former police officer and chief investigator of Maricopa County Cold Case Posse Mike Zullo? They do not exist. When you do nothing, you risk nothing, you surely will not be attacked and persecuted. This is the difference between people who are on the front line, like myself, and people who are just doing press conferences and fund raisers and announcing their upcoming books for early publicity.
Gallops and Zullo attacked me for not winning a case against Obama. Well there were 45 licensed attorneys and hundreds of pro se plaintiffs, who filed cases and did not win, none of the cases were heard on the merits, because as we see it vividly now, we live in a corrupt regime, similar to the Soviet Union. Not one single judge ever ruled against Stalin or Mao or Hitler. This happened not because of civil rights attorneys like myself who actually filed complaints, this happened because of corrupt and spineless sheriffs, governmental officials and sheriffs who had all the evidence against Stalin and Mao and Hitler and never did their job and never filed their complaints.
It is interesting that Carl Gallops is a former police officer in FL and Mike Zullo is a former police officer in NJ. They actually know what to do. If Arpaio is refusing to do his job, they themselves can file a complaint and actually present all the evidence to the District Attorneys. I submitted all the evidence to the District Attorney of Orange County, CA, Tony Rackaucas and I actually posted a certified mail receipt. I, also, submitted a criminal complaint to the District Attorney of Los Angeles County , CA, providing evidence that CA Attorney Scott J. Tepper, personal attorney for Barack Obama and Dem party and a part time investigator with CA Bar, submitted to court in MSin my case a forged birth certificate for Obama and sought to obtain a judicial notice that this birth certificate is authentic, when he had evidence that it is a forgery. I filed a similar complaint with the District Attorney in Jackson, MS. Actually I ask all of my supporters to call the District Attorneys in Jackson MS, Los Angeles CA, Orange County CA and demand that those District Attorneys respond to the public, why didn’t they file a criminal case yet, what are they waiting for, how much damage should be done to the country by usurper Obama until they do their job and file a criminal complaint with the criminal court.
I did my job. Why aren’t Arpaio, Zullo and Gallops submitting a criminal complaint to their DAs? why aren’t they doing their job? Additionally, District Attorney will not accept 56 pages of hearsay. A district Attorney will tell Mike Zullo and Carl Gallops: are you kidding me? You are submitting 56 pages of hearsay which is not admissible in court. You can’t say: our investigators found this. I need the actual written sworn affidavits of those investigators and experts.
District Attorney will demand from Zullo, Arpaio and Gallops something specific, something that I’ve already submitted time and again to court. For example: in his 56 page affidaivit Zullo is stating: our investigators found that Obama’s selective service certificate is a forgery. District Attorney or judge will state: where is the specifics, who is the investigator, I need his name, I need to know how did he reach this conclusion. That is exactly what I provided time and again: I submitted to court an affidavit of a retired Chef Investigator Jeffrey Stephan Coffman, who stated: I am a retired Chef Investigator of the Special Investigations unit of the U.S. Coast guard, I personally examined Obama’s Selective Service certificate, I found this evidence of forgery, I provided this information to the sheriff of Maricopa County Arizona, so that he will file a criminal complaint. Next, Paul Irey provided testimony for me in Indiana: it stated, I am Paul Irey, I have 60 year of experience in typesetting, I found this specific evidence of forgery in Obama’s birth certificate. His testimony was admitted by the judge in Indiana, Judge Reid in Indiana already qualified him as an expert. That what was supposed to be done.
Next, Zullo’s claims that he will testify in the Supreme Court of Alabama. Zullo and Arpaio and Gallops know full well that in 99% of the cases in the Supreme Court of any state there is no oral argument at all. If there is an oral argument, it is only about 15 minutes per side and only on the points of law by attorneys, not witnesses. They know that no witness testimony is allowed. So, when Zullo was confronted with this point, when he was questioned, why is he claiming that he will provide testimony in AL, when no testimony is allowed in higher courts, he responded: an attorney in the case in Alabama wants me in court in case there will be an oral argument, but I do not know for what purpose. Really? Zullo is a former police office. He might be a volunteer with this cold case posse, but he used to be a police officer, he knows that the Supreme Court does not allow witness testimony, particularly not a new witness, who did not testify in the lower court, so Zullo is really misleading the public by saying that he will present testimony, when he knows that no witness testimony is allowed in the Supreme Court.
Please, keep up the pressure. Tell Mike Zullo: we did not donate so that you will write a book, we donated so that justice is done. Arpaio has to file a criminal complaint. If Arpaio is not doing his job, you Mike Zullo, as the Chief Investigator of the Cold Case Posse need to file a criminal complaint with the District Attorney and Attorney General, and please, do not file 56 pages of hearsay, which is not an admissible evidence by any judge, please, provide the District Attorney with the actual sworn affidavits of officers and experts who personally examined the evidence. After the criminal complaint against Obama and accomplices is filed with the DA and AG by Arpaio or if he is not doing the job, by Zullo, we the public, will follow up with the District Attorney and we will demand that the District Attorney do his job and file the criminal complaint with the Criminal Court.
Keep up the pressure, we do not need books and publicity, we need to see filed, signed, stamped criminal complaints!!! Don’t attack me, attack Obama and his accomplices with a properly filed criminal complaint!!!
I hope that ORYR (Obama release your records ) web site and PPSuimmons (aka Carl Gallops) and all the other web sites which published a vicious attack on me, show honesty and integrity and publish this rebuttal.
Ruling mafia puppets in the House of Representatives reached an agreement in principle to push down our throats the mega amnesty and give millions of illegals not just amnesty, our jobs and benefits, but also Obamacare. All of the raging scandals might be a decoy to pull the biggest heist in the World History. Don’t get your eyes of the target. Tell every corrupt congressman: you vote for mega amnesty, we will throw you out in the primary and will prosecute you for treason. You have to be in their faces with biggest signs, shaming them or you and your children will lose your future.
Posted on | May 16, 2013 | 13 Comments
Here is my thought: it might be a coincidence but I am wondering if all 3 scandals going on now, while our ruling criminal enterprise is trying to push for mega amnesty, is too much of a coincidence.
Everyone is now preoccupied with those 3 scandals: Benghazi, IRS, AP, nobody is talking about mega amnesty, about mega robbery of Americans of their jobs and their benefits with the help of the best puppets money can buy.
Bilderberg mafia and its related entities tried to push for amnesty by bringing in young and cute Baba #2, Rubio, he was hard at work trying to sell us damaged goods like a used car salesman, but people were not buying. Most Americans do not want illegals taking their jobs and benefits, so our ruling mafia decided to go to plan B- a decoy. They came up not with one, but with 3 decoys. So now nobody is watching. It is like when a bunch of thugs are sent to steal some piece of garbage in the lobby of a museum and while the police is preoccupied, aces of thievery are stealing a Rembrandt. That is what is going on. Yes, there will be some results to these scandals. The highest probability in terms of the end result, is that a few low level employees will be sacrificed If need be, the ruling criminal oligarchy might even sacrifice Obama, they will give him a card out of jail in the form of a pardon and he will play golf for the rest of his life somewhere in HI or in Mombasa. But at the end of the day, if you are not vigilant and not mobilized, the ruling mafia will pull what it craves the most: mega amnesty, mega heist. Dumb GOP congressmen will sell their own seats, believing that stealing American jobs will make illegals vote for them in the future. This will not happen, as poor illegals will vote for the ones who give them more freebies: Dems.
Your biggest ace in the deck: how can you promise us that you will E-Verify millions illegals when you are criminally complicit in the cover up of Obama’s failed E-verify. Stick my report in their faces, stick Obama’s failed e-Verify. Don’t leave until something gives, until we will find 1 drop of decency in this new Babylon tower of corruption, dirt and bribery called Washington DC.
Demand for investigation and release of information sent to the Inspector General of the Social Security Administration
Posted on | May 16, 2013 | 9 Comments
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
29839 Santa Margarita, ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
Ph. 949-683-5411 Fax 949-766-7603
Attn Patrick O’Carroll Jr.
Inspector General of Social Security Administration
P.O. Box 17785
Baltimore, MD 21235
Via federal Express
Copy via FAX 410-597-2101
Dear Mr. O’Carroll,
Please find enclosed a copy of the complaint filed with the office of the Inspector General of the Department of Treasury as well as with the Judiciary Committee of the U.S. Senate and U.S. House of representatives.
The summary of the complaint is that Mr. Barack Obama has used in his 2009 tax returns a Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425, which was never assigned to him, which failed both E-Verify and SSNVS and which was traced to an immigrant from Russia Harrison J. Bounel, born in 1890, presumed to be deceased with no surviving relatives. I filed multiple complaints with the SSA and even traveled to the CT office and discussed the matter with employees. On March 26, 2013 I traveled to Stamford Connecticut where the number in question was issued and met with employees of the Social Security Administration: Representative Madeline Mercado, Assistant Manager Mrs. Sheridan (she refused to give her first name) and General Manager Mrs. Booker (she refused to give her first name). I demanded an explanation, why SSA is refusing to release the SS-5 for an extremely aged individual over 120 years old. I was told that this is a protected number and local office has no access to the information. I was shown a computer screen that stated that in case of any inquiries in regards to this number, employees of the SSA are supposed to call a specific number at the SSA Headquaters. (it was a 410- MD number). So, there is clearly a gate keeper at this number. This gatekeeper happens to be one Dawn Wiggins, as all the correspondence and FOIA requests in regards to the Social Security number 042-68-4425, which are sent from different parts of the country by different individuals and investigators seeking information on Harrison Bounel and Barack Obama, are always being handled by one SSA employee, Dawn Wiggins, while FOIA requests in regards to other Social Security numbers are handled by different employees. I was advised that General Manager Booker and Assistant Manager Sheridan contacted the headquarters of the Social Security administration and I will receive a response from the headquarters. Over 30 days passed and I did not receive any information. I demand investigation of this flagrant Social security fraud and actions by Ms. Wiggins, who clearly knows that Mr. Obama is using a stolen Social Security number.
Moreover, according to a sworn affidavit of licensed investigator Susan Daniels attached herein, according to national databases at some point Mr. Obama also used Social Security number 485-40-5154 issued to Lucille Ballantyne, mother of former Chief Actuary of the Social Security Administration Harry C Ballantyne. I called Mr. Ballantyne and inquired if he knew that according to National databases Mr. Obama used the Social Security number of his deceased mother. Reaction of Mr. Ballantyne was highly suspect. Any individual confronted with such information would have shown signs of disbelief, anger, however Mr. Ballantyne was not surprised, and he laughed and stated:”They have no rights”. I asked him:”Who has no rights?” He stated “Dead people have no rights”. When I tried to ask more questions, Mr. Ballantyne stated that he cannot talk to me anymore. I believe that Mr. Ballantyne is the SSA employee, who is responsible for the change of the information in the databases and needs to be investigated. I demand computer tracing of any changes in the computer file of Harry J. Bounel to ascertain which SSA employees were involved in this most egregious case of SSA fraud and identity theft. While computer records can be easily changed, the original wet ink SS-5 application cannot be changed, which explains why Social Security administration is refusing to provide SS-5 for Harrison J. Bounel, even though he would be 123 years old, if he would be alive today and according to SSA own “120 year rule” this SS-5 application has to be released. I demand release of SS-5 of the SSN 042-68-4425 for Harrison J. Bounel.
CONCLUSION: Based on the attached complaint and exhibits I demand an immediate release of SS-5 of SSN 042-68-4425 of Harrison J. Bounel, as well as investigation of Barack Obama for his use of a fraudulently obtained Social Security number which failed both E-Verify and SSNVS and immediate investigation of SSA employees Dawn Wiggins, former Chief Actuary Harry C. Ballantyne and former Commissioner Michael Astrue for criminal cover up of Social Security fraud and in being complicit in the usurpation of the U.S. Presidency and the position of the Commander in Chief by Barack Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, aka Barack (Barry) Soebarkah, who is using a fraudulently obtained Social Security number.
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
Cc. Judiciary Committee US House of Representatives
cc. Oversight Committee U.S. House of Representatives
cc. U.S. and International media
Obama didn’t know? Mitzi Torri, IRS attorney, who posted threats, is running the “Fogbow” together with Obama’s personal attorney Scott J. Tepper, who at the same time filed complaints against me with the CA bar. This looks to me like a coordinated attack. all of them need to be brought to testify before Congress and subpoenaed to testify who paid for their convention in Phoenix, AZ
Posted on | May 15, 2013 | 12 Comments
I was absolutely correct. Affidavit of Mike Zullo was attached as an exhibit to the motion to strike the Amicus Curiae brief of AL Dem Party, it is not a part of the underlying case or Appelant’s brief or a reply to the brief by the Appellee, Secretary of State
Posted on | May 15, 2013 | 2 Comments
Please, see for yourselves: Mike Zullo’s affidavit is only an exhibit to the motion to strike the Amicus Curiae (friend of the court) brief by the Democratic Party of AL. I was correct in what I was saying.
This affidavit by Mike Zullo is not a part of the case in the lower court, it is not an exhibit to the Appellate Brief or a reply to the Appellate Brief. Most courts of Appeals or higher courts disregard most of the Amices Curiae, they have absolutely no duty to even look at them. For example Lucas Smith filed a Amicus Cuiae in this case, nobody even bothers to respond to it. So, if the Supreme Court of Alabama decides to simply disregard this Amicus Curiae by the Dem party or strike it from the record, they will also disregard the motion asking to disregard it and an exhibit, affidavit of Mike Zullo, attached to it.
The Supreme Court of AL has a duty to look only at the lower court case, what was filed there, Appellant’s brief, Appellee’s brief and the reply by the Appellant. Affidavit by Mike Zullo is not a part of any of these documents and cannot be considered and will be disregarded by the court just as an exhibit filed by the Alabama Democratic party will be disregarded, as those are new exhibits filed after the case was dismissed in the lower court. The Supreme court, which is reviewing the appeal, needs to rule based on the evidence that existed in front of the judge which reviewed the case in the lower court, to see if this judge made an error. I hope they rule for the plaintiffs/Appellants, however Mike Zullo’s affidavit will have no bearing on this decision. We do not know how the court will rule. I do not know how long does it take for this court to come up with a decision. (can someone check how long does it take for the Supreme Court to rule on average?) In the 9th Circuit it took the court nearly a year from the time it was filed to come to the decision. I filed my case in Judge Carter’s court On January 21, 2009. Decision by the 9th circuit came sometime in the end of 2011.
As I stated that even if the court rules in favor of the plaintiffs and reverses the decision of the lower court, still there is the same problem. Plaintiffs asked for the certified copy of the birth certificate. Look up what the Dem party of MS did in my case in MS: they provided the court with a certified copy of another copy of the same forgery. By the way in MS they made some changes to this forgery according to sworn affidavits. So, what do you do then? The obots will say: you wanted a certified copy, here you go, here is the certified copy. Obama will declare this as yet another victory. He will state: they asked for the certified copy, they got the certified copy, case closed.
For that reason for the hundred and first time I am explaining that Sheriff Arpaio and Mike Zullo need to do their job. Arpaio needs to file a criminal complaint in his county, where he is a sheriff, in Maricopa County, AZ, he needs to file a signed, stamped complaint with the District Attorney and Attorney General. He needs to go to the judge on duty and seek a subpoena for production of the original (wet ink) birth certificate , original Selective Service registration and original SS-5 for the CT SSN Obama is using. Either Sheriff or District attorney can appear before a judge in HI and in DC and seek a reciprocal local subpoena based on a subpoena issued by the judge in the sister jurisdiction in AZ. When they have the local subpoenas, they need to bring the document experts and compare Obama’s originals (if they exist) to the other similar documents from the same time period, which are kept on file. With the reports of the experts the District Attorney or Attorney General of the state can file a criminal complaint in court. That’s what needs to be done now, immediately. Please, call Arpaio and tell him that he needs to do his job as a duly elected sheriff and file the proper criminal complaint with his District Attorney and Attorney General, not wait another half a year or a year for the Supreme court of Alabama to rule and in the best case scenario get another certified copy of the same forgery as they already filed in Taitz et al v Democratic Party of MS, Obama, Astrue, Onaka (this case is still going on, no decision from the District court yet). Tell Arpaio to file the criminal complaint ASAP!!!
If Mitzi Torri, Attorney for IRS, New Orleans office, made any threats against you or others under any of her pseudonyms, please forward the screenshots and links to email@example.com or to this thread
Posted on | May 15, 2013 | 4 Comments
Submitted on 2013/05/15 at 2:18 pm
Mitzi posts as Black Butterfly, Bilderberg Butterfly and GeorgetownJD at fogbow and obamaconspiracies. She uses Bibikimmers at Gretawire, pretending to be black using every stereotype imaginable. She had an administrative suspension out of Coudersport, Pennsylvania. She is known to create a conservative identity to get close to bloggers with the hope of obtaining personal information. Is this used for more persecution by the IRS?
Better watch your tail Scott; you and “Jack” have crossed legal boundaries that could cost both of you your professions. You have a lot more to lose than just your profession since you weren’t born here. This is what happens when you and your brain trust start with people you have no idea who they are. I’ll be there to wave good bye.
A talked to the special agent. The complaint was divided between offices, I forwarded to her additional information that she needed
Posted on | May 15, 2013 | 2 Comments
I can’t believe it, but I got a call back from the Department of Treasury, from the special agent who left a message for me. I was busy with a patient and could not get to the phone. We’ll see what happens next. I hope they will actually move on the issue of Obama’s stolen SSN used in his tax returns. The agent wanted me to call back and provide more info. I called and left a message. I hope Holder is not bugging my phone.
Posted on | May 15, 2013 | 28 Comments
It looks like judge England did not issue the final order to dismiss the Grinols case and there is no transcript from the clerk either. I am still waiting for the transcript. the 9th circuit states that they do not have jurisdiction as there is not final order to dismiss by judge England
Posted on | May 15, 2013 | 12 Comments
13-15627 James Grinols, et al v. Electoral College, et al “Clerk Order Filed”
10:22 AM (10 minutes ago)
***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing.
The following transaction was entered on 05/15/2013 at 10:22:08 AM PDT and filed on 05/15/2013
|Case Name:||James Grinols, et al v. Electoral College, et al|
Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: SLJ): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over the appeal because an order denying a motion for default judgment is not a final appealable order. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Bird v. Reese, 875 F.2d 256 (9th Cir. 1989) (order). Moreover, a review of the district court docket shows that a final order granting appellees’ motions to dismiss has not yet been filed. Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellants shall move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellants elect to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellants do not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court.  (WL)
Notice will be electronically mailed to:
Mr. Edward Alan Olsen, Assistant U.S. Attorney
Doctor Orly Taitz, Counsel
George Michael Waters
The following document(s) are associated with this transaction:
Document Description: Main Document
Original Filename: 13-15627.pdf
Electronic Document Stamp:
[STAMP acecfStamp_ID=1106763461 [Date=05/15/2013] [FileNumber=8629706-0] [
More evidence that Zuckerberg and Facebook are aiding and abetting Obama regime and aiding and abetting the usurpation of the U.S. Presidency by Obama.
Posted on | May 18, 2013 | No Comments
Posted on | May 18, 2013 | No Comments
Submitted on 2013/05/18 at 5:20 am
I agree 100% Dr. Taitz. We need men of courage to do the right thing for our nation. Not even for us, but for the future of our children and grandchildren.
Posted on | May 18, 2013 | No Comments
Submitted on 2013/05/18 at 5:33 am
I wonder if Zullo is taking advantage of the elderly Sheriff Joe.
Call Arpaio (602) 876-1801 directly. Ask to speak to “Cookie” Sifuentes — she is Sheriff Joe’s personal assistant.
Posted on | May 18, 2013 | No Comments
Submitted on 2013/05/18 at 5:34 am
When I heard Zullo and Gallups call Orly an obot, I couldn’t believe what I was hearing. What is so obot about wanting the sheriff and cold case posse to file a criminal complaint against the usurper? Orly was working on this way longer than they were and is way far from being an obot. What obot would say that bo has fake documents and stolen ID? Obots are always trying to defend the usurper and call people who know the facts wing nuts, birthers, conspiracy theorists, etc. because they cannot refute the facts and have nothing but the usurper’s lies to go by to defend him.
Posted on | May 18, 2013 | No Comments
Posted on | May 17, 2013 | No Comments
The Veterans Disability Act of 2010 is a Federal law which exempts VA disability from withholding of any sort. Actually, existing code USC, Title 38, §5301 already protected VA disability from withholding, but this provision was re-iterated and included in the newer legislation of 2010, because too many civil court judges were legislating from the bench and including veterans’ disability monies as earned income and granting it to ex-spouses (men and women) in divorce proceedings, at times, leaving disabled veterans without any safety net for self-care.However, the IRS is still figuring out ways to get to a veteran’s disability money. How do I know? Recently, it happened to me.
A couple of months ago, when I logged into my online bank account to make sure that my VA disability check had been deposited (I am a 60% disabled veteran of the Iraq War) I saw red and a negative balance, beside which read the word “hold.”
I called my bank and was informed that the IRS had sent a letter demanding that the bank take all of the available funds out of my account on the first day of the month and then wire them to them. The bank gave me a telephone number at which to call the IRS. After being placed on hold for a very long time- long as in a biblical age- I finally spoke with an agent.
Long story short; they claim I made $157,000 in 2010 and that I owe them tons of money, and that until I pay it, a lien will remain on my personal bank account.
At the beginning of 2010, I was still in the hospital recovering from injuries I’d sustained while serving in Iraq. I was released early in the year, but still did not find employment until October, and even then, it was only part time. I can assure you, as I did the IRS, that I did not earn $157,000.00. Actually, I earned less than $10,000.00 in 2010.
I kindly read the federal code mentioned above to the lady I spoke with at the IRS, reminding her that VA disability money is 100% exempt. She placed me on hold for another age (I could see a man coming- bearing water- over the horizon) and then she came back on the line and told me, “We do not take veterans’ disability money. We wait until the funds are deposited from the VA and then we take all of the funds from your bank account.”
Isn’t this called laundering?
I find it ironic, now, that only weeks before the IRS put this hold on my bank account, I’d been asked to be a contributing writer for key Tea Party personality “Joe the Plumber.” I’d been writing freelance articles on veterans affairs for some time, publishing and distributing them mostly through Facebook, and I viewed the personal call Joe made to me as one of the greatest compliments I’d been paid in regard to those articles. I jumped at the opportunity to join his team and give my work, such as this piece, a wider audience. I can’t help but think that part of my decision to join Joe’s team may have played a part in being singled out by the IRS at this specific time and having my VA disability money taken from me in complete breach of federal law.
The good news is that through my persistence, and my refusal to accept their answer, that it is okay to launder VA disability money, I was able to get the IRS to refund all of the money they’d taken from my bank. I am working with the IRS to remedy their great misunderstanding of my earnings for 2010, and I am reaching out to all disabled veterans to let them know that if this is happening to them, they do have rights, and they need to stand up for them.
As many veterans know, our war does not stop once we make it home. Often, new battles begin, such as battles for the rights our government promised they’d provide for us upon our return from war that they often turn around and attempt to take away.
Currently in America, twenty two veterans a day are committing suicide. One of the biggest contributors to the suicide epidemic is our veterans’ inability to find suitable work after serving and the inability to take care of themselves and their families financially. This is why VA disability is sacred- except in the eyes of the IRS. Too many disabled veterans in the U.S. Are just a disability check away from being on the street and joining the already nearly 70,000 homeless veterans in America.
If you are a veteran receiving disability from the VA, and you are having it garnished, withheld, or having a lien placed upon it for any reason, please contact the entity who is withholding, garnishing, or who has placed the lien, and reference the federal code stated earlier in this article. You stood up for the rights of all people of a great nation in combat, but unfortunately, you must continue to stand up for yourselves to ensure that the promises of being taken care of upon your return are kept. But you can do it, because you are a warrior, and that’s what warriors do.
Editor’s Note: Kevin originally posted his article on Yahoo, but wanted to get the word out about this to the audience of FreedomOutpost. Drop him a line on the article located here to let him know what you think. ###
Read more: http://freedomoutpost.com/
Please, contact Petitions 2Congress. After 50,000 people signed my petition for Congress to immediately investigate Obama’s forged IDs and his use of a stolen CT SSN 042-68-4425, the petition disappeared from the web site. Demand to repost it immediately. Tell every Congressman and senator: start investigation or sooner or later we will investigate and prosecute you for treason
Posted on | May 17, 2013 | 17 Comments
Where is the petition?
You can see that the alleged copy of BS filed in MS is different from one filed in AL and both of them are different from the one posted by Obama on whitehouse.gov
Posted on | May 17, 2013 | No Comments
This in itself is an evidence of forgery of a forgery and cover up.
I have affidavits and you can see for yourself that the alleged copy submitted in MS is a falsified document, a forgery of a forgery which was originally posted on line by Obama. The doc in AL is different as well.
The forger took into account all of the points that experts wrote attesting to forgery in Obama’s BC and cleaned it up to make it look more genuine. You can see that they changed the color, there is color saturation with green to make it look lighter, so the halo effect will be less visible. You can see that all the layers were flattened and there were changes to the background. Tell Arpaio to file it with the DA with his criminal complaint. He already has evidence showing that the doc in MS is different from the doc in AL and from the original BC
Concentration camps in America. Watch this chilling video, showing a ready for use concentration camp in Indiana. Contact governors of states, particularly Governor Mike Pence in Indiana, and demand immediate dismantling of these camps. Demand de-funding of these concentration camps in America
Posted on | May 17, 2013 | 9 Comments
11:48 PM (6 hours ago)